Cargando…

The Systematic Review Data Repository (SRDR): descriptive characteristics of publicly available data and opportunities for research

BACKGROUND: Conducting systematic reviews (“reviews”) requires a great deal of effort and resources. Making data extracted during reviews available publicly could offer many benefits, including reducing unnecessary duplication of effort, standardizing data, supporting analyses to address secondary r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saldanha, Ian J., Smith, Bryant T., Ntzani, Evangelia, Jap, Jens, Balk, Ethan M., Lau, Joseph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6925515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31862012
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1250-y
_version_ 1783481931005952000
author Saldanha, Ian J.
Smith, Bryant T.
Ntzani, Evangelia
Jap, Jens
Balk, Ethan M.
Lau, Joseph
author_facet Saldanha, Ian J.
Smith, Bryant T.
Ntzani, Evangelia
Jap, Jens
Balk, Ethan M.
Lau, Joseph
author_sort Saldanha, Ian J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Conducting systematic reviews (“reviews”) requires a great deal of effort and resources. Making data extracted during reviews available publicly could offer many benefits, including reducing unnecessary duplication of effort, standardizing data, supporting analyses to address secondary research questions, and facilitating methodologic research. Funded by the US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), the Systematic Review Data Repository (SRDR) is a free, web-based, open-source, data management and archival platform for reviews. Our specific objectives in this paper are to describe (1) the current extent of usage of SRDR and (2) the characteristics of all projects with publicly available data on the SRDR website. METHODS: We examined all projects with data made publicly available through SRDR as of November 12, 2019. We extracted information about the characteristics of these projects. Two investigators extracted and verified the data. RESULTS: SRDR has had 2552 individual user accounts belonging to users from 80 countries. Since SRDR’s launch in 2012, data have been made available publicly for 152 of the 735 projects in SRDR (21%), at a rate of 24.5 projects per year, on average. Most projects are in clinical fields (144/152 projects; 95%); most have evaluated interventions (therapeutic or preventive) (109/152; 72%). The most frequent health areas addressed are mental and behavioral disorders (31/152; 20%) and diseases of the eye and ocular adnexa (23/152; 15%). Two-thirds of the projects (104/152; 67%) were funded by AHRQ, and one-sixth (23/152; 15%) are Cochrane reviews. The 152 projects each address a median of 3 research questions (IQR 1–5) and include a median of 70 studies (IQR 20–130). CONCLUSIONS: Until we arrive at a future in which the systematic review and broader research communities are comfortable with the accuracy of automated data extraction, re-use of data extracted by humans has the potential to help reduce redundancy and costs. The 152 projects with publicly available data through SRDR, and the more than 15,000 studies therein, are freely available to researchers and the general public who might be working on similar reviews or updates of reviews or who want access to the data for decision-making, meta-research, or other purposes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6925515
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69255152019-12-30 The Systematic Review Data Repository (SRDR): descriptive characteristics of publicly available data and opportunities for research Saldanha, Ian J. Smith, Bryant T. Ntzani, Evangelia Jap, Jens Balk, Ethan M. Lau, Joseph Syst Rev Research BACKGROUND: Conducting systematic reviews (“reviews”) requires a great deal of effort and resources. Making data extracted during reviews available publicly could offer many benefits, including reducing unnecessary duplication of effort, standardizing data, supporting analyses to address secondary research questions, and facilitating methodologic research. Funded by the US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), the Systematic Review Data Repository (SRDR) is a free, web-based, open-source, data management and archival platform for reviews. Our specific objectives in this paper are to describe (1) the current extent of usage of SRDR and (2) the characteristics of all projects with publicly available data on the SRDR website. METHODS: We examined all projects with data made publicly available through SRDR as of November 12, 2019. We extracted information about the characteristics of these projects. Two investigators extracted and verified the data. RESULTS: SRDR has had 2552 individual user accounts belonging to users from 80 countries. Since SRDR’s launch in 2012, data have been made available publicly for 152 of the 735 projects in SRDR (21%), at a rate of 24.5 projects per year, on average. Most projects are in clinical fields (144/152 projects; 95%); most have evaluated interventions (therapeutic or preventive) (109/152; 72%). The most frequent health areas addressed are mental and behavioral disorders (31/152; 20%) and diseases of the eye and ocular adnexa (23/152; 15%). Two-thirds of the projects (104/152; 67%) were funded by AHRQ, and one-sixth (23/152; 15%) are Cochrane reviews. The 152 projects each address a median of 3 research questions (IQR 1–5) and include a median of 70 studies (IQR 20–130). CONCLUSIONS: Until we arrive at a future in which the systematic review and broader research communities are comfortable with the accuracy of automated data extraction, re-use of data extracted by humans has the potential to help reduce redundancy and costs. The 152 projects with publicly available data through SRDR, and the more than 15,000 studies therein, are freely available to researchers and the general public who might be working on similar reviews or updates of reviews or who want access to the data for decision-making, meta-research, or other purposes. BioMed Central 2019-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6925515/ /pubmed/31862012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1250-y Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Saldanha, Ian J.
