Cargando…

Comparative Effectiveness of Local Application of Chlorhexidine Gluconate, Mupirocin Ointment, and Normal Saline for the Prevention of Peritoneal Dialysis-related Infections (COSMO-PD Trial): a multicenter randomized, double-blind, controlled protocol

BACKGROUND: Current international guidelines recommend the use of a daily topical exit-site antimicrobial to prevent peritoneal dialysis (PD)-related infections. Although nonantibiotic-based therapies are appealing because they may limit antimicrobial resistance, no controlled trials have been condu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nochaiwong, Surapon, Ruengorn, Chidchanok, Noppakun, Kajohnsak, Panyathong, Setthapon, Dandecha, Phongsak, Sood, Manish M., Saenjum, Chalermpong, Awiphan, Ratanaporn, Sirilun, Sasithorn, Mongkhon, Pajaree, Chongruksut, Wilaiwan, Thavorn, Kednapa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6924023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31856900
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3953-8
_version_ 1783481646105755648
author Nochaiwong, Surapon
Ruengorn, Chidchanok
Noppakun, Kajohnsak
Panyathong, Setthapon
Dandecha, Phongsak
Sood, Manish M.
Saenjum, Chalermpong
Awiphan, Ratanaporn
Sirilun, Sasithorn
Mongkhon, Pajaree
Chongruksut, Wilaiwan
Thavorn, Kednapa
author_facet Nochaiwong, Surapon
Ruengorn, Chidchanok
Noppakun, Kajohnsak
Panyathong, Setthapon
Dandecha, Phongsak
Sood, Manish M.
Saenjum, Chalermpong
Awiphan, Ratanaporn
Sirilun, Sasithorn
Mongkhon, Pajaree
Chongruksut, Wilaiwan
Thavorn, Kednapa
author_sort Nochaiwong, Surapon
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Current international guidelines recommend the use of a daily topical exit-site antimicrobial to prevent peritoneal dialysis (PD)-related infections. Although nonantibiotic-based therapies are appealing because they may limit antimicrobial resistance, no controlled trials have been conducted to compare topical antimicrobial agents with usual exit-site care for the prevention of PD-related infections among the Thai PD population. We propose a controlled three-arm trial to examine the efficacy and safety of a daily chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated patch versus mupirocin ointment versus usual exit-site care with normal saline for the prevention of PD-related infections. METHODS/DESIGNS: This study is a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, active-controlled, clinical trial. Adult patients aged 18 years or older who have end-stage kidney disease and are undergoing PD will be enrolled at three PD Centers in Thailand. A total of 354 PD patients will be randomly assigned to either the 2% chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated patch, mupirocin ointment, or usual exit-site care with normal saline dressing according to a computer-generated random allocation sequence. Participants will be followed until discontinuation of PD or completion of 24 months. The primary study outcomes are time to first PD-related infection (exit-site/tunnel infection or peritonitis) event and the overall difference in PD-related infection rates between study arms. Secondary study outcomes will include (i) the rate of infection-related catheter removal and PD technique failure, (ii) rate of nasal and exit-site Staphylococcus aureus colonization, (iii) healthcare costs, and (iv) skin reactions and adverse events. We plan to conduct a cost-utility analysis alongside the trial from the perspectives of patients and society. A Markov simulation model will be used to estimate the total cost and health outcome in terms of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) over a 20-year time horizon. An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio in Thai Baht and U.S. dollars per QALYs gained will be illustrated. A series of probabilistic sensitivity analyses will be conducted to assess the robustness of the cost-utility analysis findings. DISCUSSION: The results from this study will provide new clinical and cost-effectiveness evidence to support the best strategy for the prevention of PD-related infections among the Thai PD population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02547103. Registered on September 11, 2015.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6924023
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69240232019-12-30 Comparative Effectiveness of Local Application of Chlorhexidine Gluconate, Mupirocin Ointment, and Normal Saline for the Prevention of Peritoneal Dialysis-related Infections (COSMO-PD Trial): a multicenter randomized, double-blind, controlled protocol Nochaiwong, Surapon Ruengorn, Chidchanok Noppakun, Kajohnsak Panyathong, Setthapon Dandecha, Phongsak Sood, Manish M. Saenjum, Chalermpong Awiphan, Ratanaporn Sirilun, Sasithorn Mongkhon, Pajaree Chongruksut, Wilaiwan Thavorn, Kednapa Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Current international guidelines recommend the use of a daily topical exit-site antimicrobial to prevent peritoneal dialysis (PD)-related infections. Although nonantibiotic-based therapies are appealing because they may limit antimicrobial resistance, no controlled trials have been conducted to compare topical antimicrobial agents with usual exit-site care for the prevention of PD-related infections among the Thai PD population. We propose a controlled three-arm trial to examine the efficacy and safety of a daily chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated patch versus mupirocin ointment versus usual exit-site care with normal saline for the prevention of PD-related infections. METHODS/DESIGNS: This study is a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, active-controlled, clinical trial. Adult patients aged 18 years or older who have end-stage kidney disease and are undergoing PD will be enrolled at three PD Centers in Thailand. A total of 354 PD patients will be randomly assigned to either the 2% chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated patch, mupirocin ointment, or usual exit-site care with normal saline dressing according to a computer-generated random allocation sequence. Participants will be followed until discontinuation of PD or completion of 24 months. The primary study outcomes are time to first PD-related infection (exit-site/tunnel infection or peritonitis) event and the overall difference in PD-related infection rates between study arms. Secondary study outcomes will include (i) the rate of infection-related catheter removal and PD technique failure, (ii) rate of nasal and exit-site Staphylococcus aureus colonization, (iii) healthcare costs, and (iv) skin reactions and adverse events. We plan to conduct a cost-utility analysis alongside the trial from the perspectives of patients and society. A Markov simulation model will be used to estimate the total cost and health outcome in terms of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) over a 20-year time horizon. An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio in Thai Baht and U.S. dollars per QALYs gained will be illustrated. A series of probabilistic sensitivity analyses will be conducted to assess the robustness of the cost-utility analysis findings. DISCUSSION: The results from this study will provide new clinical and cost-effectiveness evidence to support the best strategy for the prevention of PD-related infections among the Thai PD population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02547103. Registered on September 11, 2015. BioMed Central 2019-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6924023/ /pubmed/31856900 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3953-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Nochaiwong, Surapon
Ruengorn, Chidchanok
Noppakun, Kajohnsak
Panyathong, Setthapon
Dandecha, Phongsak
Sood, Manish M.
Saenjum, Chalermpong
Awiphan, Ratanaporn
Sirilun, Sasithorn
Mongkhon, Pajaree
Chongruksut, Wilaiwan
Thavorn, Kednapa
Comparative Effectiveness of Local Application of Chlorhexidine Gluconate, Mupirocin Ointment, and Normal Saline for the Prevention of Peritoneal Dialysis-related Infections (COSMO-PD Trial): a multicenter randomized, double-blind, controlled protocol
title Comparative Effectiveness of Local Application of Chlorhexidine Gluconate, Mupirocin Ointment, and Normal Saline for the Prevention of Peritoneal Dialysis-related Infections (COSMO-PD Trial): a multicenter randomized, double-blind, controlled protocol
title_full Comparative Effectiveness of Local Application of Chlorhexidine Gluconate, Mupirocin Ointment, and Normal Saline for the Prevention of Peritoneal Dialysis-related Infections (COSMO-PD Trial): a multicenter randomized, double-blind, controlled protocol
title_fullStr Comparative Effectiveness of Local Application of Chlorhexidine Gluconate, Mupirocin Ointment, and Normal Saline for the Prevention of Peritoneal Dialysis-related Infections (COSMO-PD Trial): a multicenter randomized, double-blind, controlled protocol
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Effectiveness of Local Application of Chlorhexidine Gluconate, Mupirocin Ointment, and Normal Saline for the Prevention of Peritoneal Dialysis-related Infections (COSMO-PD Trial): a multicenter randomized, double-blind, controlled protocol
title_short Comparative Effectiveness of Local Application of Chlorhexidine Gluconate, Mupirocin Ointment, and Normal Saline for the Prevention of Peritoneal Dialysis-related Infections (COSMO-PD Trial): a multicenter randomized, double-blind, controlled protocol
title_sort comparative effectiveness of local application of chlorhexidine gluconate, mupirocin ointment, and normal saline for the prevention of peritoneal dialysis-related infections (cosmo-pd trial): a multicenter randomized, double-blind, controlled protocol
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6924023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31856900
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3953-8
work_keys_str_mv AT nochaiwongsurapon comparativeeffectivenessoflocalapplicationofchlorhexidinegluconatemupirocinointmentandnormalsalineforthepreventionofperitonealdialysisrelatedinfectionscosmopdtrialamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledprotocol
AT ruengornchidchanok comparativeeffectivenessoflocalapplicationofchlorhexidinegluconatemupirocinointmentandnormalsalineforthepreventionofperitonealdialysisrelatedinfectionscosmopdtrialamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledprotocol
AT noppakunkajohnsak comparativeeffectivenessoflocalapplicationofchlorhexidinegluconatemupirocinointmentandnormalsalineforthepreventionofperitonealdialysisrelatedinfectionscosmopdtrialamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledprotocol
AT panyathongsetthapon comparativeeffectivenessoflocalapplicationofchlorhexidinegluconatemupirocinointmentandnormalsalineforthepreventionofperitonealdialysisrelatedinfectionscosmopdtrialamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledprotocol
AT dandechaphongsak comparativeeffectivenessoflocalapplicationofchlorhexidinegluconatemupirocinointmentandnormalsalineforthepreventionofperitonealdialysisrelatedinfectionscosmopdtrialamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledprotocol
AT soodmanishm comparativeeffectivenessoflocalapplicationofchlorhexidinegluconatemupirocinointmentandnormalsalineforthepreventionofperitonealdialysisrelatedinfectionscosmopdtrialamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledprotocol
AT saenjumchalermpong comparativeeffectivenessoflocalapplicationofchlorhexidinegluconatemupirocinointmentandnormalsalineforthepreventionofperitonealdialysisrelatedinfectionscosmopdtrialamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledprotocol
AT awiphanratanaporn comparativeeffectivenessoflocalapplicationofchlorhexidinegluconatemupirocinointmentandnormalsalineforthepreventionofperitonealdialysisrelatedinfectionscosmopdtrialamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledprotocol
AT sirilunsasithorn comparativeeffectivenessoflocalapplicationofchlorhexidinegluconatemupirocinointmentandnormalsalineforthepreventionofperitonealdialysisrelatedinfectionscosmopdtrialamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledprotocol
AT mongkhonpajaree comparativeeffectivenessoflocalapplicationofchlorhexidinegluconatemupirocinointmentandnormalsalineforthepreventionofperitonealdialysisrelatedinfectionscosmopdtrialamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledprotocol
AT chongruksutwilaiwan comparativeeffectivenessoflocalapplicationofchlorhexidinegluconatemupirocinointmentandnormalsalineforthepreventionofperitonealdialysisrelatedinfectionscosmopdtrialamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledprotocol
AT thavornkednapa comparativeeffectivenessoflocalapplicationofchlorhexidinegluconatemupirocinointmentandnormalsalineforthepreventionofperitonealdialysisrelatedinfectionscosmopdtrialamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledprotocol
AT comparativeeffectivenessoflocalapplicationofchlorhexidinegluconatemupirocinointmentandnormalsalineforthepreventionofperitonealdialysisrelatedinfectionscosmopdtrialamulticenterrandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledprotocol