Cargando…
Pooling arrangements in health financing systems: a proposed classification
OBJECTIVES: The function of pooling and the ways that countries organize this is critical for countries’ progress towards universal health coverage, but its potential as a policy instrument has not received much attention. We provide a simple classification of country pooling arrangements and discus...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6925450/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31864355 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-019-1088-x |
_version_ | 1783481916402434048 |
---|---|
author | Mathauer, Inke Saksena, Priyanka Kutzin, Joe |
author_facet | Mathauer, Inke Saksena, Priyanka Kutzin, Joe |
author_sort | Mathauer, Inke |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The function of pooling and the ways that countries organize this is critical for countries’ progress towards universal health coverage, but its potential as a policy instrument has not received much attention. We provide a simple classification of country pooling arrangements and discuss the specific ways that fragmentation manifests in each and the typical challenges with respect to universal health coverage objectives associated. This can help countries assess their pooling setup and contribute to identifying policy options to address fragmentation or mitigate its consequences. METHODS: The paper is based on a review of published and grey literature in PubMed, Google and Google Scholar and our information gathered from our professional work in countries on health financing policies. We examined the nature and structure of pooling in more than 100 countries across all income groups to develop the classification. FINDINGS: We propose eight broad types of pooling arrangements: (1.) a single pool; (2.) territorially distinct pools; (3.) territorially overlapping pools in terms of service and population coverage; (4.) different pools for different socio-economic groups with population segmentation; (5.) different pools for different population groups, with explicit coverage for all; (6.) multiple competing pools with risk adjustment across the pools; and in combination with types (1.)-(6.), (7.) fragmented systems with voluntary health insurance, duplicating publicly financed coverage; and (8.) complementary or supplementary voluntary health insurance. However, we recognize that any classification is a simplification of reality and does not substitute for a country-specific analysis of pooling arrangements. CONCLUSION: Pooling arrangements set the potential for redistributive health spending. The extent to which the potential redistributive and efficiency gains established by a particular pooling arrangement are realized in practice depends on its interaction and alignment with the other health financing functions of revenue raising and purchasing, including the links between pools and the service benefits and populations they cover. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6925450 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69254502019-12-30 Pooling arrangements in health financing systems: a proposed classification Mathauer, Inke Saksena, Priyanka Kutzin, Joe Int J Equity Health Research OBJECTIVES: The function of pooling and the ways that countries organize this is critical for countries’ progress towards universal health coverage, but its potential as a policy instrument has not received much attention. We provide a simple classification of country pooling arrangements and discuss the specific ways that fragmentation manifests in each and the typical challenges with respect to universal health coverage objectives associated. This can help countries assess their pooling setup and contribute to identifying policy options to address fragmentation or mitigate its consequences. METHODS: The paper is based on a review of published and grey literature in PubMed, Google and Google Scholar and our information gathered from our professional work in countries on health financing policies. We examined the nature and structure of pooling in more than 100 countries across all income groups to develop the classification. FINDINGS: We propose eight broad types of pooling arrangements: (1.) a single pool; (2.) territorially distinct pools; (3.) territorially overlapping pools in terms of service and population coverage; (4.) different pools for different socio-economic groups with population segmentation; (5.) different pools for different population groups, with explicit coverage for all; (6.) multiple competing pools with risk adjustment across the pools; and in combination with types (1.)-(6.), (7.) fragmented systems with voluntary health insurance, duplicating publicly financed coverage; and (8.) complementary or supplementary voluntary health insurance. However, we recognize that any classification is a simplification of reality and does not substitute for a country-specific analysis of pooling arrangements. CONCLUSION: Pooling arrangements set the potential for redistributive health spending. The extent to which the potential redistributive and efficiency gains established by a particular pooling arrangement are realized in practice depends on its interaction and alignment with the other health financing functions of revenue raising and purchasing, including the links between pools and the service benefits and populations they cover. BioMed Central 2019-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6925450/ /pubmed/31864355 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-019-1088-x Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Mathauer, Inke Saksena, Priyanka Kutzin, Joe Pooling arrangements in health financing systems: a proposed classification |
title | Pooling arrangements in health financing systems: a proposed classification |
title_full | Pooling arrangements in health financing systems: a proposed classification |
title_fullStr | Pooling arrangements in health financing systems: a proposed classification |
title_full_unstemmed | Pooling arrangements in health financing systems: a proposed classification |
title_short | Pooling arrangements in health financing systems: a proposed classification |
title_sort | pooling arrangements in health financing systems: a proposed classification |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6925450/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31864355 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-019-1088-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mathauerinke poolingarrangementsinhealthfinancingsystemsaproposedclassification AT saksenapriyanka poolingarrangementsinhealthfinancingsystemsaproposedclassification AT kutzinjoe poolingarrangementsinhealthfinancingsystemsaproposedclassification |