Cargando…

Scoping review study to identify how communities in the USA, Australia, New Zealand and Canada use quality improvement (QI) approaches to address community health and well-being

INTRODUCTION: Both US and global communities lag on key health indicators. There has been limited progress in building capacity to improve health beyond the healthcare field. Yet, communities also need to engage in health improvement initiatives. A substantial body of literature describes standards...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carr, Tara, Turner, Mallory Wolfe, Ramaswamy, Rohit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6924873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31831551
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034302
_version_ 1783481809354358784
author Carr, Tara
Turner, Mallory Wolfe
Ramaswamy, Rohit
author_facet Carr, Tara
Turner, Mallory Wolfe
Ramaswamy, Rohit
author_sort Carr, Tara
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Both US and global communities lag on key health indicators. There has been limited progress in building capacity to improve health beyond the healthcare field. Yet, communities also need to engage in health improvement initiatives. A substantial body of literature describes standards and core components for quality improvement (QI) approaches in clinical settings. This study aims to determine how communities in the USA, Australia, New Zealand and Canada use QI approaches for health and well-being improvement and how such approaches compare to those in clinical settings. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We developed a study protocol based on scoping review framework by Arksey and O’Malley, methodological advancements for scoping studies (Levac et al) and other published protocols. We developed research questions in an iterative process and used the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes strategy to determine eligibility criteria. Electronic databases deemed appropriate (Web of Science, Scopus, and Proquest Health Management) will be searched for studies that meet inclusion criteria. References of included studies will be included when relevant. Two reviewers will independently screen all abstracts and full-text studies for inclusion. A third reviewer will adjudicate disagreements that arise. An instrument will be developed to extract data from included studies. Quantitative and qualitative results will be reported. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: We developed this protocol to systematically conduct a scoping review of how US communities use QI approaches to address community health and well-being. Results will benefit multiple stakeholders by informing how to better support, design and evaluate community well-being improvement interventions. Results will be distributed through peer-reviewed journals, conferences, presentations and a public health graduate course.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6924873
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69248732020-01-03 Scoping review study to identify how communities in the USA, Australia, New Zealand and Canada use quality improvement (QI) approaches to address community health and well-being Carr, Tara Turner, Mallory Wolfe Ramaswamy, Rohit BMJ Open Public Health INTRODUCTION: Both US and global communities lag on key health indicators. There has been limited progress in building capacity to improve health beyond the healthcare field. Yet, communities also need to engage in health improvement initiatives. A substantial body of literature describes standards and core components for quality improvement (QI) approaches in clinical settings. This study aims to determine how communities in the USA, Australia, New Zealand and Canada use QI approaches for health and well-being improvement and how such approaches compare to those in clinical settings. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We developed a study protocol based on scoping review framework by Arksey and O’Malley, methodological advancements for scoping studies (Levac et al) and other published protocols. We developed research questions in an iterative process and used the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes strategy to determine eligibility criteria. Electronic databases deemed appropriate (Web of Science, Scopus, and Proquest Health Management) will be searched for studies that meet inclusion criteria. References of included studies will be included when relevant. Two reviewers will independently screen all abstracts and full-text studies for inclusion. A third reviewer will adjudicate disagreements that arise. An instrument will be developed to extract data from included studies. Quantitative and qualitative results will be reported. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: We developed this protocol to systematically conduct a scoping review of how US communities use QI approaches to address community health and well-being. Results will benefit multiple stakeholders by informing how to better support, design and evaluate community well-being improvement interventions. Results will be distributed through peer-reviewed journals, conferences, presentations and a public health graduate course. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6924873/ /pubmed/31831551 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034302 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Public Health
Carr, Tara
Turner, Mallory Wolfe
Ramaswamy, Rohit
Scoping review study to identify how communities in the USA, Australia, New Zealand and Canada use quality improvement (QI) approaches to address community health and well-being
title Scoping review study to identify how communities in the USA, Australia, New Zealand and Canada use quality improvement (QI) approaches to address community health and well-being
title_full Scoping review study to identify how communities in the USA, Australia, New Zealand and Canada use quality improvement (QI) approaches to address community health and well-being
title_fullStr Scoping review study to identify how communities in the USA, Australia, New Zealand and Canada use quality improvement (QI) approaches to address community health and well-being
title_full_unstemmed Scoping review study to identify how communities in the USA, Australia, New Zealand and Canada use quality improvement (QI) approaches to address community health and well-being
title_short Scoping review study to identify how communities in the USA, Australia, New Zealand and Canada use quality improvement (QI) approaches to address community health and well-being
title_sort scoping review study to identify how communities in the usa, australia, new zealand and canada use quality improvement (qi) approaches to address community health and well-being
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6924873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31831551
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034302
work_keys_str_mv AT carrtara scopingreviewstudytoidentifyhowcommunitiesintheusaaustralianewzealandandcanadausequalityimprovementqiapproachestoaddresscommunityhealthandwellbeing
AT turnermallorywolfe scopingreviewstudytoidentifyhowcommunitiesintheusaaustralianewzealandandcanadausequalityimprovementqiapproachestoaddresscommunityhealthandwellbeing
AT ramaswamyrohit scopingreviewstudytoidentifyhowcommunitiesintheusaaustralianewzealandandcanadausequalityimprovementqiapproachestoaddresscommunityhealthandwellbeing