Cargando…

Evaluation of effects of a novel probiotic feed supplement on the quality of broiler meat

BACKGROUND AND AIM: A local microorganism-based probiotic has been developed as an alternative to using antibiotic growth promoter and its effect on broiler meat quality has been studied, when supplemented with poultry feed at different concentrations. This study aimed to understand the effect of lo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Suryadi, Ujang, Nugraheni, Yudhi Ratna, Prasetyo, Anang Febri, Awaludin, Aan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Veterinary World 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6925057/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32009756
http://dx.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2019.1775-1778
_version_ 1783481839041642496
author Suryadi, Ujang
Nugraheni, Yudhi Ratna
Prasetyo, Anang Febri
Awaludin, Aan
author_facet Suryadi, Ujang
Nugraheni, Yudhi Ratna
Prasetyo, Anang Febri
Awaludin, Aan
author_sort Suryadi, Ujang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIM: A local microorganism-based probiotic has been developed as an alternative to using antibiotic growth promoter and its effect on broiler meat quality has been studied, when supplemented with poultry feed at different concentrations. This study aimed to understand the effect of local microorganism-based probiotic sourced from cattle rumen and chicken intestine and added as feed supplement at different concentrations on broiler meat quality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The local microorganism-based probiotic made from cattle rumen and chicken intestine contained Lactobacillus spp., Bifidobacterium spp., Streptococcus spp., and Bacillus spp. The experiments followed a completely randomized design. Treatments in the study were: P0, i.e., control (without probiotic), P1 (probiotic administered at 5 ml/kg feed), P2 (probiotic administered at 10 ml/kg feed), and P3 (probiotic administered at 15 ml/kg feed). Each treatment was repeated 5 times. Parameters examined in this study were pH, meat tenderness, fat content, and meat protein content. RESULTS: Based on a total of 200 chickens, the percentage of meat protein content in treatments P1, P2, and P3 showed an increase of 19.34%, 19.42%, and 19.64%, respectively, when compared with P0 that showed a protein content increase of 19.14%. The fat content of meat for P1, P2, and P3 was 21.54%, 21.46%, and 21.30%, respectively, which was less than the value for P0 (21.69%). The treatments did not significantly affect pH or meat tenderness when compared with the control. The usage of this novel probiotic as a feed supplement resulted in an increase in meat protein content and a decrease in fat content. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that using the local microorganism-based probiotic sourced from cattle rumen and chicken intestine to supplement poultry feed did not have a significantly different effect (p>0.05) on meat pH; however, it had a significantly different (p<0.05) on protein and fat content of broiler meat.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6925057
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Veterinary World
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69250572020-01-31 Evaluation of effects of a novel probiotic feed supplement on the quality of broiler meat Suryadi, Ujang Nugraheni, Yudhi Ratna Prasetyo, Anang Febri Awaludin, Aan Vet World Research Article BACKGROUND AND AIM: A local microorganism-based probiotic has been developed as an alternative to using antibiotic growth promoter and its effect on broiler meat quality has been studied, when supplemented with poultry feed at different concentrations. This study aimed to understand the effect of local microorganism-based probiotic sourced from cattle rumen and chicken intestine and added as feed supplement at different concentrations on broiler meat quality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The local microorganism-based probiotic made from cattle rumen and chicken intestine contained Lactobacillus spp., Bifidobacterium spp., Streptococcus spp., and Bacillus spp. The experiments followed a completely randomized design. Treatments in the study were: P0, i.e., control (without probiotic), P1 (probiotic administered at 5 ml/kg feed), P2 (probiotic administered at 10 ml/kg feed), and P3 (probiotic administered at 15 ml/kg feed). Each treatment was repeated 5 times. Parameters examined in this study were pH, meat tenderness, fat content, and meat protein content. RESULTS: Based on a total of 200 chickens, the percentage of meat protein content in treatments P1, P2, and P3 showed an increase of 19.34%, 19.42%, and 19.64%, respectively, when compared with P0 that showed a protein content increase of 19.14%. The fat content of meat for P1, P2, and P3 was 21.54%, 21.46%, and 21.30%, respectively, which was less than the value for P0 (21.69%). The treatments did not significantly affect pH or meat tenderness when compared with the control. The usage of this novel probiotic as a feed supplement resulted in an increase in meat protein content and a decrease in fat content. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that using the local microorganism-based probiotic sourced from cattle rumen and chicken intestine to supplement poultry feed did not have a significantly different effect (p>0.05) on meat pH; however, it had a significantly different (p<0.05) on protein and fat content of broiler meat. Veterinary World 2019-11 2019-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6925057/ /pubmed/32009756 http://dx.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2019.1775-1778 Text en Copyright: © Suryadi, et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Suryadi, Ujang
Nugraheni, Yudhi Ratna
Prasetyo, Anang Febri
Awaludin, Aan
Evaluation of effects of a novel probiotic feed supplement on the quality of broiler meat
title Evaluation of effects of a novel probiotic feed supplement on the quality of broiler meat
title_full Evaluation of effects of a novel probiotic feed supplement on the quality of broiler meat
title_fullStr Evaluation of effects of a novel probiotic feed supplement on the quality of broiler meat
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of effects of a novel probiotic feed supplement on the quality of broiler meat
title_short Evaluation of effects of a novel probiotic feed supplement on the quality of broiler meat
title_sort evaluation of effects of a novel probiotic feed supplement on the quality of broiler meat
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6925057/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32009756
http://dx.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2019.1775-1778
work_keys_str_mv AT suryadiujang evaluationofeffectsofanovelprobioticfeedsupplementonthequalityofbroilermeat
AT nugraheniyudhiratna evaluationofeffectsofanovelprobioticfeedsupplementonthequalityofbroilermeat
AT prasetyoanangfebri evaluationofeffectsofanovelprobioticfeedsupplementonthequalityofbroilermeat
AT awaludinaan evaluationofeffectsofanovelprobioticfeedsupplementonthequalityofbroilermeat