Cargando…
Accuracy and clinical safety of guided root end resection with a trephine: a case series
BACKGROUND: Root-end resection is an endodontic surgical intervention that requires high precision so that all ramifications and lateral canals so as infected tissues are eliminated. An exploratory study was conducted to justify the clinical safety and accuracy of guided root-end resection with a tr...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6925511/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31861995 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13005-019-0214-8 |
_version_ | 1783481930076913664 |
---|---|
author | Antal, Márk Nagy, Eszter Braunitzer, Gábor Fráter, Márk Piffkó, József |
author_facet | Antal, Márk Nagy, Eszter Braunitzer, Gábor Fráter, Márk Piffkó, József |
author_sort | Antal, Márk |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Root-end resection is an endodontic surgical intervention that requires high precision so that all ramifications and lateral canals so as infected tissues are eliminated. An exploratory study was conducted to justify the clinical safety and accuracy of guided root-end resection with a trephine. METHODS: Fourteen root-end resections were performed in 11 patients. With the aid of computer tomography and rapid prototyping a stereolithographically fabricated, tooth-supported surgical template was used to guide trephinations. Surgery was performed using the printed surgical stent and a trephine was used not only for the osteotomy but for the root end resection as well. RESULTS: The root end was successfully and completely resected by the trephine in all cases. No intraoperative complications were observed in any of the cases, and the patients were free of symptoms indicating recurrence or complications at the 6-month follow-up. The median angular deviation of the trephination was 3.95° (95% CI: 2.1–5.9), comparable to the angular deviation of guided implant surgery. The mean apex removal error (ARE) was 0.19 mm (95% CI: 0.03–0.07). The mean osteotomy depth error (ODE) was 0.37 mm (95% CI: 0.15–1.35). Overpenetration was a characteristic finding, which indicates the necessity of a stop-trephine. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this study, we conclude that our results support the use of guided trephination for root-end resection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6925511 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69255112019-12-30 Accuracy and clinical safety of guided root end resection with a trephine: a case series Antal, Márk Nagy, Eszter Braunitzer, Gábor Fráter, Márk Piffkó, József Head Face Med Methodology BACKGROUND: Root-end resection is an endodontic surgical intervention that requires high precision so that all ramifications and lateral canals so as infected tissues are eliminated. An exploratory study was conducted to justify the clinical safety and accuracy of guided root-end resection with a trephine. METHODS: Fourteen root-end resections were performed in 11 patients. With the aid of computer tomography and rapid prototyping a stereolithographically fabricated, tooth-supported surgical template was used to guide trephinations. Surgery was performed using the printed surgical stent and a trephine was used not only for the osteotomy but for the root end resection as well. RESULTS: The root end was successfully and completely resected by the trephine in all cases. No intraoperative complications were observed in any of the cases, and the patients were free of symptoms indicating recurrence or complications at the 6-month follow-up. The median angular deviation of the trephination was 3.95° (95% CI: 2.1–5.9), comparable to the angular deviation of guided implant surgery. The mean apex removal error (ARE) was 0.19 mm (95% CI: 0.03–0.07). The mean osteotomy depth error (ODE) was 0.37 mm (95% CI: 0.15–1.35). Overpenetration was a characteristic finding, which indicates the necessity of a stop-trephine. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this study, we conclude that our results support the use of guided trephination for root-end resection. BioMed Central 2019-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6925511/ /pubmed/31861995 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13005-019-0214-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Antal, Márk Nagy, Eszter Braunitzer, Gábor Fráter, Márk Piffkó, József Accuracy and clinical safety of guided root end resection with a trephine: a case series |
title | Accuracy and clinical safety of guided root end resection with a trephine: a case series |
title_full | Accuracy and clinical safety of guided root end resection with a trephine: a case series |
title_fullStr | Accuracy and clinical safety of guided root end resection with a trephine: a case series |
title_full_unstemmed | Accuracy and clinical safety of guided root end resection with a trephine: a case series |
title_short | Accuracy and clinical safety of guided root end resection with a trephine: a case series |
title_sort | accuracy and clinical safety of guided root end resection with a trephine: a case series |
topic | Methodology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6925511/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31861995 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13005-019-0214-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT antalmark accuracyandclinicalsafetyofguidedrootendresectionwithatrephineacaseseries AT nagyeszter accuracyandclinicalsafetyofguidedrootendresectionwithatrephineacaseseries AT braunitzergabor accuracyandclinicalsafetyofguidedrootendresectionwithatrephineacaseseries AT fratermark accuracyandclinicalsafetyofguidedrootendresectionwithatrephineacaseseries AT piffkojozsef accuracyandclinicalsafetyofguidedrootendresectionwithatrephineacaseseries |