Cargando…

Eribulin mesylate use as third-line therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer (VESPRY): a prospective, multicentre, observational study

BACKGROUND: In real-world practice, eribulin mesylate provides significant survival benefit, with a manageable safety profile in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). METHODS: In this prospective, open-label, multicentre, observational study we evaluated the effectiveness...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Adamo, Vincenzo, Ricciardi, Giuseppina Rosaria Rita, Giuffrida, Dario, Scandurra, Giuseppa, Russo, Antonio, Blasi, Livio, Spadaro, Pietro, Iacono, Carmelo, Soto Parra, Hector J., Savarino, Antonino, Ferraú, Francesco, Zerilli, Filippo, Verderame, Francesco, Butera, Alfredo, Santangelo, Carlo, Franchina, Veronica, Caruso, Michele
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6923689/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31903098
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1758835919895755
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: In real-world practice, eribulin mesylate provides significant survival benefit, with a manageable safety profile in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). METHODS: In this prospective, open-label, multicentre, observational study we evaluated the effectiveness and tolerability of eribulin as third-line treatment in a homogeneous population. The primary endpoints were the safety profile and response in metastatic sites; secondary endpoints included the response in different subtypes, overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: From 2013 to 2016, 118 women were treated in 21 Sicilian institutions; the median age was 58 years (range 29–79), with 69% of patients under 65. The median cycles of eribulin were 5.5 (range 1–26). The most common adverse event was neutropenia (9.3%, 3 cases of grade 3, 4 of grade 4); only 1 case of QT prolongation was reported. Eribulin was effective in controlling metastatic disease in all sites, and it achieved the highest ORR in brain (16%) and liver (14.9%). Median OS was 31.8 months (95% CI 27.9–34.4) and median PFS 5.5 months (95% CI 4.2–6.6). PFS was 5.2 months (95% CI 2.8–8.4) in patients with triple-negative subtype. Median PFS was longer in patients over 65 years (6.1 months, 95% CI 4.4–8.3). In patients who had visceral metastases PFS was 5.5 months (95% CI 95% 3.5–6.6) and OS 33.9 months (95% CI 29.8–40.8). CONCLUSIONS: Eribulin as third-line treatment shows an acceptable safety profile and a substantial antitumour activity in the treatment of MBC, even in elderly patients and in those with visceral disease.