Cargando…
Biomechanical Evaluation and Strength Test of 3D-Printed Foot Orthoses
Foot orthoses (FOs) are commonly used as interventions for individuals with flatfoot. Advances in technologies such as three-dimensional (3D) scanning and 3D printing have facilitated the fabrication of custom FOs. However, few studies have been conducted on the mechanical properties and biomechanic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6925755/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31885687 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/4989534 |
_version_ | 1783481967840329728 |
---|---|
author | Lin, Kuang-Wei Hu, Chia-Jung Yang, Wen-Wen Chou, Li-Wei Wei, Shun-Hwa Chen, Chen-Sheng Sun, Pi-Chang |
author_facet | Lin, Kuang-Wei Hu, Chia-Jung Yang, Wen-Wen Chou, Li-Wei Wei, Shun-Hwa Chen, Chen-Sheng Sun, Pi-Chang |
author_sort | Lin, Kuang-Wei |
collection | PubMed |
description | Foot orthoses (FOs) are commonly used as interventions for individuals with flatfoot. Advances in technologies such as three-dimensional (3D) scanning and 3D printing have facilitated the fabrication of custom FOs. However, few studies have been conducted on the mechanical properties and biomechanical effects of 3D-printed FOs. The purposes of this study were to evaluate the mechanical properties of 3D-printed FOs and determine their biomechanical effects in individuals with flexible flatfoot. During mechanical testing, a total of 18 FO samples with three orientations (0°, 45°, and 90°) were fabricated and tested. The maximum compressive load and stiffness were calculated. During a motion capture experiment, 12 individuals with flatfoot were enrolled, and the 3D-printed FOs were used as interventions. Kinematic and kinetic data were collected during walking by using an optical motion capture system. A one-way analysis of variance was performed to compare the mechanical parameters among the three build orientations. A paired t-test was conducted to compare the biomechanical variables under two conditions: walking in standard shoes (Shoe) and walking in shoes embedded with FOs (Shoe+FO). The results indicated that the 45° build orientation produced the strongest FOs. In addition, the maximum ankle evertor and external rotator moments under the Shoe+FO condition were significantly reduced by 35% and 16%, respectively, but the maximum ankle plantar flexor moments increased by 3%, compared with the Shoe condition. No significant difference in ground reaction force was observed between the two conditions. This study demonstrated that 3D-printed FOs could alter the ankle joint moments during gait. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6925755 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69257552019-12-29 Biomechanical Evaluation and Strength Test of 3D-Printed Foot Orthoses Lin, Kuang-Wei Hu, Chia-Jung Yang, Wen-Wen Chou, Li-Wei Wei, Shun-Hwa Chen, Chen-Sheng Sun, Pi-Chang Appl Bionics Biomech Research Article Foot orthoses (FOs) are commonly used as interventions for individuals with flatfoot. Advances in technologies such as three-dimensional (3D) scanning and 3D printing have facilitated the fabrication of custom FOs. However, few studies have been conducted on the mechanical properties and biomechanical effects of 3D-printed FOs. The purposes of this study were to evaluate the mechanical properties of 3D-printed FOs and determine their biomechanical effects in individuals with flexible flatfoot. During mechanical testing, a total of 18 FO samples with three orientations (0°, 45°, and 90°) were fabricated and tested. The maximum compressive load and stiffness were calculated. During a motion capture experiment, 12 individuals with flatfoot were enrolled, and the 3D-printed FOs were used as interventions. Kinematic and kinetic data were collected during walking by using an optical motion capture system. A one-way analysis of variance was performed to compare the mechanical parameters among the three build orientations. A paired t-test was conducted to compare the biomechanical variables under two conditions: walking in standard shoes (Shoe) and walking in shoes embedded with FOs (Shoe+FO). The results indicated that the 45° build orientation produced the strongest FOs. In addition, the maximum ankle evertor and external rotator moments under the Shoe+FO condition were significantly reduced by 35% and 16%, respectively, but the maximum ankle plantar flexor moments increased by 3%, compared with the Shoe condition. No significant difference in ground reaction force was observed between the two conditions. This study demonstrated that 3D-printed FOs could alter the ankle joint moments during gait. Hindawi 2019-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6925755/ /pubmed/31885687 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/4989534 Text en Copyright © 2019 Kuang-Wei Lin et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lin, Kuang-Wei Hu, Chia-Jung Yang, Wen-Wen Chou, Li-Wei Wei, Shun-Hwa Chen, Chen-Sheng Sun, Pi-Chang Biomechanical Evaluation and Strength Test of 3D-Printed Foot Orthoses |
title | Biomechanical Evaluation and Strength Test of 3D-Printed Foot Orthoses |
title_full | Biomechanical Evaluation and Strength Test of 3D-Printed Foot Orthoses |
title_fullStr | Biomechanical Evaluation and Strength Test of 3D-Printed Foot Orthoses |
title_full_unstemmed | Biomechanical Evaluation and Strength Test of 3D-Printed Foot Orthoses |
title_short | Biomechanical Evaluation and Strength Test of 3D-Printed Foot Orthoses |
title_sort | biomechanical evaluation and strength test of 3d-printed foot orthoses |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6925755/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31885687 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/4989534 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT linkuangwei biomechanicalevaluationandstrengthtestof3dprintedfootorthoses AT huchiajung biomechanicalevaluationandstrengthtestof3dprintedfootorthoses AT yangwenwen biomechanicalevaluationandstrengthtestof3dprintedfootorthoses AT chouliwei biomechanicalevaluationandstrengthtestof3dprintedfootorthoses AT weishunhwa biomechanicalevaluationandstrengthtestof3dprintedfootorthoses AT chenchensheng biomechanicalevaluationandstrengthtestof3dprintedfootorthoses AT sunpichang biomechanicalevaluationandstrengthtestof3dprintedfootorthoses |