Cargando…
Evidence-based occupational health and safety interventions: a comprehensive overview of reviews
OBJECTIVES: Occupational injuries and diseases are a huge public health problem and cause extensive suffering and loss of productivity. Nevertheless, many occupational health and safety (OHS) guidelines are still not based on the best available evidence. In the last decade, numerous systematic revie...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6924871/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31831544 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032528 |
_version_ | 1783481808845799424 |
---|---|
author | Teufer, Birgit Ebenberger, Agnes Affengruber, Lisa Kien, Christina Klerings, Irma Szelag, Monika Grillich, Ludwig Griebler, Ursula |
author_facet | Teufer, Birgit Ebenberger, Agnes Affengruber, Lisa Kien, Christina Klerings, Irma Szelag, Monika Grillich, Ludwig Griebler, Ursula |
author_sort | Teufer, Birgit |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Occupational injuries and diseases are a huge public health problem and cause extensive suffering and loss of productivity. Nevertheless, many occupational health and safety (OHS) guidelines are still not based on the best available evidence. In the last decade, numerous systematic reviews on behavioural, relational and mixed interventions to reduce occupational injuries and diseases have been carried out, but a comprehensive synopsis is yet missing. The aim of this overview of reviews is to provide a comprehensive basis to inform evidence-based decision-making about interventions in the field of OHS. METHODS: We conducted an overview of reviews. We searched MEDLINE (Ovid), the Cochrane Library (Wiley), epistemonikos.org and Scopus (Elsevier) for relevant systematic reviews published between January 2008 and June 2018. Two authors independently screened abstracts and full-text publications and determined the risk of bias of the included systematic reviews with the ROBIS (Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews) tool. RESULTS: We screened 2287 abstracts and 200 full-texts for eligibility. Finally, we included 25 systematic reviews with a low risk of bias for data synthesis and analysis. We identified systematic reviews on the prevention of occupational injuries, musculoskeletal, skin and lung diseases, occupational hearing impairment and interventions without specific target diseases. Several interventions led to consistently positive results on individual diseases; other interventions did not show any effects, or the studies are contradictory. We provide detailed results on all included interventions. DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive overview of behavioural, relational and mixed interventions and their effectiveness in preventing occupational injuries and diseases. It provides policymakers with an important basis for making evidence-based decisions on interventions in this field. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018100341 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6924871 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69248712020-01-03 Evidence-based occupational health and safety interventions: a comprehensive overview of reviews Teufer, Birgit Ebenberger, Agnes Affengruber, Lisa Kien, Christina Klerings, Irma Szelag, Monika Grillich, Ludwig Griebler, Ursula BMJ Open Occupational and Environmental Medicine OBJECTIVES: Occupational injuries and diseases are a huge public health problem and cause extensive suffering and loss of productivity. Nevertheless, many occupational health and safety (OHS) guidelines are still not based on the best available evidence. In the last decade, numerous systematic reviews on behavioural, relational and mixed interventions to reduce occupational injuries and diseases have been carried out, but a comprehensive synopsis is yet missing. The aim of this overview of reviews is to provide a comprehensive basis to inform evidence-based decision-making about interventions in the field of OHS. METHODS: We conducted an overview of reviews. We searched MEDLINE (Ovid), the Cochrane Library (Wiley), epistemonikos.org and Scopus (Elsevier) for relevant systematic reviews published between January 2008 and June 2018. Two authors independently screened abstracts and full-text publications and determined the risk of bias of the included systematic reviews with the ROBIS (Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews) tool. RESULTS: We screened 2287 abstracts and 200 full-texts for eligibility. Finally, we included 25 systematic reviews with a low risk of bias for data synthesis and analysis. We identified systematic reviews on the prevention of occupational injuries, musculoskeletal, skin and lung diseases, occupational hearing impairment and interventions without specific target diseases. Several interventions led to consistently positive results on individual diseases; other interventions did not show any effects, or the studies are contradictory. We provide detailed results on all included interventions. DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive overview of behavioural, relational and mixed interventions and their effectiveness in preventing occupational injuries and diseases. It provides policymakers with an important basis for making evidence-based decisions on interventions in this field. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018100341 BMJ Publishing Group 2019-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6924871/ /pubmed/31831544 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032528 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Occupational and Environmental Medicine Teufer, Birgit Ebenberger, Agnes Affengruber, Lisa Kien, Christina Klerings, Irma Szelag, Monika Grillich, Ludwig Griebler, Ursula Evidence-based occupational health and safety interventions: a comprehensive overview of reviews |
title | Evidence-based occupational health and safety interventions: a comprehensive overview of reviews |
title_full | Evidence-based occupational health and safety interventions: a comprehensive overview of reviews |
title_fullStr | Evidence-based occupational health and safety interventions: a comprehensive overview of reviews |
title_full_unstemmed | Evidence-based occupational health and safety interventions: a comprehensive overview of reviews |
title_short | Evidence-based occupational health and safety interventions: a comprehensive overview of reviews |
title_sort | evidence-based occupational health and safety interventions: a comprehensive overview of reviews |
topic | Occupational and Environmental Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6924871/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31831544 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032528 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT teuferbirgit evidencebasedoccupationalhealthandsafetyinterventionsacomprehensiveoverviewofreviews AT ebenbergeragnes evidencebasedoccupationalhealthandsafetyinterventionsacomprehensiveoverviewofreviews AT affengruberlisa evidencebasedoccupationalhealthandsafetyinterventionsacomprehensiveoverviewofreviews AT kienchristina evidencebasedoccupationalhealthandsafetyinterventionsacomprehensiveoverviewofreviews AT kleringsirma evidencebasedoccupationalhealthandsafetyinterventionsacomprehensiveoverviewofreviews AT szelagmonika evidencebasedoccupationalhealthandsafetyinterventionsacomprehensiveoverviewofreviews AT grillichludwig evidencebasedoccupationalhealthandsafetyinterventionsacomprehensiveoverviewofreviews AT grieblerursula evidencebasedoccupationalhealthandsafetyinterventionsacomprehensiveoverviewofreviews |