Cargando…
Variable- versus constant-frequency deep-brain stimulation in patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Deep-brain stimulation targeting the subthalamic nucleus (STN) can be used to treat motor symptoms and dyskinesia in the advanced stages of Parkinson’s disease (PD). High-frequency stimulation (HFS) of the STN can lead to consistent, long-term improvement of PD symptoms. However, the eff...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6924017/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31856908 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3884-4 |
_version_ | 1783481644679692288 |
---|---|
author | Jia, Fumin Zhang, Jianguo Wang, Huimin Liang, Zhanhua Liu, Weiguo Wang, Xuelian Liu, Yiming Guo, Yi Ling, Zhipei Cai, Xiaodong Wu, Xi Wu, Jianjun Lv, Wen Xu, Xin Zhang, Wenbin Li, Luming |
author_facet | Jia, Fumin Zhang, Jianguo Wang, Huimin Liang, Zhanhua Liu, Weiguo Wang, Xuelian Liu, Yiming Guo, Yi Ling, Zhipei Cai, Xiaodong Wu, Xi Wu, Jianjun Lv, Wen Xu, Xin Zhang, Wenbin Li, Luming |
author_sort | Jia, Fumin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Deep-brain stimulation targeting the subthalamic nucleus (STN) can be used to treat motor symptoms and dyskinesia in the advanced stages of Parkinson’s disease (PD). High-frequency stimulation (HFS) of the STN can lead to consistent, long-term improvement of PD symptoms. However, the effects of HFS on the axial symptoms of PD, specifically freezing of gait, can be limited or cause further impairment. While this can be alleviated via relatively low-frequency stimulation (LFS) in selected patients, LFS does not control all motor symptoms of PD. Recently, the National Engineering Laboratory for Neuromodulation reported preliminary findings regarding an efficient way to combine the advantages of HFS and LFS to form variable-frequency stimulation (VFS). However, this novel therapeutic strategy has not been formally tested in a randomized trial. METHODS/DESIGN: We propose a multicenter, double-blind clinical trial involving 11 study hospitals and an established deep-brain stimulation team. The participants will be divided into a VFS and a constant-frequency stimulation group. The primary outcome will be changes in stand–walk–sit task scores after 3 months of treatment in the “medication off” condition. Secondary outcome measures include specific item scores on the Freezing of Gait Questionnaire and quality of life. The aim of this trial is to investigate the efficacy and safety of VFS compared with constant-frequency stimulation. DISCUSSION: This is the first randomized controlled trial to comprehensively evaluate the effectiveness and safety of VFS of the STN in patients with advanced PD. VFS may represent a new option for clinical treatment of PD in the future. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03053726. Registered on February 15, 2017. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6924017 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69240172019-12-30 Variable- versus constant-frequency deep-brain stimulation in patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Jia, Fumin Zhang, Jianguo Wang, Huimin Liang, Zhanhua Liu, Weiguo Wang, Xuelian Liu, Yiming Guo, Yi Ling, Zhipei Cai, Xiaodong Wu, Xi Wu, Jianjun Lv, Wen Xu, Xin Zhang, Wenbin Li, Luming Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Deep-brain stimulation targeting the subthalamic nucleus (STN) can be used to treat motor symptoms and dyskinesia in the advanced stages of Parkinson’s disease (PD). High-frequency stimulation (HFS) of the STN can lead to consistent, long-term improvement of PD symptoms. However, the effects of HFS on the axial symptoms of PD, specifically freezing of gait, can be limited or cause further impairment. While this can be alleviated via relatively low-frequency stimulation (LFS) in selected patients, LFS does not control all motor symptoms of PD. Recently, the National Engineering Laboratory for Neuromodulation reported preliminary findings regarding an efficient way to combine the advantages of HFS and LFS to form variable-frequency stimulation (VFS). However, this novel therapeutic strategy has not been formally tested in a randomized trial. METHODS/DESIGN: We propose a multicenter, double-blind clinical trial involving 11 study hospitals and an established deep-brain stimulation team. The participants will be divided into a VFS and a constant-frequency stimulation group. The primary outcome will be changes in stand–walk–sit task scores after 3 months of treatment in the “medication off” condition. Secondary outcome measures include specific item scores on the Freezing of Gait Questionnaire and quality of life. The aim of this trial is to investigate the efficacy and safety of VFS compared with constant-frequency stimulation. DISCUSSION: This is the first randomized controlled trial to comprehensively evaluate the effectiveness and safety of VFS of the STN in patients with advanced PD. VFS may represent a new option for clinical treatment of PD in the future. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03053726. Registered on February 15, 2017. BioMed Central 2019-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6924017/ /pubmed/31856908 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3884-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Jia, Fumin Zhang, Jianguo Wang, Huimin Liang, Zhanhua Liu, Weiguo Wang, Xuelian Liu, Yiming Guo, Yi Ling, Zhipei Cai, Xiaodong Wu, Xi Wu, Jianjun Lv, Wen Xu, Xin Zhang, Wenbin Li, Luming Variable- versus constant-frequency deep-brain stimulation in patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title | Variable- versus constant-frequency deep-brain stimulation in patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Variable- versus constant-frequency deep-brain stimulation in patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Variable- versus constant-frequency deep-brain stimulation in patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Variable- versus constant-frequency deep-brain stimulation in patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Variable- versus constant-frequency deep-brain stimulation in patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | variable- versus constant-frequency deep-brain stimulation in patients with advanced parkinson’s disease: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6924017/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31856908 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3884-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jiafumin variableversusconstantfrequencydeepbrainstimulationinpatientswithadvancedparkinsonsdiseasestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT zhangjianguo variableversusconstantfrequencydeepbrainstimulationinpatientswithadvancedparkinsonsdiseasestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wanghuimin variableversusconstantfrequencydeepbrainstimulationinpatientswithadvancedparkinsonsdiseasestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT liangzhanhua variableversusconstantfrequencydeepbrainstimulationinpatientswithadvancedparkinsonsdiseasestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT liuweiguo variableversusconstantfrequencydeepbrainstimulationinpatientswithadvancedparkinsonsdiseasestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wangxuelian variableversusconstantfrequencydeepbrainstimulationinpatientswithadvancedparkinsonsdiseasestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT liuyiming variableversusconstantfrequencydeepbrainstimulationinpatientswithadvancedparkinsonsdiseasestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT guoyi variableversusconstantfrequencydeepbrainstimulationinpatientswithadvancedparkinsonsdiseasestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT lingzhipei variableversusconstantfrequencydeepbrainstimulationinpatientswithadvancedparkinsonsdiseasestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT caixiaodong variableversusconstantfrequencydeepbrainstimulationinpatientswithadvancedparkinsonsdiseasestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wuxi variableversusconstantfrequencydeepbrainstimulationinpatientswithadvancedparkinsonsdiseasestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wujianjun variableversusconstantfrequencydeepbrainstimulationinpatientswithadvancedparkinsonsdiseasestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT lvwen variableversusconstantfrequencydeepbrainstimulationinpatientswithadvancedparkinsonsdiseasestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT xuxin variableversusconstantfrequencydeepbrainstimulationinpatientswithadvancedparkinsonsdiseasestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT zhangwenbin variableversusconstantfrequencydeepbrainstimulationinpatientswithadvancedparkinsonsdiseasestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT liluming variableversusconstantfrequencydeepbrainstimulationinpatientswithadvancedparkinsonsdiseasestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial |