Cargando…

Optimal in‐feed amino acid ratio for laying hens based on deletion method

A total of 56 Hy‐line W‐36 hens from 28 to 30 weeks were used on nitrogen balance (NB) trial to estimate daily N maintenance requirements (NMR) and the genetic potential for daily N retention (NR(max)T). The treatments consisted of six graded levels of nitrogen in the diets (N1 = 8; N2 = 16; N3 = 24...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Soares, Letícia, Sakomura, Nilva Kazue, Dorigam, Juliano Cesar de Paula, Liebert, Frank, Sunder, Angela, do Nascimento, Mariana Quintino, Leme, Bruno Balbino
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6924275/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30478953
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jpn.13021
_version_ 1783481696904019968
author Soares, Letícia
Sakomura, Nilva Kazue
Dorigam, Juliano Cesar de Paula
Liebert, Frank
Sunder, Angela
do Nascimento, Mariana Quintino
Leme, Bruno Balbino
author_facet Soares, Letícia
Sakomura, Nilva Kazue
Dorigam, Juliano Cesar de Paula
Liebert, Frank
Sunder, Angela
do Nascimento, Mariana Quintino
Leme, Bruno Balbino
author_sort Soares, Letícia
collection PubMed
description A total of 56 Hy‐line W‐36 hens from 28 to 30 weeks were used on nitrogen balance (NB) trial to estimate daily N maintenance requirements (NMR) and the genetic potential for daily N retention (NR(max)T). The treatments consisted of six graded levels of nitrogen in the diets (N1 = 8; N2 = 16; N3 = 24; N4 = 32; N5 = 40; and N6 = 48 g N/kg of feed), formulated using the dilution technique. The regression analyses between nitrogen intake and excretion were performed to fit the exponential function and to determine the NMR = 292 mg/BW(kg) (0.67), which was applied for further calculation of NR(max)T = 1,883 mg/BW(kg) (0.67). A second NB trial was conducted, and a total of 96 Hy‐line W‐36 hens were used in the same period to estimate the ideal amino acid ratio (IAAR). Twelve treatments with eight replicates and one bird per cage were used. A balanced diet (BD) was formulated to meet the IAAR and the requirement of other nutrients for pullets. The limiting diets were formulated diluting BD with cornstarch and refilled with synthetic AAs and other feed ingredients, except for the AA under study. In each trial, the data of nitrogen intake, excretion, deposition and retention were obtained in a NB trial. The IAAR determined by Goettingen approach was Lys 100, Met+Cys 88, Trp 21, Thr 69, Arg 109, Val 90, Ile 75, Leu 127, Phe+Tir 110, Gly+Ser 73 and His 29%. The IAAR determined by Louvain approach was Lys 100, Met+Cys 88, Trp 21, Thr 69, Arg 104, Val 91, Ile 78, Leu 121, Phe+Tir 119, Gly+Ser 77 and His 29%.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6924275
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69242752019-12-30 Optimal in‐feed amino acid ratio for laying hens based on deletion method Soares, Letícia Sakomura, Nilva Kazue Dorigam, Juliano Cesar de Paula Liebert, Frank Sunder, Angela do Nascimento, Mariana Quintino Leme, Bruno Balbino J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl) Original Articles A total of 56 Hy‐line W‐36 hens from 28 to 30 weeks were used on nitrogen balance (NB) trial to estimate daily N maintenance requirements (NMR) and the genetic potential for daily N retention (NR(max)T). The treatments consisted of six graded levels of nitrogen in the diets (N1 = 8; N2 = 16; N3 = 24; N4 = 32; N5 = 40; and N6 = 48 g N/kg of feed), formulated using the dilution technique. The regression analyses between nitrogen intake and excretion were performed to fit the exponential function and to determine the NMR = 292 mg/BW(kg) (0.67), which was applied for further calculation of NR(max)T = 1,883 mg/BW(kg) (0.67). A second NB trial was conducted, and a total of 96 Hy‐line W‐36 hens were used in the same period to estimate the ideal amino acid ratio (IAAR). Twelve treatments with eight replicates and one bird per cage were used. A balanced diet (BD) was formulated to meet the IAAR and the requirement of other nutrients for pullets. The limiting diets were formulated diluting BD with cornstarch and refilled with synthetic AAs and other feed ingredients, except for the AA under study. In each trial, the data of nitrogen intake, excretion, deposition and retention were obtained in a NB trial. The IAAR determined by Goettingen approach was Lys 100, Met+Cys 88, Trp 21, Thr 69, Arg 109, Val 90, Ile 75, Leu 127, Phe+Tir 110, Gly+Ser 73 and His 29%. The IAAR determined by Louvain approach was Lys 100, Met+Cys 88, Trp 21, Thr 69, Arg 104, Val 91, Ile 78, Leu 121, Phe+Tir 119, Gly+Ser 77 and His 29%. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-11-26 2019-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6924275/ /pubmed/30478953 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jpn.13021 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition Published by Blackwell Verlag GmbH. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Soares, Letícia
Sakomura, Nilva Kazue
Dorigam, Juliano Cesar de Paula
Liebert, Frank
Sunder, Angela
do Nascimento, Mariana Quintino
Leme, Bruno Balbino
Optimal in‐feed amino acid ratio for laying hens based on deletion method
title Optimal in‐feed amino acid ratio for laying hens based on deletion method
title_full Optimal in‐feed amino acid ratio for laying hens based on deletion method
title_fullStr Optimal in‐feed amino acid ratio for laying hens based on deletion method
title_full_unstemmed Optimal in‐feed amino acid ratio for laying hens based on deletion method
title_short Optimal in‐feed amino acid ratio for laying hens based on deletion method
title_sort optimal in‐feed amino acid ratio for laying hens based on deletion method
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6924275/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30478953
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jpn.13021
work_keys_str_mv AT soaresleticia optimalinfeedaminoacidratioforlayinghensbasedondeletionmethod
AT sakomuranilvakazue optimalinfeedaminoacidratioforlayinghensbasedondeletionmethod
AT dorigamjulianocesardepaula optimalinfeedaminoacidratioforlayinghensbasedondeletionmethod
AT liebertfrank optimalinfeedaminoacidratioforlayinghensbasedondeletionmethod
AT sunderangela optimalinfeedaminoacidratioforlayinghensbasedondeletionmethod
AT donascimentomarianaquintino optimalinfeedaminoacidratioforlayinghensbasedondeletionmethod
AT lemebrunobalbino optimalinfeedaminoacidratioforlayinghensbasedondeletionmethod