Cargando…

Acceptability to patients of screening disposable transnasal endoscopy: qualitative interview analysis

OBJECTIVES: Screening in selected high risk populations for Barrett’s oesophagus (BO) and oesophageal varices (OVs) has been proposed, but there are obstacles with conventional oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (C-OGD), including patient acceptability. Portable and disposable office-based transnasal endos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McGoran, John, Bennett, Andrea, Cooper, Joanne, De Caestecker, John, Lovat, Laurence B, Guha, Neil, Ragunath, Krish, Sami, Sarmed S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6924752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31831531
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030467
_version_ 1783481780928512000
author McGoran, John
Bennett, Andrea
Cooper, Joanne
De Caestecker, John
Lovat, Laurence B
Guha, Neil
Ragunath, Krish
Sami, Sarmed S
author_facet McGoran, John
Bennett, Andrea
Cooper, Joanne
De Caestecker, John
Lovat, Laurence B
Guha, Neil
Ragunath, Krish
Sami, Sarmed S
author_sort McGoran, John
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Screening in selected high risk populations for Barrett’s oesophagus (BO) and oesophageal varices (OVs) has been proposed, but there are obstacles with conventional oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (C-OGD), including patient acceptability. Portable and disposable office-based transnasal endoscopy (TNE) is a feasible and accurate alternative to C-OGD that may have use in primary and secondary care. This article outlines a qualitative analysis of patient experiences of TNE and C-OGD in order to gain an insight into an acceptable delivery of an endoscopic screening service. DESIGN: Purposeful sampling identified 23 participants who then underwent semi-structured interviews to determine their experiences of both procedures. Thematic analysis was conducted to derive meaning from their lived experiences. SETTING: A secondary care endoscopy unit, clinic room and interview room. PARTICIPANTS: Patients referred for BO or OV surveillance and for endoscopy to investigate dyspepsia underwent unsedated TNE using the EG Scan II device followed by C-OGD with or without sedation (patient choice), as part of a clinical trial. RESULTS: The themes that arose from our analysis were: inclusivity in one’s own healthcare, comfort level and convenience, validity of the procedure and application to a screening population and a sense of altruism and reciprocity. Positive aspects of TNE included participant empowerment, reduced discomfort and avoidance of conscious sedation. Participants felt that if TNE screening was of proven efficacy it would be welcomed, though views on use in a community setting were mixed. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients preferred TNE to unsedated C-OGD and the reasons they gave featured strongly in the emerging themes. Preferences between TNE and sedated C-OGD were more subtle, with equivalent comfort scores but merits and drawbacks of both being discussed. This information identifies opportunities and challenges in establishing an endoscopic screening service. Trial registration number ISRCTNregistry identifier: 70595405; Pre-results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6924752
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69247522020-01-02 Acceptability to patients of screening disposable transnasal endoscopy: qualitative interview analysis McGoran, John Bennett, Andrea Cooper, Joanne De Caestecker, John Lovat, Laurence B Guha, Neil Ragunath, Krish Sami, Sarmed S BMJ Open Gastroenterology and Hepatology OBJECTIVES: Screening in selected high risk populations for Barrett’s oesophagus (BO) and oesophageal varices (OVs) has been proposed, but there are obstacles with conventional oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (C-OGD), including patient acceptability. Portable and disposable office-based transnasal endoscopy (TNE) is a feasible and accurate alternative to C-OGD that may have use in primary and secondary care. This article outlines a qualitative analysis of patient experiences of TNE and C-OGD in order to gain an insight into an acceptable delivery of an endoscopic screening service. DESIGN: Purposeful sampling identified 23 participants who then underwent semi-structured interviews to determine their experiences of both procedures. Thematic analysis was conducted to derive meaning from their lived experiences. SETTING: A secondary care endoscopy unit, clinic room and interview room. PARTICIPANTS: Patients referred for BO or OV surveillance and for endoscopy to investigate dyspepsia underwent unsedated TNE using the EG Scan II device followed by C-OGD with or without sedation (patient choice), as part of a clinical trial. RESULTS: The themes that arose from our analysis were: inclusivity in one’s own healthcare, comfort level and convenience, validity of the procedure and application to a screening population and a sense of altruism and reciprocity. Positive aspects of TNE included participant empowerment, reduced discomfort and avoidance of conscious sedation. Participants felt that if TNE screening was of proven efficacy it would be welcomed, though views on use in a community setting were mixed. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients preferred TNE to unsedated C-OGD and the reasons they gave featured strongly in the emerging themes. Preferences between TNE and sedated C-OGD were more subtle, with equivalent comfort scores but merits and drawbacks of both being discussed. This information identifies opportunities and challenges in establishing an endoscopic screening service. Trial registration number ISRCTNregistry identifier: 70595405; Pre-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6924752/ /pubmed/31831531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030467 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Gastroenterology and Hepatology
McGoran, John
Bennett, Andrea
Cooper, Joanne
De Caestecker, John
Lovat, Laurence B
Guha, Neil
Ragunath, Krish
Sami, Sarmed S
Acceptability to patients of screening disposable transnasal endoscopy: qualitative interview analysis
title Acceptability to patients of screening disposable transnasal endoscopy: qualitative interview analysis
title_full Acceptability to patients of screening disposable transnasal endoscopy: qualitative interview analysis
title_fullStr Acceptability to patients of screening disposable transnasal endoscopy: qualitative interview analysis
title_full_unstemmed Acceptability to patients of screening disposable transnasal endoscopy: qualitative interview analysis
title_short Acceptability to patients of screening disposable transnasal endoscopy: qualitative interview analysis
title_sort acceptability to patients of screening disposable transnasal endoscopy: qualitative interview analysis
topic Gastroenterology and Hepatology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6924752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31831531
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030467
work_keys_str_mv AT mcgoranjohn acceptabilitytopatientsofscreeningdisposabletransnasalendoscopyqualitativeinterviewanalysis
AT bennettandrea acceptabilitytopatientsofscreeningdisposabletransnasalendoscopyqualitativeinterviewanalysis
AT cooperjoanne acceptabilitytopatientsofscreeningdisposabletransnasalendoscopyqualitativeinterviewanalysis
AT decaesteckerjohn acceptabilitytopatientsofscreeningdisposabletransnasalendoscopyqualitativeinterviewanalysis
AT lovatlaurenceb acceptabilitytopatientsofscreeningdisposabletransnasalendoscopyqualitativeinterviewanalysis
AT guhaneil acceptabilitytopatientsofscreeningdisposabletransnasalendoscopyqualitativeinterviewanalysis
AT ragunathkrish acceptabilitytopatientsofscreeningdisposabletransnasalendoscopyqualitativeinterviewanalysis
AT samisarmeds acceptabilitytopatientsofscreeningdisposabletransnasalendoscopyqualitativeinterviewanalysis