Cargando…

Atomoxetine and citalopram alter brain network organization in Parkinson’s disease

Parkinson’s disease has multiple detrimental effects on motor and cognitive systems in the brain. In contrast to motor deficits, cognitive impairments in Parkinson’s disease are usually not ameliorated, and can even be worsened, by dopaminergic treatments. Recent evidence has shown potential benefit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Borchert, Robin J, Rittman, Timothy, Rae, Charlotte L, Passamonti, Luca, Jones, Simon P, Vatansever, Deniz, Vázquez Rodríguez, Patricia, Ye, Zheng, Nombela, Cristina, Hughes, Laura E, Robbins, Trevor W, Rowe, James B
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6924537/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31886460
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcz013
_version_ 1783481741881638912
author Borchert, Robin J
Rittman, Timothy
Rae, Charlotte L
Passamonti, Luca
Jones, Simon P
Vatansever, Deniz
Vázquez Rodríguez, Patricia
Ye, Zheng
Nombela, Cristina
Hughes, Laura E
Robbins, Trevor W
Rowe, James B
author_facet Borchert, Robin J
Rittman, Timothy
Rae, Charlotte L
Passamonti, Luca
Jones, Simon P
Vatansever, Deniz
Vázquez Rodríguez, Patricia
Ye, Zheng
Nombela, Cristina
Hughes, Laura E
Robbins, Trevor W
Rowe, James B
author_sort Borchert, Robin J
collection PubMed
description Parkinson’s disease has multiple detrimental effects on motor and cognitive systems in the brain. In contrast to motor deficits, cognitive impairments in Parkinson’s disease are usually not ameliorated, and can even be worsened, by dopaminergic treatments. Recent evidence has shown potential benefits from restoring other neurotransmitter deficits, including noradrenergic and serotonergic transmission. Here, we study global and regional brain network organization using task-free imaging (also known as resting-state), which minimizes performance confounds and the bias towards predetermined networks. Thirty-three patients with idiopathic Parkinson’s disease were studied three times in a double-blinded, placebo-controlled counter-balanced crossover design, following placebo, 40 mg oral atomoxetine (selective noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor) or 30 mg oral citalopram (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor). Neuropsychological assessments were performed outside the scanner. Seventy-six controls were scanned without medication to provide normative data for comparison to the patient cohort. Graph theoretical analysis of task-free brain connectivity, with a random 500-node parcellation, was used to measure the effect of disease in placebo-treated state (versus unmedicated controls) and pharmacological intervention (drug versus placebo). Relative to controls, patients on placebo had executive impairments (reduced fluency and inhibitory control), which was reflected in dysfunctional network dynamics in terms of reduced clustering coefficient, hub degree and hub centrality. In patients, atomoxetine improved fluency in proportion to plasma concentration (P = 0.006, r(2) = 0.24), and improved response inhibition in proportion to increased hub Eigen centrality (P = 0.044, r(2) = 0.14). Citalopram did not improve fluency or inhibitory control, but its influence on network integration and efficiency depended on disease severity: clustering (P = 0.01, r(2) = 0.22), modularity (P = 0.043, r(2) = 0.14) and path length (P = 0.006, r(2) = 0.25) increased in patients with milder forms of Parkinson’s disease, but decreased in patients with more advanced disease (Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale motor subscale part III > 30). This study supports the use of task-free imaging of brain networks in translational pharmacology of neurodegenerative disorders. We propose that hub connectivity contributes to cognitive performance in Parkinson’s disease, and that noradrenergic treatment strategies can partially restore the neural systems supporting executive function.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6924537
