Cargando…

Evidence-based occupational health and safety interventions: a comprehensive overview of reviews

OBJECTIVES: Occupational injuries and diseases are a huge public health problem and cause extensive suffering and loss of productivity. Nevertheless, many occupational health and safety (OHS) guidelines are still not based on the best available evidence. In the last decade, numerous systematic revie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Teufer, Birgit, Ebenberger, Agnes, Affengruber, Lisa, Kien, Christina, Klerings, Irma, Szelag, Monika, Grillich, Ludwig, Griebler, Ursula
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6924871/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31831544
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032528
_version_ 1783481808845799424
author Teufer, Birgit
Ebenberger, Agnes
Affengruber, Lisa
Kien, Christina
Klerings, Irma
Szelag, Monika
Grillich, Ludwig
Griebler, Ursula
author_facet Teufer, Birgit
Ebenberger, Agnes
Affengruber, Lisa
Kien, Christina
Klerings, Irma
Szelag, Monika
Grillich, Ludwig
Griebler, Ursula
author_sort Teufer, Birgit
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Occupational injuries and diseases are a huge public health problem and cause extensive suffering and loss of productivity. Nevertheless, many occupational health and safety (OHS) guidelines are still not based on the best available evidence. In the last decade, numerous systematic reviews on behavioural, relational and mixed interventions to reduce occupational injuries and diseases have been carried out, but a comprehensive synopsis is yet missing. The aim of this overview of reviews is to provide a comprehensive basis to inform evidence-based decision-making about interventions in the field of OHS. METHODS: We conducted an overview of reviews. We searched MEDLINE (Ovid), the Cochrane Library (Wiley), epistemonikos.org and Scopus (Elsevier) for relevant systematic reviews published between January 2008 and June 2018. Two authors independently screened abstracts and full-text publications and determined the risk of bias of the included systematic reviews with the ROBIS (Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews) tool. RESULTS: We screened 2287 abstracts and 200 full-texts for eligibility. Finally, we included 25 systematic reviews with a low risk of bias for data synthesis and analysis. We identified systematic reviews on the prevention of occupational injuries, musculoskeletal, skin and lung diseases, occupational hearing impairment and interventions without specific target diseases. Several interventions led to consistently positive results on individual diseases; other interventions did not show any effects, or the studies are contradictory. We provide detailed results on all included interventions. DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive overview of behavioural, relational and mixed interventions and their effectiveness in preventing occupational injuries and diseases. It provides policymakers with an important basis for making evidence-based decisions on interventions in this field. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018100341
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6924871
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69248712020-01-03 Evidence-based occupational health and safety interventions: a comprehensive overview of reviews Teufer, Birgit Ebenberger, Agnes Affengruber, Lisa Kien, Christina Klerings, Irma Szelag, Monika Grillich, Ludwig Griebler, Ursula BMJ Open Occupational and Environmental Medicine OBJECTIVES: Occupational injuries and diseases are a huge public health problem and cause extensive suffering and loss of productivity. Nevertheless, many occupational health and safety (OHS) guidelines are still not based on the best available evidence. In the last decade, numerous systematic reviews on behavioural, relational and mixed interventions to reduce occupational injuries and diseases have been carried out, but a comprehensive synopsis is yet missing. The aim of this overview of reviews is to provide a comprehensive basis to inform evidence-based decision-making about interventions in the field of OHS. METHODS: We conducted an overview of reviews. We searched MEDLINE (Ovid), the Cochrane Library (Wiley), epistemonikos.org and Scopus (Elsevier) for relevant systematic reviews published between January 2008 and June 2018. Two authors independently screened abstracts and full-text publications and determined the risk of bias of the included systematic reviews with the ROBIS (Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews) tool. RESULTS: We screened 2287 abstracts and 200 full-texts for eligibility. Finally, we included 25 systematic reviews with a low risk of bias for data synthesis and analysis. We identified systematic reviews on the prevention of occupational injuries, musculoskeletal, skin and lung diseases, occupational hearing impairment and interventions without specific target diseases. Several interventions led to consistently positive results on individual diseases; other interventions did not show any effects, or the studies are contradictory. We provide detailed results on all included interventions. DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive overview of behavioural, relational and mixed interventions and their effectiveness in preventing occupational injuries and diseases. It provides policymakers with an important basis for making evidence-based decisions on interventions in this field. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018100341 BMJ Publishing Group 2019-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6924871/ /pubmed/31831544 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032528 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Teufer, Birgit
Ebenberger, Agnes
Affengruber, Lisa
Kien, Christina
Klerings, Irma
Szelag, Monika
Grillich, Ludwig
Griebler, Ursula
Evidence-based occupational health and safety interventions: a comprehensive overview of reviews
title Evidence-based occupational health and safety interventions: a comprehensive overview of reviews
title_full Evidence-based occupational health and safety interventions: a comprehensive overview of reviews
title_fullStr Evidence-based occupational health and safety interventions: a comprehensive overview of reviews
title_full_unstemmed Evidence-based occupational health and safety interventions: a comprehensive overview of reviews
title_short Evidence-based occupational health and safety interventions: a comprehensive overview of reviews
title_sort evidence-based occupational health and safety interventions: a comprehensive overview of reviews
topic Occupational and Environmental Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6924871/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31831544
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032528
work_keys_str_mv AT teuferbirgit evidencebasedoccupationalhealthandsafetyinterventionsacomprehensiveoverviewofreviews
AT ebenbergeragnes evidencebasedoccupationalhealthandsafetyinterventionsacomprehensiveoverviewofreviews
AT affengruberlisa evidencebasedoccupationalhealthandsafetyinterventionsacomprehensiveoverviewofreviews
AT kienchristina evidencebasedoccupationalhealthandsafetyinterventionsacomprehensiveoverviewofreviews
AT kleringsirma evidencebasedoccupationalhealthandsafetyinterventionsacomprehensiveoverviewofreviews
AT szelagmonika evidencebasedoccupationalhealthandsafetyinterventionsacomprehensiveoverviewofreviews
AT grillichludwig evidencebasedoccupationalhealthandsafetyinterventionsacomprehensiveoverviewofreviews
AT grieblerursula evidencebasedoccupationalhealthandsafetyinterventionsacomprehensiveoverviewofreviews