Cargando…
Comparison of quality control methods for automated diffusion tensor imaging analysis pipelines
The processing of brain diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) data for large cohort studies requires fully automatic pipelines to perform quality control (QC) and artifact/outlier removal procedures on the raw DTI data prior to calculation of diffusion parameters. In this study, three automatic DTI process...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6924651/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31860686 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226715 |
_version_ | 1783481756922413056 |
---|---|
author | Haddad, Seyyed M. H. Scott, Christopher J. M. Ozzoude, Miracle Holmes, Melissa F. Arnott, Stephen R. Nanayakkara, Nuwan D. Ramirez, Joel Black, Sandra E. Dowlatshahi, Dar Strother, Stephen C. Swartz, Richard H. Symons, Sean Montero-Odasso, Manuel Bartha, Robert |
author_facet | Haddad, Seyyed M. H. Scott, Christopher J. M. Ozzoude, Miracle Holmes, Melissa F. Arnott, Stephen R. Nanayakkara, Nuwan D. Ramirez, Joel Black, Sandra E. Dowlatshahi, Dar Strother, Stephen C. Swartz, Richard H. Symons, Sean Montero-Odasso, Manuel Bartha, Robert |
author_sort | Haddad, Seyyed M. H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The processing of brain diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) data for large cohort studies requires fully automatic pipelines to perform quality control (QC) and artifact/outlier removal procedures on the raw DTI data prior to calculation of diffusion parameters. In this study, three automatic DTI processing pipelines, each complying with the general ENIGMA framework, were designed by uniquely combining multiple image processing software tools. Different QC procedures based on the RESTORE algorithm, the DTIPrep protocol, and a combination of both methods were compared using simulated ground truth and artifact containing DTI datasets modeling eddy current induced distortions, various levels of motion artifacts, and thermal noise. Variability was also examined in 20 DTI datasets acquired in subjects with vascular cognitive impairment (VCI) from the multi-site Ontario Neurodegenerative Disease Research Initiative (ONDRI). The mean fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), axial diffusivity (AD), and radial diffusivity (RD) were calculated in global brain grey matter (GM) and white matter (WM) regions. For the simulated DTI datasets, the measure used to evaluate the performance of the pipelines was the normalized difference between the mean DTI metrics measured in GM and WM regions and the corresponding ground truth DTI value. The performance of the proposed pipelines was very similar, particularly in FA measurements. However, the pipeline based on the RESTORE algorithm was the most accurate when analyzing the artifact containing DTI datasets. The pipeline that combined the DTIPrep protocol and the RESTORE algorithm produced the lowest standard deviation in FA measurements in normal appearing WM across subjects. We concluded that this pipeline was the most robust and is preferred for automated analysis of multisite brain DTI data. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6924651 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69246512020-01-07 Comparison of quality control methods for automated diffusion tensor imaging analysis pipelines Haddad, Seyyed M. H. Scott, Christopher J. M. Ozzoude, Miracle Holmes, Melissa F. Arnott, Stephen R. Nanayakkara, Nuwan D. Ramirez, Joel Black, Sandra E. Dowlatshahi, Dar Strother, Stephen C. Swartz, Richard H. Symons, Sean Montero-Odasso, Manuel Bartha, Robert PLoS One Research Article The processing of brain diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) data for large cohort studies requires fully automatic pipelines to perform quality control (QC) and artifact/outlier removal procedures on the raw DTI data prior to calculation of diffusion parameters. In this study, three automatic DTI processing pipelines, each complying with the general ENIGMA framework, were designed by uniquely combining multiple image processing software tools. Different QC procedures based on the RESTORE algorithm, the DTIPrep protocol, and a combination of both methods were compared using simulated ground truth and artifact containing DTI datasets modeling eddy current induced distortions, various levels of motion artifacts, and thermal noise. Variability was also examined in 20 DTI datasets acquired in subjects with vascular cognitive impairment (VCI) from the multi-site Ontario Neurodegenerative Disease Research Initiative (ONDRI). The mean fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), axial diffusivity (AD), and radial diffusivity (RD) were calculated in global brain grey matter (GM) and white matter (WM) regions. For the simulated DTI datasets, the measure used to evaluate the performance of the pipelines was the normalized difference between the mean DTI metrics measured in GM and WM regions and the corresponding ground truth DTI value. The performance of the proposed pipelines was very similar, particularly in FA measurements. However, the pipeline based on the RESTORE algorithm was the most accurate when analyzing the artifact containing DTI datasets. The pipeline that combined the DTIPrep protocol and the RESTORE algorithm produced the lowest standard deviation in FA measurements in normal appearing WM across subjects. We concluded that this pipeline was the most robust and is preferred for automated analysis of multisite brain DTI data. Public Library of Science 2019-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6924651/ /pubmed/31860686 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226715 Text en © 2019 Haddad et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Haddad, Seyyed M. H. Scott, Christopher J. M. Ozzoude, Miracle Holmes, Melissa F. Arnott, Stephen R. Nanayakkara, Nuwan D. Ramirez, Joel Black, Sandra E. Dowlatshahi, Dar Strother, Stephen C. Swartz, Richard H. Symons, Sean Montero-Odasso, Manuel Bartha, Robert Comparison of quality control methods for automated diffusion tensor imaging analysis pipelines |
title | Comparison of quality control methods for automated diffusion tensor imaging analysis pipelines |
title_full | Comparison of quality control methods for automated diffusion tensor imaging analysis pipelines |
title_fullStr | Comparison of quality control methods for automated diffusion tensor imaging analysis pipelines |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of quality control methods for automated diffusion tensor imaging analysis pipelines |
title_short | Comparison of quality control methods for automated diffusion tensor imaging analysis pipelines |
title_sort | comparison of quality control methods for automated diffusion tensor imaging analysis pipelines |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6924651/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31860686 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226715 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT haddadseyyedmh comparisonofqualitycontrolmethodsforautomateddiffusiontensorimaginganalysispipelines AT scottchristopherjm comparisonofqualitycontrolmethodsforautomateddiffusiontensorimaginganalysispipelines AT ozzoudemiracle comparisonofqualitycontrolmethodsforautomateddiffusiontensorimaginganalysispipelines AT holmesmelissaf comparisonofqualitycontrolmethodsforautomateddiffusiontensorimaginganalysispipelines AT arnottstephenr comparisonofqualitycontrolmethodsforautomateddiffusiontensorimaginganalysispipelines AT nanayakkaranuwand comparisonofqualitycontrolmethodsforautomateddiffusiontensorimaginganalysispipelines AT ramirezjoel comparisonofqualitycontrolmethodsforautomateddiffusiontensorimaginganalysispipelines AT blacksandrae comparisonofqualitycontrolmethodsforautomateddiffusiontensorimaginganalysispipelines AT dowlatshahidar comparisonofqualitycontrolmethodsforautomateddiffusiontensorimaginganalysispipelines AT strotherstephenc comparisonofqualitycontrolmethodsforautomateddiffusiontensorimaginganalysispipelines AT swartzrichardh comparisonofqualitycontrolmethodsforautomateddiffusiontensorimaginganalysispipelines AT symonssean comparisonofqualitycontrolmethodsforautomateddiffusiontensorimaginganalysispipelines AT monteroodassomanuel comparisonofqualitycontrolmethodsforautomateddiffusiontensorimaginganalysispipelines AT comparisonofqualitycontrolmethodsforautomateddiffusiontensorimaginganalysispipelines AT bartharobert comparisonofqualitycontrolmethodsforautomateddiffusiontensorimaginganalysispipelines |