Cargando…
Using stakeholder input to inform scenario content: an example from physiotherapy
BACKGROUND: Simulated learning environments (SLEs) are being embraced as effective, though potentially costly tools, by health educators in a variety of contexts. The selection of scenarios, however, can be arbitrary and idiosyncratic. METHODS: We conducted a stakeholder audit to determine prioritie...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6923834/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31890316 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41077-019-0102-0 |
_version_ | 1783481602021523456 |
---|---|
author | Edwards, Sandy Tuttle, Neil |
author_facet | Edwards, Sandy Tuttle, Neil |
author_sort | Edwards, Sandy |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Simulated learning environments (SLEs) are being embraced as effective, though potentially costly tools, by health educators in a variety of contexts. The selection of scenarios, however, can be arbitrary and idiosyncratic. METHODS: We conducted a stakeholder audit to determine priorities for student learning which would inform scenario design. The process consisted of (1) the identification of stakeholders, (2) consultation with stakeholders to identify their priorities, (3) determination of priorities that could be addressed in the SLE being developed, and (4) incorporating these priorities into scenarios. RESULTS: The identified stakeholders were the funding body, educational institution and discipline, regulatory agency, accreditation agency, external clinical placement providers, employers of new graduates, patients, and learners. Stakeholder input included a combination of surveys, consultation of online resources, and semi-structured interviews. Identified areas where student learning could be improved included (1) all students not having experience of all populations or ‘essential’ conditions, (2) situations where adverse events had occurred, (3) working with people from diverse backgrounds or those with psychosocial issues including those in chronic pain, (4) communication, (5) situation awareness, and (6) ethical issues. CONCLUSIONS: Ten scenarios were developed considering the stakeholder input. Facilitator notes were written to ensure all facilitators addressed the areas that had been identified. Where possible, simulated patients, with diverse backgrounds, were hired to portray roles even though such areas of diversity were not explicitly written into the scenarios. Whilst the example concerns physiotherapy students within Australia, the principles may be applicable across a range of health disciplines. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s41077-019-0102-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6923834 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69238342019-12-30 Using stakeholder input to inform scenario content: an example from physiotherapy Edwards, Sandy Tuttle, Neil Adv Simul (Lond) Methodology BACKGROUND: Simulated learning environments (SLEs) are being embraced as effective, though potentially costly tools, by health educators in a variety of contexts. The selection of scenarios, however, can be arbitrary and idiosyncratic. METHODS: We conducted a stakeholder audit to determine priorities for student learning which would inform scenario design. The process consisted of (1) the identification of stakeholders, (2) consultation with stakeholders to identify their priorities, (3) determination of priorities that could be addressed in the SLE being developed, and (4) incorporating these priorities into scenarios. RESULTS: The identified stakeholders were the funding body, educational institution and discipline, regulatory agency, accreditation agency, external clinical placement providers, employers of new graduates, patients, and learners. Stakeholder input included a combination of surveys, consultation of online resources, and semi-structured interviews. Identified areas where student learning could be improved included (1) all students not having experience of all populations or ‘essential’ conditions, (2) situations where adverse events had occurred, (3) working with people from diverse backgrounds or those with psychosocial issues including those in chronic pain, (4) communication, (5) situation awareness, and (6) ethical issues. CONCLUSIONS: Ten scenarios were developed considering the stakeholder input. Facilitator notes were written to ensure all facilitators addressed the areas that had been identified. Where possible, simulated patients, with diverse backgrounds, were hired to portray roles even though such areas of diversity were not explicitly written into the scenarios. Whilst the example concerns physiotherapy students within Australia, the principles may be applicable across a range of health disciplines. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s41077-019-0102-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6923834/ /pubmed/31890316 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41077-019-0102-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Edwards, Sandy Tuttle, Neil Using stakeholder input to inform scenario content: an example from physiotherapy |
title | Using stakeholder input to inform scenario content: an example from physiotherapy |
title_full | Using stakeholder input to inform scenario content: an example from physiotherapy |
title_fullStr | Using stakeholder input to inform scenario content: an example from physiotherapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Using stakeholder input to inform scenario content: an example from physiotherapy |
title_short | Using stakeholder input to inform scenario content: an example from physiotherapy |
title_sort | using stakeholder input to inform scenario content: an example from physiotherapy |
topic | Methodology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6923834/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31890316 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41077-019-0102-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT edwardssandy usingstakeholderinputtoinformscenariocontentanexamplefromphysiotherapy AT tuttleneil usingstakeholderinputtoinformscenariocontentanexamplefromphysiotherapy |