Cargando…

North American cost analysis of brand name versus generic drugs for the treatment of glaucoma

BACKGROUND: According to the World Health Organization, glaucoma is a leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide. By 2020, 80 million people will be affected by glaucoma in the world, which represents a significant financial burden to society. Glaucoma medications alone make up 38–52% of the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Malvankar-Mehta, Monali S, Feng, Lucy, Hutnik, Cindy ML
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6924989/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31908505
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S156558
_version_ 1783481829946294272
author Malvankar-Mehta, Monali S
Feng, Lucy
Hutnik, Cindy ML
author_facet Malvankar-Mehta, Monali S
Feng, Lucy
Hutnik, Cindy ML
author_sort Malvankar-Mehta, Monali S
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: According to the World Health Organization, glaucoma is a leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide. By 2020, 80 million people will be affected by glaucoma in the world, which represents a significant financial burden to society. Glaucoma medications alone make up 38–52% of the total direct cost. The purpose of this research is to conduct a cost-minimization analysis to evaluate brand-name medications versus generic medications for treating glaucoma patients. METHODS: The per-bottle cost (in Canadian dollars) of brand-name drugs for glaucoma was obtained from the wholesaler, McKesson Canada, and, for generic drugs, from the Ontario Drug Benefit (ODB) Formulary. Further, a wastage adjustment fee, a pharmacy mark-up, and an ODB dispensing fee ($CAD) was added to the cost of both brand and generic. Previously published frequencies of medication prescription were utilized to calculate the average annual cost for each class of brand and generic. For each medication class and for mono-, bi-, and tri-drug therapy, the cost differential between brands and generics over a six-year period was computed and analyzed from third-party payer perspective. RESULTS: In descending order, the average annual government-funded health care system costs were: combination drugs such as Cosopt(®) ($748.23) were the most expensive, followed by prostaglandin analogs ($246.36), carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (CAIs) ($45.04), α-agonist ($30.34), β-blockers ($29.29), and cholinergic agonists ($16.51). Brand-name mono-drugs are 34% more expensive compared to generics. Brand-generic percentage cost differential for various medication classes over a six-year period was the highest for prostaglandin analogous (44%), followed by β-blockers (35%), α-agonist (31%), cholinergic agonists (22%), combination drugs (10%), and CAIs (1%). CONCLUSION: Brand-name drugs are relatively more expensive than their generic counterparts, with variable cost differentials depending on drug class.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6924989
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69249892020-01-06 North American cost analysis of brand name versus generic drugs for the treatment of glaucoma Malvankar-Mehta, Monali S Feng, Lucy Hutnik, Cindy ML Clinicoecon Outcomes Res Original Research BACKGROUND: According to the World Health Organization, glaucoma is a leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide. By 2020, 80 million people will be affected by glaucoma in the world, which represents a significant financial burden to society. Glaucoma medications alone make up 38–52% of the total direct cost. The purpose of this research is to conduct a cost-minimization analysis to evaluate brand-name medications versus generic medications for treating glaucoma patients. METHODS: The per-bottle cost (in Canadian dollars) of brand-name drugs for glaucoma was obtained from the wholesaler, McKesson Canada, and, for generic drugs, from the Ontario Drug Benefit (ODB) Formulary. Further, a wastage adjustment fee, a pharmacy mark-up, and an ODB dispensing fee ($CAD) was added to the cost of both brand and generic. Previously published frequencies of medication prescription were utilized to calculate the average annual cost for each class of brand and generic. For each medication class and for mono-, bi-, and tri-drug therapy, the cost differential between brands and generics over a six-year period was computed and analyzed from third-party payer perspective. RESULTS: In descending order, the average annual government-funded health care system costs were: combination drugs such as Cosopt(®) ($748.23) were the most expensive, followed by prostaglandin analogs ($246.36), carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (CAIs) ($45.04), α-agonist ($30.34), β-blockers ($29.29), and cholinergic agonists ($16.51). Brand-name mono-drugs are 34% more expensive compared to generics. Brand-generic percentage cost differential for various medication classes over a six-year period was the highest for prostaglandin analogous (44%), followed by β-blockers (35%), α-agonist (31%), cholinergic agonists (22%), combination drugs (10%), and CAIs (1%). CONCLUSION: Brand-name drugs are relatively more expensive than their generic counterparts, with variable cost differentials depending on drug class. Dove 2019-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6924989/ /pubmed/31908505 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S156558 Text en © 2019 Malvankar-Mehta et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Malvankar-Mehta, Monali S
Feng, Lucy
Hutnik, Cindy ML
North American cost analysis of brand name versus generic drugs for the treatment of glaucoma
title North American cost analysis of brand name versus generic drugs for the treatment of glaucoma
title_full North American cost analysis of brand name versus generic drugs for the treatment of glaucoma
title_fullStr North American cost analysis of brand name versus generic drugs for the treatment of glaucoma
title_full_unstemmed North American cost analysis of brand name versus generic drugs for the treatment of glaucoma
title_short North American cost analysis of brand name versus generic drugs for the treatment of glaucoma
title_sort north american cost analysis of brand name versus generic drugs for the treatment of glaucoma
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6924989/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31908505
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S156558
work_keys_str_mv AT malvankarmehtamonalis northamericancostanalysisofbrandnameversusgenericdrugsforthetreatmentofglaucoma
AT fenglucy northamericancostanalysisofbrandnameversusgenericdrugsforthetreatmentofglaucoma
AT hutnikcindyml northamericancostanalysisofbrandnameversusgenericdrugsforthetreatmentofglaucoma