Cargando…
In vivo measurement of stent length by using intravascular ultrasound
BACKGROUND: What happens to stent length when deployed in a coronary artery? It is the aim of this study. RESULTS: Consecutive 95 balloon-expandable stents (BES) were studied by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging. The stent length was measured from the longitudinal view in two ways: (1) edge-to...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6923296/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31858288 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43044-019-0036-9 |
_version_ | 1783481503701794816 |
---|---|
author | Algowhary, Magdy Taha, Salma Hasan-Ali, Hosam Matsumura, Akihiko |
author_facet | Algowhary, Magdy Taha, Salma Hasan-Ali, Hosam Matsumura, Akihiko |
author_sort | Algowhary, Magdy |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: What happens to stent length when deployed in a coronary artery? It is the aim of this study. RESULTS: Consecutive 95 balloon-expandable stents (BES) were studied by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging. The stent length was measured from the longitudinal view in two ways: (1) edge-to-edge length (E-E) measured between distal and proximal stent frames located at one IVUS quadrant and (2) area-to-area length (A-A) measured between distal and proximal stent frames located at two or more IVUS quadrants. IVUS measurements were compared with the manufacturer-stated length (M-L). The median E-E length was significantly longer than M-L, 18.76 mm [interquartile range (IQR) 15.65–23.60] versus 18.00 mm (IQR 15.00–23.00), respectively, p < 0.0001. Also, the median A-A length was significantly longer, 18.36 mm (IQR 15.19–23.47), p < 0.0001, than M-L. Moreover, the E-E length was significantly different from A-A length, p < 0.0001. Among the stent groups, the differences were significantly present in all drug-eluting stent and bare metal stent (BMS) comparisons, p < 0.0001, except the A-A length versus M-L in BMS only. By multivariate analysis, the predictors of difference in stent length were as follows: lesion length, p = 0.01; pre-intervention minimal diameter of the external elastic membrane (EEM), p = 0.03; lesions present in the left anterior descending branch, p = 0.03; and M-L, p = 0.04. CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, the length of BES measured by IVUS was significantly different from the manufacturer-stated length. In addition to the manufacturer length, other important factors such as lesion length, pre-intervention diameter of EEM, and affected vessel determine the stent length. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6923296 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69232962020-01-03 In vivo measurement of stent length by using intravascular ultrasound Algowhary, Magdy Taha, Salma Hasan-Ali, Hosam Matsumura, Akihiko Egypt Heart J Research BACKGROUND: What happens to stent length when deployed in a coronary artery? It is the aim of this study. RESULTS: Consecutive 95 balloon-expandable stents (BES) were studied by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging. The stent length was measured from the longitudinal view in two ways: (1) edge-to-edge length (E-E) measured between distal and proximal stent frames located at one IVUS quadrant and (2) area-to-area length (A-A) measured between distal and proximal stent frames located at two or more IVUS quadrants. IVUS measurements were compared with the manufacturer-stated length (M-L). The median E-E length was significantly longer than M-L, 18.76 mm [interquartile range (IQR) 15.65–23.60] versus 18.00 mm (IQR 15.00–23.00), respectively, p < 0.0001. Also, the median A-A length was significantly longer, 18.36 mm (IQR 15.19–23.47), p < 0.0001, than M-L. Moreover, the E-E length was significantly different from A-A length, p < 0.0001. Among the stent groups, the differences were significantly present in all drug-eluting stent and bare metal stent (BMS) comparisons, p < 0.0001, except the A-A length versus M-L in BMS only. By multivariate analysis, the predictors of difference in stent length were as follows: lesion length, p = 0.01; pre-intervention minimal diameter of the external elastic membrane (EEM), p = 0.03; lesions present in the left anterior descending branch, p = 0.03; and M-L, p = 0.04. CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, the length of BES measured by IVUS was significantly different from the manufacturer-stated length. In addition to the manufacturer length, other important factors such as lesion length, pre-intervention diameter of EEM, and affected vessel determine the stent length. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6923296/ /pubmed/31858288 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43044-019-0036-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Algowhary, Magdy Taha, Salma Hasan-Ali, Hosam Matsumura, Akihiko In vivo measurement of stent length by using intravascular ultrasound |
title | In vivo measurement of stent length by using intravascular ultrasound |
title_full | In vivo measurement of stent length by using intravascular ultrasound |
title_fullStr | In vivo measurement of stent length by using intravascular ultrasound |
title_full_unstemmed | In vivo measurement of stent length by using intravascular ultrasound |
title_short | In vivo measurement of stent length by using intravascular ultrasound |
title_sort | in vivo measurement of stent length by using intravascular ultrasound |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6923296/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31858288 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43044-019-0036-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT algowharymagdy invivomeasurementofstentlengthbyusingintravascularultrasound AT tahasalma invivomeasurementofstentlengthbyusingintravascularultrasound AT hasanalihosam invivomeasurementofstentlengthbyusingintravascularultrasound AT matsumuraakihiko invivomeasurementofstentlengthbyusingintravascularultrasound |