Cargando…

Comparison of four different internal fixation methods in the treatment of distal clavicle fractures

This study compared the clinical efficacy of four internal fixation methods in the treatment of distal clavicle fractures, in an effort to guide appropriate selection and application in the clinic. Eighty-four patients with distal clavicle-comminuted fractures were treated with a distal clavicle ana...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Liang, Wu, Hongxiao, Jiang, Peichao, Han, Xiaochuan, Chen, Shiyuan, Yu, Xuezhong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: D.A. Spandidos 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6923748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31897095
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2019.8233
_version_ 1783481585959436288
author Li, Liang
Wu, Hongxiao
Jiang, Peichao
Han, Xiaochuan
Chen, Shiyuan
Yu, Xuezhong
author_facet Li, Liang
Wu, Hongxiao
Jiang, Peichao
Han, Xiaochuan
Chen, Shiyuan
Yu, Xuezhong
author_sort Li, Liang
collection PubMed
description This study compared the clinical efficacy of four internal fixation methods in the treatment of distal clavicle fractures, in an effort to guide appropriate selection and application in the clinic. Eighty-four patients with distal clavicle-comminuted fractures were treated with a distal clavicle anatomic plate (group A), clavicular hook plate (group B), double-plate vertical fixation (group C), or T-shaped steel plate internal fixation (group D). The Constant-Murley scoring system was used to evaluate the shoulder joint function. The fracture healing time, VAS, and postoperative complications were compared and analyzed among the four groups. According to the Constant-Murley evaluation standard, the excellent and good rates of the four groups were 94.4, 73.1, 95 and 80% in groups A-D, respectively. The excellent and good rates of Constant-Murley evaluation standard in groups A and C were significantly better than those in groups B and D (P<0.05). VAS in the distal clavicle anatomic plate group (group A), double-plate vertical fixation group (group C), and T-shaped steel plate internal fixation group (group D) were significantly better than the clavicular hook plate group (group B) (P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in the clavicular hook plate group (group B) was 15.4% and in the T-shaped steel plate internal fixation group (group D) was 15%, which were significantly higher than those of the distal clavicle anatomic plate group (group A) and double-plate vertical internal fixation group (group C) (P<0.05). The treatment of distal clavicle fractures using either one of the four internal fixation techniques can obtain better clinical results. The distal clavicle anatomic plate and double-plate vertical internal fixation techniques are associated with a decreased incidence of shoulder pain, an increase in the range of motion of the shoulder, and a reduction in complications, and thus, are preferable for the early functional recovery of limbs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6923748
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher D.A. Spandidos
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69237482020-01-02 Comparison of four different internal fixation methods in the treatment of distal clavicle fractures Li, Liang Wu, Hongxiao Jiang, Peichao Han, Xiaochuan Chen, Shiyuan Yu, Xuezhong Exp Ther Med Articles This study compared the clinical efficacy of four internal fixation methods in the treatment of distal clavicle fractures, in an effort to guide appropriate selection and application in the clinic. Eighty-four patients with distal clavicle-comminuted fractures were treated with a distal clavicle anatomic plate (group A), clavicular hook plate (group B), double-plate vertical fixation (group C), or T-shaped steel plate internal fixation (group D). The Constant-Murley scoring system was used to evaluate the shoulder joint function. The fracture healing time, VAS, and postoperative complications were compared and analyzed among the four groups. According to the Constant-Murley evaluation standard, the excellent and good rates of the four groups were 94.4, 73.1, 95 and 80% in groups A-D, respectively. The excellent and good rates of Constant-Murley evaluation standard in groups A and C were significantly better than those in groups B and D (P<0.05). VAS in the distal clavicle anatomic plate group (group A), double-plate vertical fixation group (group C), and T-shaped steel plate internal fixation group (group D) were significantly better than the clavicular hook plate group (group B) (P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in the clavicular hook plate group (group B) was 15.4% and in the T-shaped steel plate internal fixation group (group D) was 15%, which were significantly higher than those of the distal clavicle anatomic plate group (group A) and double-plate vertical internal fixation group (group C) (P<0.05). The treatment of distal clavicle fractures using either one of the four internal fixation techniques can obtain better clinical results. The distal clavicle anatomic plate and double-plate vertical internal fixation techniques are associated with a decreased incidence of shoulder pain, an increase in the range of motion of the shoulder, and a reduction in complications, and thus, are preferable for the early functional recovery of limbs. D.A. Spandidos 2020-01 2019-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6923748/ /pubmed/31897095 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2019.8233 Text en Copyright: © Li et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Articles
Li, Liang
Wu, Hongxiao
Jiang, Peichao
Han, Xiaochuan
Chen, Shiyuan
Yu, Xuezhong
Comparison of four different internal fixation methods in the treatment of distal clavicle fractures
title Comparison of four different internal fixation methods in the treatment of distal clavicle fractures
title_full Comparison of four different internal fixation methods in the treatment of distal clavicle fractures
title_fullStr Comparison of four different internal fixation methods in the treatment of distal clavicle fractures
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of four different internal fixation methods in the treatment of distal clavicle fractures
title_short Comparison of four different internal fixation methods in the treatment of distal clavicle fractures
title_sort comparison of four different internal fixation methods in the treatment of distal clavicle fractures
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6923748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31897095
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2019.8233
work_keys_str_mv AT liliang comparisonoffourdifferentinternalfixationmethodsinthetreatmentofdistalclaviclefractures
AT wuhongxiao comparisonoffourdifferentinternalfixationmethodsinthetreatmentofdistalclaviclefractures
AT jiangpeichao comparisonoffourdifferentinternalfixationmethodsinthetreatmentofdistalclaviclefractures
AT hanxiaochuan comparisonoffourdifferentinternalfixationmethodsinthetreatmentofdistalclaviclefractures
AT chenshiyuan comparisonoffourdifferentinternalfixationmethodsinthetreatmentofdistalclaviclefractures
AT yuxuezhong comparisonoffourdifferentinternalfixationmethodsinthetreatmentofdistalclaviclefractures