Cargando…

Prognostic Impact of BRAF and KRAS Mutation in Patients with Colorectal and Appendiceal Peritoneal Metastases Scheduled for CRS and HIPEC

BACKGROUND: KRAS and BRAF mutations are prognostic and predictive tools in metastatic colorectal cancer, but little is known about their prognostic value in patients scheduled for cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Therefore, we analyzed the prognostic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Graf, Wilhelm, Cashin, Peter H., Ghanipour, Lana, Enblad, Malin, Botling, Johan, Terman, Alexei, Birgisson, Helgi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6925063/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31571052
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07452-2
_version_ 1783481840206610432
author Graf, Wilhelm
Cashin, Peter H.
Ghanipour, Lana
Enblad, Malin
Botling, Johan
Terman, Alexei
Birgisson, Helgi
author_facet Graf, Wilhelm
Cashin, Peter H.
Ghanipour, Lana
Enblad, Malin
Botling, Johan
Terman, Alexei
Birgisson, Helgi
author_sort Graf, Wilhelm
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: KRAS and BRAF mutations are prognostic and predictive tools in metastatic colorectal cancer, but little is known about their prognostic value in patients scheduled for cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Therefore, we analyzed the prognostic impact of KRAS and BRAF mutations in patients with peritoneal metastases scheduled for CRS and HIPEC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a consecutive series of 399 patients scheduled for CRS and HIPEC between 2009 and 2017, 111 subjects with peritoneal metastases from primaries of the appendix, colon, or rectum were analyzed for KRAS mutation and 92 for BRAF mutation. RESULTS: Mutation in KRAS was present in 51/111 (46%), and mutated BRAF was found in 10/92 (11%). There was no difference in overall survival between KRAS mutation tumors and KRAS wild type, whereas BRAF mutation was associated with short survival. No subject with BRAF mutation survived 2 years. On multivariate analysis, completeness of cytoreduction score (CCS, p = 0.000001), presence of signet cell differentiation (p = 0.000001), and BRAF mutation (p = 0.0021) were linked with poor prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: BRAF mutation is a marker of poor prognosis in patients with appendiceal and colorectal peritoneal metastases scheduled for CRS and HIPEC, whereas survival outcome in subjects with mutated KRAS does not differ from wild-type KRAS. This finding suggests that those with BRAF mutation should be considered for alternative treatment options.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6925063
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69250632020-01-03 Prognostic Impact of BRAF and KRAS Mutation in Patients with Colorectal and Appendiceal Peritoneal Metastases Scheduled for CRS and HIPEC Graf, Wilhelm Cashin, Peter H. Ghanipour, Lana Enblad, Malin Botling, Johan Terman, Alexei Birgisson, Helgi Ann Surg Oncol Peritoneal Surface Malignancy BACKGROUND: KRAS and BRAF mutations are prognostic and predictive tools in metastatic colorectal cancer, but little is known about their prognostic value in patients scheduled for cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Therefore, we analyzed the prognostic impact of KRAS and BRAF mutations in patients with peritoneal metastases scheduled for CRS and HIPEC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a consecutive series of 399 patients scheduled for CRS and HIPEC between 2009 and 2017, 111 subjects with peritoneal metastases from primaries of the appendix, colon, or rectum were analyzed for KRAS mutation and 92 for BRAF mutation. RESULTS: Mutation in KRAS was present in 51/111 (46%), and mutated BRAF was found in 10/92 (11%). There was no difference in overall survival between KRAS mutation tumors and KRAS wild type, whereas BRAF mutation was associated with short survival. No subject with BRAF mutation survived 2 years. On multivariate analysis, completeness of cytoreduction score (CCS, p = 0.000001), presence of signet cell differentiation (p = 0.000001), and BRAF mutation (p = 0.0021) were linked with poor prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: BRAF mutation is a marker of poor prognosis in patients with appendiceal and colorectal peritoneal metastases scheduled for CRS and HIPEC, whereas survival outcome in subjects with mutated KRAS does not differ from wild-type KRAS. This finding suggests that those with BRAF mutation should be considered for alternative treatment options. Springer International Publishing 2019-09-30 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC6925063/ /pubmed/31571052 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07452-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Peritoneal Surface Malignancy
Graf, Wilhelm
Cashin, Peter H.
Ghanipour, Lana
Enblad, Malin
Botling, Johan
Terman, Alexei
Birgisson, Helgi
Prognostic Impact of BRAF and KRAS Mutation in Patients with Colorectal and Appendiceal Peritoneal Metastases Scheduled for CRS and HIPEC
title Prognostic Impact of BRAF and KRAS Mutation in Patients with Colorectal and Appendiceal Peritoneal Metastases Scheduled for CRS and HIPEC
title_full Prognostic Impact of BRAF and KRAS Mutation in Patients with Colorectal and Appendiceal Peritoneal Metastases Scheduled for CRS and HIPEC
title_fullStr Prognostic Impact of BRAF and KRAS Mutation in Patients with Colorectal and Appendiceal Peritoneal Metastases Scheduled for CRS and HIPEC
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic Impact of BRAF and KRAS Mutation in Patients with Colorectal and Appendiceal Peritoneal Metastases Scheduled for CRS and HIPEC
title_short Prognostic Impact of BRAF and KRAS Mutation in Patients with Colorectal and Appendiceal Peritoneal Metastases Scheduled for CRS and HIPEC
title_sort prognostic impact of braf and kras mutation in patients with colorectal and appendiceal peritoneal metastases scheduled for crs and hipec
topic Peritoneal Surface Malignancy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6925063/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31571052
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07452-2
work_keys_str_mv AT grafwilhelm prognosticimpactofbrafandkrasmutationinpatientswithcolorectalandappendicealperitonealmetastasesscheduledforcrsandhipec
AT cashinpeterh prognosticimpactofbrafandkrasmutationinpatientswithcolorectalandappendicealperitonealmetastasesscheduledforcrsandhipec
AT ghanipourlana prognosticimpactofbrafandkrasmutationinpatientswithcolorectalandappendicealperitonealmetastasesscheduledforcrsandhipec
AT enbladmalin prognosticimpactofbrafandkrasmutationinpatientswithcolorectalandappendicealperitonealmetastasesscheduledforcrsandhipec
AT botlingjohan prognosticimpactofbrafandkrasmutationinpatientswithcolorectalandappendicealperitonealmetastasesscheduledforcrsandhipec
AT termanalexei prognosticimpactofbrafandkrasmutationinpatientswithcolorectalandappendicealperitonealmetastasesscheduledforcrsandhipec
AT birgissonhelgi prognosticimpactofbrafandkrasmutationinpatientswithcolorectalandappendicealperitonealmetastasesscheduledforcrsandhipec