Cargando…

Optimization of Fetal Biometry With 3D Ultrasound and Image Recognition (EPICEA): protocol for a prospective cross-sectional study

CONTEXT: Variability in 2D ultrasound (US) is related to the acquisition of planes of reference and the positioning of callipers and could be reduced in combining US volume acquisitions and anatomical structures recognition. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective is to assess the consistency between 3D m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ambroise Grandjean, Gaëlle, Hossu, Gabriela, Banasiak, Claire, Ciofolo-Veit, Cybele, Raynaud, Caroline, Rouet, Laurence, Morel, Olivier, Beaumont, Marine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6924693/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31843832
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031777
_version_ 1783481766865010688
author Ambroise Grandjean, Gaëlle
Hossu, Gabriela
Banasiak, Claire
Ciofolo-Veit, Cybele
Raynaud, Caroline
Rouet, Laurence
Morel, Olivier
Beaumont, Marine
author_facet Ambroise Grandjean, Gaëlle
Hossu, Gabriela
Banasiak, Claire
Ciofolo-Veit, Cybele
Raynaud, Caroline
Rouet, Laurence
Morel, Olivier
Beaumont, Marine
author_sort Ambroise Grandjean, Gaëlle
collection PubMed
description CONTEXT: Variability in 2D ultrasound (US) is related to the acquisition of planes of reference and the positioning of callipers and could be reduced in combining US volume acquisitions and anatomical structures recognition. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective is to assess the consistency between 3D measurements (automated and manual) extracted from a fetal US volume with standard 2D US measurements (I). Secondary objectives are to evaluate the feasibility of the use of software to obtain automated measurements of the fetal head, abdomen and femur from US acquisitions (II) and to assess the impact of automation on intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility (III). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: 225 fetuses will be measured at 16–30 weeks of gestation. For each fetus, six volumes (two for head, abdomen and thigh, respectively) will be prospectively acquired after performing standard 2D biometry measurements (head and abdominal circumference, femoral length). Each volume will be processed later by both a software and an operator to extract the reference planes and to perform the corresponding measurements. The different sets of measurements will be compared using Bland-Altman plots to assess the agreement between the different processes (I). The feasibility of using the software in clinical practice will be assessed through the failure rate of processing and the score of quality of measurements (II). Interclass correlation coefficients will be used to evaluate the intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility (III). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study and related consent forms were approved by an institutional review board (CPP SUD-EST 3) on 2 October 2018, under reference number 2018–033 B. The study has been registered in https://clinicaltrials.gov registry on 23 January 2019, under the number NCT03812471. This study will enable an improved understanding and dissemination of the potential benefits of 3D automated measurements and is a prerequisite for the design of intention to treat randomised studies assessing their impact. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03812471; Pre-results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6924693
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69246932020-01-02 Optimization of Fetal Biometry With 3D Ultrasound and Image Recognition (EPICEA): protocol for a prospective cross-sectional study Ambroise Grandjean, Gaëlle Hossu, Gabriela Banasiak, Claire Ciofolo-Veit, Cybele Raynaud, Caroline Rouet, Laurence Morel, Olivier Beaumont, Marine BMJ Open Obstetrics and Gynaecology CONTEXT: Variability in 2D ultrasound (US) is related to the acquisition of planes of reference and the positioning of callipers and could be reduced in combining US volume acquisitions and anatomical structures recognition. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective is to assess the consistency between 3D measurements (automated and manual) extracted from a fetal US volume with standard 2D US measurements (I). Secondary objectives are to evaluate the feasibility of the use of software to obtain automated measurements of the fetal head, abdomen and femur from US acquisitions (II) and to assess the impact of automation on intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility (III). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: 225 fetuses will be measured at 16–30 weeks of gestation. For each fetus, six volumes (two for head, abdomen and thigh, respectively) will be prospectively acquired after performing standard 2D biometry measurements (head and abdominal circumference, femoral length). Each volume will be processed later by both a software and an operator to extract the reference planes and to perform the corresponding measurements. The different sets of measurements will be compared using Bland-Altman plots to assess the agreement between the different processes (I). The feasibility of using the software in clinical practice will be assessed through the failure rate of processing and the score of quality of measurements (II). Interclass correlation coefficients will be used to evaluate the intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility (III). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study and related consent forms were approved by an institutional review board (CPP SUD-EST 3) on 2 October 2018, under reference number 2018–033 B. The study has been registered in https://clinicaltrials.gov registry on 23 January 2019, under the number NCT03812471. This study will enable an improved understanding and dissemination of the potential benefits of 3D automated measurements and is a prerequisite for the design of intention to treat randomised studies assessing their impact. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03812471; Pre-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6924693/ /pubmed/31843832 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031777 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Ambroise Grandjean, Gaëlle
Hossu, Gabriela
Banasiak, Claire
Ciofolo-Veit, Cybele
Raynaud, Caroline
Rouet, Laurence
Morel, Olivier
Beaumont, Marine
Optimization of Fetal Biometry With 3D Ultrasound and Image Recognition (EPICEA): protocol for a prospective cross-sectional study
title Optimization of Fetal Biometry With 3D Ultrasound and Image Recognition (EPICEA): protocol for a prospective cross-sectional study
title_full Optimization of Fetal Biometry With 3D Ultrasound and Image Recognition (EPICEA): protocol for a prospective cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Optimization of Fetal Biometry With 3D Ultrasound and Image Recognition (EPICEA): protocol for a prospective cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Optimization of Fetal Biometry With 3D Ultrasound and Image Recognition (EPICEA): protocol for a prospective cross-sectional study
title_short Optimization of Fetal Biometry With 3D Ultrasound and Image Recognition (EPICEA): protocol for a prospective cross-sectional study
title_sort optimization of fetal biometry with 3d ultrasound and image recognition (epicea): protocol for a prospective cross-sectional study
topic Obstetrics and Gynaecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6924693/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31843832
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031777
work_keys_str_mv AT ambroisegrandjeangaelle optimizationoffetalbiometrywith3dultrasoundandimagerecognitionepiceaprotocolforaprospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT hossugabriela optimizationoffetalbiometrywith3dultrasoundandimagerecognitionepiceaprotocolforaprospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT banasiakclaire optimizationoffetalbiometrywith3dultrasoundandimagerecognitionepiceaprotocolforaprospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT ciofoloveitcybele optimizationoffetalbiometrywith3dultrasoundandimagerecognitionepiceaprotocolforaprospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT raynaudcaroline optimizationoffetalbiometrywith3dultrasoundandimagerecognitionepiceaprotocolforaprospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT rouetlaurence optimizationoffetalbiometrywith3dultrasoundandimagerecognitionepiceaprotocolforaprospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT morelolivier optimizationoffetalbiometrywith3dultrasoundandimagerecognitionepiceaprotocolforaprospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT beaumontmarine optimizationoffetalbiometrywith3dultrasoundandimagerecognitionepiceaprotocolforaprospectivecrosssectionalstudy