Cargando…

Preventive Pharmacotherapy for Cardiovascular Disease: A Modelling Study Considering Health Gain, Costs, and Cost-Effectiveness when Stratifying by Absolute Risk

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death internationally. We aimed to model the impact of CVD preventive double therapy (a statin and anti-hypertensive) by clinician-assessed absolute risk level. An established and validated multi-state life-table model for the national New Zealand...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nghiem, Nhung, Knight, Josh, Mizdrak, Anja, Blakely, Tony, Wilson, Nick
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6925295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31862895
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-55372-8
_version_ 1783481891215638528
author Nghiem, Nhung
Knight, Josh
Mizdrak, Anja
Blakely, Tony
Wilson, Nick
author_facet Nghiem, Nhung
Knight, Josh
Mizdrak, Anja
Blakely, Tony
Wilson, Nick
author_sort Nghiem, Nhung
collection PubMed
description Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death internationally. We aimed to model the impact of CVD preventive double therapy (a statin and anti-hypertensive) by clinician-assessed absolute risk level. An established and validated multi-state life-table model for the national New Zealand (NZ) population was adapted. The new version of the model specifically considered the 60–64-year-old male population which was stratified by risk using a published NZ-specific CVD risk equation. The intervention period of treatment was for five years, but a lifetime horizon was used for measuring benefits and costs (a five-year horizon was also implemented). We found that for this group offering double therapy was highly cost-effective in all absolute risk categories (eg, NZ$1580 per QALY gained in the >20% in 5 years risk stratum; 95%UI: Dominant to NZ$3990). Even in the lowest risk stratum (≤5% risk in 5 years), the cost per QALY was only NZ$25,500 (NZ$28,200 and US$19,100 in 2018). At an individual level, the gain for those who responded to the screening offer and commenced preventive treatment ranged from 0.6 to 4.9 months of quality-adjusted life gained (or less than a month gain with a five-year horizon). Nevertheless, at the individual level, patient considerations are critical as some people may decide that this amount of average health gain does not justify taking daily medication.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6925295
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69252952019-12-24 Preventive Pharmacotherapy for Cardiovascular Disease: A Modelling Study Considering Health Gain, Costs, and Cost-Effectiveness when Stratifying by Absolute Risk Nghiem, Nhung Knight, Josh Mizdrak, Anja Blakely, Tony Wilson, Nick Sci Rep Article Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death internationally. We aimed to model the impact of CVD preventive double therapy (a statin and anti-hypertensive) by clinician-assessed absolute risk level. An established and validated multi-state life-table model for the national New Zealand (NZ) population was adapted. The new version of the model specifically considered the 60–64-year-old male population which was stratified by risk using a published NZ-specific CVD risk equation. The intervention period of treatment was for five years, but a lifetime horizon was used for measuring benefits and costs (a five-year horizon was also implemented). We found that for this group offering double therapy was highly cost-effective in all absolute risk categories (eg, NZ$1580 per QALY gained in the >20% in 5 years risk stratum; 95%UI: Dominant to NZ$3990). Even in the lowest risk stratum (≤5% risk in 5 years), the cost per QALY was only NZ$25,500 (NZ$28,200 and US$19,100 in 2018). At an individual level, the gain for those who responded to the screening offer and commenced preventive treatment ranged from 0.6 to 4.9 months of quality-adjusted life gained (or less than a month gain with a five-year horizon). Nevertheless, at the individual level, patient considerations are critical as some people may decide that this amount of average health gain does not justify taking daily medication. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6925295/ /pubmed/31862895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-55372-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Nghiem, Nhung
Knight, Josh
Mizdrak, Anja
Blakely, Tony
Wilson, Nick
Preventive Pharmacotherapy for Cardiovascular Disease: A Modelling Study Considering Health Gain, Costs, and Cost-Effectiveness when Stratifying by Absolute Risk
title Preventive Pharmacotherapy for Cardiovascular Disease: A Modelling Study Considering Health Gain, Costs, and Cost-Effectiveness when Stratifying by Absolute Risk
title_full Preventive Pharmacotherapy for Cardiovascular Disease: A Modelling Study Considering Health Gain, Costs, and Cost-Effectiveness when Stratifying by Absolute Risk
title_fullStr Preventive Pharmacotherapy for Cardiovascular Disease: A Modelling Study Considering Health Gain, Costs, and Cost-Effectiveness when Stratifying by Absolute Risk
title_full_unstemmed Preventive Pharmacotherapy for Cardiovascular Disease: A Modelling Study Considering Health Gain, Costs, and Cost-Effectiveness when Stratifying by Absolute Risk
title_short Preventive Pharmacotherapy for Cardiovascular Disease: A Modelling Study Considering Health Gain, Costs, and Cost-Effectiveness when Stratifying by Absolute Risk
title_sort preventive pharmacotherapy for cardiovascular disease: a modelling study considering health gain, costs, and cost-effectiveness when stratifying by absolute risk
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6925295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31862895
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-55372-8
work_keys_str_mv AT nghiemnhung preventivepharmacotherapyforcardiovasculardiseaseamodellingstudyconsideringhealthgaincostsandcosteffectivenesswhenstratifyingbyabsoluterisk
AT knightjosh preventivepharmacotherapyforcardiovasculardiseaseamodellingstudyconsideringhealthgaincostsandcosteffectivenesswhenstratifyingbyabsoluterisk
AT mizdrakanja preventivepharmacotherapyforcardiovasculardiseaseamodellingstudyconsideringhealthgaincostsandcosteffectivenesswhenstratifyingbyabsoluterisk
AT blakelytony preventivepharmacotherapyforcardiovasculardiseaseamodellingstudyconsideringhealthgaincostsandcosteffectivenesswhenstratifyingbyabsoluterisk
AT wilsonnick preventivepharmacotherapyforcardiovasculardiseaseamodellingstudyconsideringhealthgaincostsandcosteffectivenesswhenstratifyingbyabsoluterisk