Smith, Bryant T.
Ntzani, Evangelia
Jap, Jens
Balk, Ethan M.
Lau, Joseph
The Systematic Review Data Repository (SRDR): descriptive characteristics of publicly available data and opportunities for research
title The Systematic Review Data Repository (SRDR): descriptive characteristics of publicly available data and opportunities for research
title_full The Systematic Review Data Repository (SRDR): descriptive characteristics of publicly available data and opportunities for research
title_fullStr The Systematic Review Data Repository (SRDR): descriptive characteristics of publicly available data and opportunities for research
title_full_unstemmed The Systematic Review Data Repository (SRDR): descriptive characteristics of publicly available data and opportunities for research
title_short The Systematic Review Data Repository (SRDR): descriptive characteristics of publicly available data and opportunities for research
title_sort systematic review data repository (srdr): descriptive characteristics of publicly available data and opportunities for research
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6925515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31862012
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1250-y
work_keys_str_mv AT saldanhaianj thesystematicreviewdatarepositorysrdrdescriptivecharacteristicsofpubliclyavailabledataandopportunitiesforresearch
AT smithbryantt thesystematicreviewdatarepositorysrdrdescriptivecharacteristicsofpubliclyavailabledataandopportunitiesforresearch
AT ntzanievangelia thesystematicreviewdatarepositorysrdrdescriptivecharacteristicsofpubliclyavailabledataandopportunitiesforresearch
AT japjens thesystematicreviewdatarepositorysrdrdescriptivecharacteristicsofpubliclyavailabledataandopportunitiesforresearch
AT balkethanm thesystematicreviewdatarepositorysrdrdescriptivecharacteristicsofpubliclyavailabledataandopportunitiesforresearch
AT laujoseph thesystematicreviewdatarepositorysrdrdescriptivecharacteristicsofpubliclyavailabledataandopportunitiesforresearch
AT saldanhaianj systematicreviewdatarepositorysrdrdescriptivecharacteristicsofpubliclyavailabledataandopportunitiesforresearch
AT smithbryantt systematicreviewdatarepositorysrdrdescriptivecharacteristicsofpubliclyavailabledataandopportunitiesforresearch
AT ntzanievangelia systematicreviewdatarepositorysrdrdescriptivecharacteristicsofpubliclyavailabledataandopportunitiesforresearch
AT japjens systematicreviewdatarepositorysrdrdescriptivecharacteristicsofpubliclyavailabledataandopportunitiesforresearch
AT balkethanm systematicreviewdatarepositorysrdrdescriptivecharacteristicsofpubliclyavailabledataandopportunitiesforresearch
AT laujoseph systematicreviewdatarepositorysrdrdescriptivecharacteristicsofpubliclyavailabledataandopportunitiesforresearch