Cargando…
Finding the best fit: examining the decision-making of augmentative and alternative communication professionals in the UK using a discrete choice experiment
OBJECTIVES: Many children with varied disabilities, for example, cerebral palsy, autism, can benefit from augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) systems. However, little is known about professionals’ decision-making when recommending symbol based AAC systems for children. This study examin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6924798/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31791963 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030274 |
_version_ | 1783481791697387520 |
---|---|
author | Webb, Edward J D Lynch, Yvonne Meads, David Judge, Simon Randall, Nicola Goldbart, Juliet Meredith, Stuart Moulam, Liz Hess, Stephane Murray, Janice |
author_facet | Webb, Edward J D Lynch, Yvonne Meads, David Judge, Simon Randall, Nicola Goldbart, Juliet Meredith, Stuart Moulam, Liz Hess, Stephane Murray, Janice |
author_sort | Webb, Edward J D |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Many children with varied disabilities, for example, cerebral palsy, autism, can benefit from augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) systems. However, little is known about professionals’ decision-making when recommending symbol based AAC systems for children. This study examines AAC professionals’ preferences for attributes of AAC systems and how they interact with child characteristics. DESIGN: AAC professionals answered a discrete choice experiment survey with AAC system and child-related attributes, where participants chose an AAC system for a child vignette. SETTING: The survey was administered online in the UK. PARTICIPANTS: 155 UK-based AAC professionals were recruited between 20 October 2017 and 4 March 2018. OUTCOMES: The study outcomes were the preferences of AAC professionals’ as quantified using a mixed logit model, with model selection performed using a step-wise procedure and the Bayesian Information Criterion. RESULTS: Significant differences were observed in preferences for AAC system attributes, and large interactions were seen between child attributes included in the child vignettes, for example, participants made more ambitious choices for children who were motivated to communicate using AAC, and predicted to progress in skills and abilities. These characteristics were perceived as relatively more important than language ability and previous AAC experience. CONCLUSIONS: AAC professionals make trade-offs between attributes of AAC systems, and these trade-offs change depending on the characteristics of the child for whom the system is being provided. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6924798 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69247982020-01-02 Finding the best fit: examining the decision-making of augmentative and alternative communication professionals in the UK using a discrete choice experiment Webb, Edward J D Lynch, Yvonne Meads, David Judge, Simon Randall, Nicola Goldbart, Juliet Meredith, Stuart Moulam, Liz Hess, Stephane Murray, Janice BMJ Open Communication OBJECTIVES: Many children with varied disabilities, for example, cerebral palsy, autism, can benefit from augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) systems. However, little is known about professionals’ decision-making when recommending symbol based AAC systems for children. This study examines AAC professionals’ preferences for attributes of AAC systems and how they interact with child characteristics. DESIGN: AAC professionals answered a discrete choice experiment survey with AAC system and child-related attributes, where participants chose an AAC system for a child vignette. SETTING: The survey was administered online in the UK. PARTICIPANTS: 155 UK-based AAC professionals were recruited between 20 October 2017 and 4 March 2018. OUTCOMES: The study outcomes were the preferences of AAC professionals’ as quantified using a mixed logit model, with model selection performed using a step-wise procedure and the Bayesian Information Criterion. RESULTS: Significant differences were observed in preferences for AAC system attributes, and large interactions were seen between child attributes included in the child vignettes, for example, participants made more ambitious choices for children who were motivated to communicate using AAC, and predicted to progress in skills and abilities. These characteristics were perceived as relatively more important than language ability and previous AAC experience. CONCLUSIONS: AAC professionals make trade-offs between attributes of AAC systems, and these trade-offs change depending on the characteristics of the child for whom the system is being provided. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6924798/ /pubmed/31791963 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030274 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Communication Webb, Edward J D Lynch, Yvonne Meads, David Judge, Simon Randall, Nicola Goldbart, Juliet Meredith, Stuart Moulam, Liz Hess, Stephane Murray, Janice Finding the best fit: examining the decision-making of augmentative and alternative communication professionals in the UK using a discrete choice experiment |
title | Finding the best fit: examining the decision-making of augmentative and alternative communication professionals in the UK using a discrete choice experiment |
title_full | Finding the best fit: examining the decision-making of augmentative and alternative communication professionals in the UK using a discrete choice experiment |
title_fullStr | Finding the best fit: examining the decision-making of augmentative and alternative communication professionals in the UK using a discrete choice experiment |
title_full_unstemmed | Finding the best fit: examining the decision-making of augmentative and alternative communication professionals in the UK using a discrete choice experiment |
title_short | Finding the best fit: examining the decision-making of augmentative and alternative communication professionals in the UK using a discrete choice experiment |
title_sort | finding the best fit: examining the decision-making of augmentative and alternative communication professionals in the uk using a discrete choice experiment |
topic | Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6924798/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31791963 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030274 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT webbedwardjd findingthebestfitexaminingthedecisionmakingofaugmentativeandalternativecommunicationprofessionalsintheukusingadiscretechoiceexperiment AT lynchyvonne findingthebestfitexaminingthedecisionmakingofaugmentativeandalternativecommunicationprofessionalsintheukusingadiscretechoiceexperiment AT meadsdavid findingthebestfitexaminingthedecisionmakingofaugmentativeandalternativecommunicationprofessionalsintheukusingadiscretechoiceexperiment AT judgesimon findingthebestfitexaminingthedecisionmakingofaugmentativeandalternativecommunicationprofessionalsintheukusingadiscretechoiceexperiment AT randallnicola findingthebestfitexaminingthedecisionmakingofaugmentativeandalternativecommunicationprofessionalsintheukusingadiscretechoiceexperiment AT goldbartjuliet findingthebestfitexaminingthedecisionmakingofaugmentativeandalternativecommunicationprofessionalsintheukusingadiscretechoiceexperiment AT meredithstuart findingthebestfitexaminingthedecisionmakingofaugmentativeandalternativecommunicationprofessionalsintheukusingadiscretechoiceexperiment AT moulamliz findingthebestfitexaminingthedecisionmakingofaugmentativeandalternativecommunicationprofessionalsintheukusingadiscretechoiceexperiment AT hessstephane findingthebestfitexaminingthedecisionmakingofaugmentativeandalternativecommunicationprofessionalsintheukusingadiscretechoiceexperiment AT murrayjanice findingthebestfitexaminingthedecisionmakingofaugmentativeandalternativecommunicationprofessionalsintheukusingadiscretechoiceexperiment |