Cargando…

Finding the best fit: examining the decision-making of augmentative and alternative communication professionals in the UK using a discrete choice experiment

OBJECTIVES: Many children with varied disabilities, for example, cerebral palsy, autism, can benefit from augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) systems. However, little is known about professionals’ decision-making when recommending symbol based AAC systems for children. This study examin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Webb, Edward J D, Lynch, Yvonne, Meads, David, Judge, Simon, Randall, Nicola, Goldbart, Juliet, Meredith, Stuart, Moulam, Liz, Hess, Stephane, Murray, Janice
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6924798/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31791963
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030274
_version_ 1783481791697387520
author Webb, Edward J D
Lynch, Yvonne
Meads, David
Judge, Simon
Randall, Nicola
Goldbart, Juliet
Meredith, Stuart
Moulam, Liz
Hess, Stephane
Murray, Janice
author_facet Webb, Edward J D
Lynch, Yvonne
Meads, David
Judge, Simon
Randall, Nicola
Goldbart, Juliet
Meredith, Stuart
Moulam, Liz
Hess, Stephane
Murray, Janice
author_sort Webb, Edward J D
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Many children with varied disabilities, for example, cerebral palsy, autism, can benefit from augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) systems. However, little is known about professionals’ decision-making when recommending symbol based AAC systems for children. This study examines AAC professionals’ preferences for attributes of AAC systems and how they interact with child characteristics. DESIGN: AAC professionals answered a discrete choice experiment survey with AAC system and child-related attributes, where participants chose an AAC system for a child vignette. SETTING: The survey was administered online in the UK. PARTICIPANTS: 155 UK-based AAC professionals were recruited between 20 October 2017 and 4 March 2018. OUTCOMES: The study outcomes were the preferences of AAC professionals’ as quantified using a mixed logit model, with model selection performed using a step-wise procedure and the Bayesian Information Criterion. RESULTS: Significant differences were observed in preferences for AAC system attributes, and large interactions were seen between child attributes included in the child vignettes, for example, participants made more ambitious choices for children who were motivated to communicate using AAC, and predicted to progress in skills and abilities. These characteristics were perceived as relatively more important than language ability and previous AAC experience. CONCLUSIONS: AAC professionals make trade-offs between attributes of AAC systems, and these trade-offs change depending on the characteristics of the child for whom the system is being provided.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6924798
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69247982020-01-02 Finding the best fit: examining the decision-making of augmentative and alternative communication professionals in the UK using a discrete choice experiment Webb, Edward J D Lynch, Yvonne Meads, David Judge, Simon Randall, Nicola Goldbart, Juliet Meredith, Stuart Moulam, Liz Hess, Stephane Murray, Janice BMJ Open Communication OBJECTIVES: Many children with varied disabilities, for example, cerebral palsy, autism, can benefit from augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) systems. However, little is known about professionals’ decision-making when recommending symbol based AAC systems for children. This study examines AAC professionals’ preferences for attributes of AAC systems and how they interact with child characteristics. DESIGN: AAC professionals answered a discrete choice experiment survey with AAC system and child-related attributes, where participants chose an AAC system for a child vignette. SETTING: The survey was administered online in the UK. PARTICIPANTS: 155 UK-based AAC professionals were recruited between 20 October 2017 and 4 March 2018. OUTCOMES: The study outcomes were the preferences of AAC professionals’ as quantified using a mixed logit model, with model selection performed using a step-wise procedure and the Bayesian Information Criterion. RESULTS: Significant differences were observed in preferences for AAC system attributes, and large interactions were seen between child attributes included in the child vignettes, for example, participants made more ambitious choices for children who were motivated to communicate using AAC, and predicted to progress in skills and abilities. These characteristics were perceived as relatively more important than language ability and previous AAC experience. CONCLUSIONS: AAC professionals make trade-offs between attributes of AAC systems, and these trade-offs change depending on the characteristics of the child for whom the system is being provided. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6924798/ /pubmed/31791963 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030274 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Communication
Webb, Edward J D
Lynch, Yvonne
Meads, David
Judge, Simon
Randall, Nicola
Goldbart, Juliet
Meredith, Stuart
Moulam, Liz
Hess, Stephane
Murray, Janice
Finding the best fit: examining the decision-making of augmentative and alternative communication professionals in the UK using a discrete choice experiment
title Finding the best fit: examining the decision-making of augmentative and alternative communication professionals in the UK using a discrete choice experiment
title_full Finding the best fit: examining the decision-making of augmentative and alternative communication professionals in the UK using a discrete choice experiment
title_fullStr Finding the best fit: examining the decision-making of augmentative and alternative communication professionals in the UK using a discrete choice experiment
title_full_unstemmed Finding the best fit: examining the decision-making of augmentative and alternative communication professionals in the UK using a discrete choice experiment
title_short Finding the best fit: examining the decision-making of augmentative and alternative communication professionals in the UK using a discrete choice experiment
title_sort finding the best fit: examining the decision-making of augmentative and alternative communication professionals in the uk using a discrete choice experiment
topic Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6924798/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31791963
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030274
work_keys_str_mv AT webbedwardjd findingthebestfitexaminingthedecisionmakingofaugmentativeandalternativecommunicationprofessionalsintheukusingadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT lynchyvonne findingthebestfitexaminingthedecisionmakingofaugmentativeandalternativecommunicationprofessionalsintheukusingadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT meadsdavid findingthebestfitexaminingthedecisionmakingofaugmentativeandalternativecommunicationprofessionalsintheukusingadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT judgesimon findingthebestfitexaminingthedecisionmakingofaugmentativeandalternativecommunicationprofessionalsintheukusingadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT randallnicola findingthebestfitexaminingthedecisionmakingofaugmentativeandalternativecommunicationprofessionalsintheukusingadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT goldbartjuliet findingthebestfitexaminingthedecisionmakingofaugmentativeandalternativecommunicationprofessionalsintheukusingadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT meredithstuart findingthebestfitexaminingthedecisionmakingofaugmentativeandalternativecommunicationprofessionalsintheukusingadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT moulamliz findingthebestfitexaminingthedecisionmakingofaugmentativeandalternativecommunicationprofessionalsintheukusingadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT hessstephane findingthebestfitexaminingthedecisionmakingofaugmentativeandalternativecommunicationprofessionalsintheukusingadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT murrayjanice findingthebestfitexaminingthedecisionmakingofaugmentativeandalternativecommunicationprofessionalsintheukusingadiscretechoiceexperiment