Cargando…

In vivo measurement of stent length by using intravascular ultrasound

BACKGROUND: What happens to stent length when deployed in a coronary artery? It is the aim of this study. RESULTS: Consecutive 95 balloon-expandable stents (BES) were studied by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging. The stent length was measured from the longitudinal view in two ways: (1) edge-to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Algowhary, Magdy, Taha, Salma, Hasan-Ali, Hosam, Matsumura, Akihiko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6923296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31858288
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43044-019-0036-9
_version_ 1783481503701794816
author Algowhary, Magdy
Taha, Salma
Hasan-Ali, Hosam
Matsumura, Akihiko
author_facet Algowhary, Magdy
Taha, Salma
Hasan-Ali, Hosam
Matsumura, Akihiko
author_sort Algowhary, Magdy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: What happens to stent length when deployed in a coronary artery? It is the aim of this study. RESULTS: Consecutive 95 balloon-expandable stents (BES) were studied by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging. The stent length was measured from the longitudinal view in two ways: (1) edge-to-edge length (E-E) measured between distal and proximal stent frames located at one IVUS quadrant and (2) area-to-area length (A-A) measured between distal and proximal stent frames located at two or more IVUS quadrants. IVUS measurements were compared with the manufacturer-stated length (M-L). The median E-E length was significantly longer than M-L, 18.76 mm [interquartile range (IQR) 15.65–23.60] versus 18.00 mm (IQR 15.00–23.00), respectively, p < 0.0001. Also, the median A-A length was significantly longer, 18.36 mm (IQR 15.19–23.47), p < 0.0001, than M-L. Moreover, the E-E length was significantly different from A-A length, p < 0.0001. Among the stent groups, the differences were significantly present in all drug-eluting stent and bare metal stent (BMS) comparisons, p < 0.0001, except the A-A length versus M-L in BMS only. By multivariate analysis, the predictors of difference in stent length were as follows: lesion length, p = 0.01; pre-intervention minimal diameter of the external elastic membrane (EEM), p = 0.03; lesions present in the left anterior descending branch, p = 0.03; and M-L, p = 0.04. CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, the length of BES measured by IVUS was significantly different from the manufacturer-stated length. In addition to the manufacturer length, other important factors such as lesion length, pre-intervention diameter of EEM, and affected vessel determine the stent length.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6923296
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69232962020-01-03 In vivo measurement of stent length by using intravascular ultrasound Algowhary, Magdy Taha, Salma Hasan-Ali, Hosam Matsumura, Akihiko Egypt Heart J Research BACKGROUND: What happens to stent length when deployed in a coronary artery? It is the aim of this study. RESULTS: Consecutive 95 balloon-expandable stents (BES) were studied by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging. The stent length was measured from the longitudinal view in two ways: (1) edge-to-edge length (E-E) measured between distal and proximal stent frames located at one IVUS quadrant and (2) area-to-area length (A-A) measured between distal and proximal stent frames located at two or more IVUS quadrants. IVUS measurements were compared with the manufacturer-stated length (M-L). The median E-E length was significantly longer than M-L, 18.76 mm [interquartile range (IQR) 15.65–23.60] versus 18.00 mm (IQR 15.00–23.00), respectively, p < 0.0001. Also, the median A-A length was significantly longer, 18.36 mm (IQR 15.19–23.47), p < 0.0001, than M-L. Moreover, the E-E length was significantly different from A-A length, p < 0.0001. Among the stent groups, the differences were significantly present in all drug-eluting stent and bare metal stent (BMS) comparisons, p < 0.0001, except the A-A length versus M-L in BMS only. By multivariate analysis, the predictors of difference in stent length were as follows: lesion length, p = 0.01; pre-intervention minimal diameter of the external elastic membrane (EEM), p = 0.03; lesions present in the left anterior descending branch, p = 0.03; and M-L, p = 0.04. CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, the length of BES measured by IVUS was significantly different from the manufacturer-stated length. In addition to the manufacturer length, other important factors such as lesion length, pre-intervention diameter of EEM, and affected vessel determine the stent length. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6923296/ /pubmed/31858288 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43044-019-0036-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Algowhary, Magdy
Taha, Salma
Hasan-Ali, Hosam
Matsumura, Akihiko
In vivo measurement of stent length by using intravascular ultrasound
title In vivo measurement of stent length by using intravascular ultrasound
title_full In vivo measurement of stent length by using intravascular ultrasound
title_fullStr In vivo measurement of stent length by using intravascular ultrasound
title_full_unstemmed In vivo measurement of stent length by using intravascular ultrasound
title_short In vivo measurement of stent length by using intravascular ultrasound
title_sort in vivo measurement of stent length by using intravascular ultrasound
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6923296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31858288
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43044-019-0036-9
work_keys_str_mv AT algowharymagdy invivomeasurementofstentlengthbyusingintravascularultrasound
AT tahasalma invivomeasurementofstentlengthbyusingintravascularultrasound
AT hasanalihosam invivomeasurementofstentlengthbyusingintravascularultrasound
AT matsumuraakihiko invivomeasurementofstentlengthbyusingintravascularultrasound