Cargando…

Effectiveness and reporting standards of psychological interventions for improving short-term and long-term pain outcomes after total knee replacement: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness and reporting standards of psychological interventions for improving outcomes after total knee replacement (TKR). DESIGN: Medline, Embase, and PsycINFO were searched from inception to up to 9 May 2019 with no language restrictions applied. Randomised controlle...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Whale, Katie, Wylde, Vikki, Beswick, Andrew, Rathbone, James, Vedhara, Kavita, Gooberman-Hill, Rachael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6924731/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31806606
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029742
_version_ 1783481775905832960
author Whale, Katie
Wylde, Vikki
Beswick, Andrew
Rathbone, James
Vedhara, Kavita
Gooberman-Hill, Rachael
author_facet Whale, Katie
Wylde, Vikki
Beswick, Andrew
Rathbone, James
Vedhara, Kavita
Gooberman-Hill, Rachael
author_sort Whale, Katie
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness and reporting standards of psychological interventions for improving outcomes after total knee replacement (TKR). DESIGN: Medline, Embase, and PsycINFO were searched from inception to up to 9 May 2019 with no language restrictions applied. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effectiveness of psychological interventions for short-term and long-term postoperative pain after TKR were included. Screening, data extraction, and assessment of methodological quality were performed in duplicate by two reviewers. The primary effectiveness outcome was postoperative pain severity and the primary harm outcome was serious adverse events. Secondary outcomes included function, quality of life, and psychological well-being. Reporting standards were assessed using the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist for intervention reporting. RESULTS: 12 RCTs were included, with a total of 1299 participants. Psychological interventions comprised music therapy (five studies), guided imagery and music (one study), hypnosis (one study), progressive muscle relaxation with biofeedback (one study), pain coping skills programme (one study), cognitive–behavioural therapy (two studies), and a postoperative management programme (one study). Due to the high heterogeneity of interventions and poor reporting of harms data, it was not possible to make any definitive statements about the overall effectiveness or safety of psychology interventions for pain outcomes after TKR. CONCLUSION: Further evidence about the effectiveness of psychological interventions for improving pain outcomes after TKR is needed. The reporting of harm outcomes and intervention fidelity is currently poor and could be improved. Future work exploring the impact of intervention timing on effectiveness and whether different psychological approaches are needed to address acute postoperative pain and chronic postoperative pain would be of benefit. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018095100.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6924731
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69247312020-01-02 Effectiveness and reporting standards of psychological interventions for improving short-term and long-term pain outcomes after total knee replacement: a systematic review Whale, Katie Wylde, Vikki Beswick, Andrew Rathbone, James Vedhara, Kavita Gooberman-Hill, Rachael BMJ Open Surgery OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness and reporting standards of psychological interventions for improving outcomes after total knee replacement (TKR). DESIGN: Medline, Embase, and PsycINFO were searched from inception to up to 9 May 2019 with no language restrictions applied. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effectiveness of psychological interventions for short-term and long-term postoperative pain after TKR were included. Screening, data extraction, and assessment of methodological quality were performed in duplicate by two reviewers. The primary effectiveness outcome was postoperative pain severity and the primary harm outcome was serious adverse events. Secondary outcomes included function, quality of life, and psychological well-being. Reporting standards were assessed using the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist for intervention reporting. RESULTS: 12 RCTs were included, with a total of 1299 participants. Psychological interventions comprised music therapy (five studies), guided imagery and music (one study), hypnosis (one study), progressive muscle relaxation with biofeedback (one study), pain coping skills programme (one study), cognitive–behavioural therapy (two studies), and a postoperative management programme (one study). Due to the high heterogeneity of interventions and poor reporting of harms data, it was not possible to make any definitive statements about the overall effectiveness or safety of psychology interventions for pain outcomes after TKR. CONCLUSION: Further evidence about the effectiveness of psychological interventions for improving pain outcomes after TKR is needed. The reporting of harm outcomes and intervention fidelity is currently poor and could be improved. Future work exploring the impact of intervention timing on effectiveness and whether different psychological approaches are needed to address acute postoperative pain and chronic postoperative pain would be of benefit. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018095100. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6924731/ /pubmed/31806606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029742 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Surgery
Whale, Katie
Wylde, Vikki
Beswick, Andrew
Rathbone, James
Vedhara, Kavita
Gooberman-Hill, Rachael
Effectiveness and reporting standards of psychological interventions for improving short-term and long-term pain outcomes after total knee replacement: a systematic review
title Effectiveness and reporting standards of psychological interventions for improving short-term and long-term pain outcomes after total knee replacement: a systematic review
title_full Effectiveness and reporting standards of psychological interventions for improving short-term and long-term pain outcomes after total knee replacement: a systematic review
title_fullStr Effectiveness and reporting standards of psychological interventions for improving short-term and long-term pain outcomes after total knee replacement: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness and reporting standards of psychological interventions for improving short-term and long-term pain outcomes after total knee replacement: a systematic review
title_short Effectiveness and reporting standards of psychological interventions for improving short-term and long-term pain outcomes after total knee replacement: a systematic review
title_sort effectiveness and reporting standards of psychological interventions for improving short-term and long-term pain outcomes after total knee replacement: a systematic review
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6924731/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31806606
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029742
work_keys_str_mv AT whalekatie effectivenessandreportingstandardsofpsychologicalinterventionsforimprovingshorttermandlongtermpainoutcomesaftertotalkneereplacementasystematicreview
AT wyldevikki effectivenessandreportingstandardsofpsychologicalinterventionsforimprovingshorttermandlongtermpainoutcomesaftertotalkneereplacementasystematicreview
AT beswickandrew effectivenessandreportingstandardsofpsychologicalinterventionsforimprovingshorttermandlongtermpainoutcomesaftertotalkneereplacementasystematicreview
AT rathbonejames effectivenessandreportingstandardsofpsychologicalinterventionsforimprovingshorttermandlongtermpainoutcomesaftertotalkneereplacementasystematicreview
AT vedharakavita effectivenessandreportingstandardsofpsychologicalinterventionsforimprovingshorttermandlongtermpainoutcomesaftertotalkneereplacementasystematicreview
AT goobermanhillrachael effectivenessandreportingstandardsofpsychologicalinterventionsforimprovingshorttermandlongtermpainoutcomesaftertotalkneereplacementasystematicreview