Cargando…

Pooling arrangements in health financing systems: a proposed classification

OBJECTIVES: The function of pooling and the ways that countries organize this is critical for countries’ progress towards universal health coverage, but its potential as a policy instrument has not received much attention. We provide a simple classification of country pooling arrangements and discus...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mathauer, Inke, Saksena, Priyanka, Kutzin, Joe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6925450/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31864355
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-019-1088-x
_version_ 1783481916402434048
author Mathauer, Inke
Saksena, Priyanka
Kutzin, Joe
author_facet Mathauer, Inke
Saksena, Priyanka
Kutzin, Joe
author_sort Mathauer, Inke
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The function of pooling and the ways that countries organize this is critical for countries’ progress towards universal health coverage, but its potential as a policy instrument has not received much attention. We provide a simple classification of country pooling arrangements and discuss the specific ways that fragmentation manifests in each and the typical challenges with respect to universal health coverage objectives associated. This can help countries assess their pooling setup and contribute to identifying policy options to address fragmentation or mitigate its consequences. METHODS: The paper is based on a review of published and grey literature in PubMed, Google and Google Scholar and our information gathered from our professional work in countries on health financing policies. We examined the nature and structure of pooling in more than 100 countries across all income groups to develop the classification. FINDINGS: We propose eight broad types of pooling arrangements: (1.) a single pool; (2.) territorially distinct pools; (3.) territorially overlapping pools in terms of service and population coverage; (4.) different pools for different socio-economic groups with population segmentation; (5.) different pools for different population groups, with explicit coverage for all; (6.) multiple competing pools with risk adjustment across the pools; and in combination with types (1.)-(6.), (7.) fragmented systems with voluntary health insurance, duplicating publicly financed coverage; and (8.) complementary or supplementary voluntary health insurance. However, we recognize that any classification is a simplification of reality and does not substitute for a country-specific analysis of pooling arrangements. CONCLUSION: Pooling arrangements set the potential for redistributive health spending. The extent to which the potential redistributive and efficiency gains established by a particular pooling arrangement are realized in practice depends on its interaction and alignment with the other health financing functions of revenue raising and purchasing, including the links between pools and the service benefits and populations they cover.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6925450
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69254502019-12-30 Pooling arrangements in health financing systems: a proposed classification Mathauer, Inke Saksena, Priyanka Kutzin, Joe Int J Equity Health Research OBJECTIVES: The function of pooling and the ways that countries organize this is critical for countries’ progress towards universal health coverage, but its potential as a policy instrument has not received much attention. We provide a simple classification of country pooling arrangements and discuss the specific ways that fragmentation manifests in each and the typical challenges with respect to universal health coverage objectives associated. This can help countries assess their pooling setup and contribute to identifying policy options to address fragmentation or mitigate its consequences. METHODS: The paper is based on a review of published and grey literature in PubMed, Google and Google Scholar and our information gathered from our professional work in countries on health financing policies. We examined the nature and structure of pooling in more than 100 countries across all income groups to develop the classification. FINDINGS: We propose eight broad types of pooling arrangements: (1.) a single pool; (2.) territorially distinct pools; (3.) territorially overlapping pools in terms of service and population coverage; (4.) different pools for different socio-economic groups with population segmentation; (5.) different pools for different population groups, with explicit coverage for all; (6.) multiple competing pools with risk adjustment across the pools; and in combination with types (1.)-(6.), (7.) fragmented systems with voluntary health insurance, duplicating publicly financed coverage; and (8.) complementary or supplementary voluntary health insurance. However, we recognize that any classification is a simplification of reality and does not substitute for a country-specific analysis of pooling arrangements. CONCLUSION: Pooling arrangements set the potential for redistributive health spending. The extent to which the potential redistributive and efficiency gains established by a particular pooling arrangement are realized in practice depends on its interaction and alignment with the other health financing functions of revenue raising and purchasing, including the links between pools and the service benefits and populations they cover. BioMed Central 2019-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6925450/ /pubmed/31864355 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-019-1088-x Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Mathauer, Inke
Saksena, Priyanka
Kutzin, Joe
Pooling arrangements in health financing systems: a proposed classification
title Pooling arrangements in health financing systems: a proposed classification
title_full Pooling arrangements in health financing systems: a proposed classification
title_fullStr Pooling arrangements in health financing systems: a proposed classification
title_full_unstemmed Pooling arrangements in health financing systems: a proposed classification
title_short Pooling arrangements in health financing systems: a proposed classification
title_sort pooling arrangements in health financing systems: a proposed classification
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6925450/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31864355
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-019-1088-x
work_keys_str_mv AT mathauerinke poolingarrangementsinhealthfinancingsystemsaproposedclassification
AT saksenapriyanka poolingarrangementsinhealthfinancingsystemsaproposedclassification
AT kutzinjoe poolingarrangementsinhealthfinancingsystemsaproposedclassification