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69245372019-12-26 Atomoxetine and citalopram alter brain network organization in Parkinson’s disease Borchert, Robin J Rittman, Timothy Rae, Charlotte L Passamonti, Luca Jones, Simon P Vatansever, Deniz Vázquez Rodríguez, Patricia Ye, Zheng Nombela, Cristina Hughes, Laura E Robbins, Trevor W Rowe, James B Brain Commun Original Article Parkinson’s disease has multiple detrimental effects on motor and cognitive systems in the brain. In contrast to motor deficits, cognitive impairments in Parkinson’s disease are usually not ameliorated, and can even be worsened, by dopaminergic treatments. Recent evidence has shown potential benefits from restoring other neurotransmitter deficits, including noradrenergic and serotonergic transmission. Here, we study global and regional brain network organization using task-free imaging (also known as resting-state), which minimizes performance confounds and the bias towards predetermined networks. Thirty-three patients with idiopathic Parkinson’s disease were studied three times in a double-blinded, placebo-controlled counter-balanced crossover design, following placebo, 40 mg oral atomoxetine (selective noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor) or 30 mg oral citalopram (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor). Neuropsychological assessments were performed outside the scanner. Seventy-six controls were scanned without medication to provide normative data for comparison to the patient cohort. Graph theoretical analysis of task-free brain connectivity, with a random 500-node parcellation, was used to measure the effect of disease in placebo-treated state (versus unmedicated controls) and pharmacological intervention (drug versus placebo). Relative to controls, patients on placebo had executive impairments (reduced fluency and inhibitory control), which was reflected in dysfunctional network dynamics in terms of reduced clustering coefficient, hub degree and hub centrality. In patients, atomoxetine improved fluency in proportion to plasma concentration (P = 0.006, r(2) = 0.24), and improved response inhibition in proportion to increased hub Eigen centrality (P = 0.044, r(2) = 0.14). Citalopram did not improve fluency or inhibitory control, but its influence on network integration and efficiency depended on disease severity: clustering (P = 0.01, r(2) = 0.22), modularity (P = 0.043, r(2) = 0.14) and path length (P = 0.006, r(2) = 0.25) increased in patients with milder forms of Parkinson’s disease, but decreased in patients with more advanced disease (Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale motor subscale part III > 30). This study supports the use of task-free imaging of brain networks in translational pharmacology of neurodegenerative disorders. We propose that hub connectivity contributes to cognitive performance in Parkinson’s disease, and that noradrenergic treatment strategies can partially restore the neural systems supporting executive function. Oxford University Press 2019-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6924537/ /pubmed/31886460 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcz013 Text en © The Author(s) (2019). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Borchert, Robin J
Rittman, Timothy
Rae, Charlotte L
Passamonti, Luca
Jones, Simon P
Vatansever, Deniz
Vázquez Rodríguez, Patricia
Ye, Zheng
Nombela, Cristina
Hughes, Laura E
Robbins, Trevor W
Rowe, James B
Atomoxetine and citalopram alter brain network organization in Parkinson’s disease
title Atomoxetine and citalopram alter brain network organization in Parkinson’s disease
title_full Atomoxetine and citalopram alter brain network organization in Parkinson’s disease
title_fullStr Atomoxetine and citalopram alter brain network organization in Parkinson’s disease
title_full_unstemmed Atomoxetine and citalopram alter brain network organization in Parkinson’s disease
title_short Atomoxetine and citalopram alter brain network organization in Parkinson’s disease
title_sort atomoxetine and citalopram alter brain network organization in parkinson’s disease
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6924537/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31886460
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcz013
work_keys_str_mv AT borchertrobinj atomoxetineandcitalopramalterbrainnetworkorganizationinparkinsonsdisease
AT rittmantimothy atomoxetineandcitalopramalterbrainnetworkorganizationinparkinsonsdisease
AT raecharlottel atomoxetineandcitalopramalterbrainnetworkorganizationinparkinsonsdisease
AT passamontiluca atomoxetineandcitalopramalterbrainnetworkorganizationinparkinsonsdisease
AT jonessimonp atomoxetineandcitalopramalterbrainnetworkorganizationinparkinsonsdisease
AT vatanseverdeniz atomoxetineandcitalopramalterbrainnetworkorganizationinparkinsonsdisease
AT vazquezrodriguezpatricia atomoxetineandcitalopramalterbrainnetworkorganizationinparkinsonsdisease
AT yezheng atomoxetineandcitalopramalterbrainnetworkorganizationinparkinsonsdisease
AT nombelacristina atomoxetineandcitalopramalterbrainnetworkorganizationinparkinsonsdisease
AT hugheslaurae atomoxetineandcitalopramalterbrainnetworkorganizationinparkinsonsdisease
AT robbinstrevorw atomoxetineandcitalopramalterbrainnetworkorganizationinparkinsonsdisease
AT rowejamesb atomoxetineandcitalopramalterbrainnetworkorganizationinparkinsonsdisease