Cargando…

Biomechanical Evaluation and Strength Test of 3D-Printed Foot Orthoses

Foot orthoses (FOs) are commonly used as interventions for individuals with flatfoot. Advances in technologies such as three-dimensional (3D) scanning and 3D printing have facilitated the fabrication of custom FOs. However, few studies have been conducted on the mechanical properties and biomechanic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Kuang-Wei, Hu, Chia-Jung, Yang, Wen-Wen, Chou, Li-Wei, Wei, Shun-Hwa, Chen, Chen-Sheng, Sun, Pi-Chang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6925755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31885687
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/4989534
_version_ 1783481967840329728
author Lin, Kuang-Wei
Hu, Chia-Jung
Yang, Wen-Wen
Chou, Li-Wei
Wei, Shun-Hwa
Chen, Chen-Sheng
Sun, Pi-Chang
author_facet Lin, Kuang-Wei
Hu, Chia-Jung
Yang, Wen-Wen
Chou, Li-Wei
Wei, Shun-Hwa
Chen, Chen-Sheng
Sun, Pi-Chang
author_sort Lin, Kuang-Wei
collection PubMed
description Foot orthoses (FOs) are commonly used as interventions for individuals with flatfoot. Advances in technologies such as three-dimensional (3D) scanning and 3D printing have facilitated the fabrication of custom FOs. However, few studies have been conducted on the mechanical properties and biomechanical effects of 3D-printed FOs. The purposes of this study were to evaluate the mechanical properties of 3D-printed FOs and determine their biomechanical effects in individuals with flexible flatfoot. During mechanical testing, a total of 18 FO samples with three orientations (0°, 45°, and 90°) were fabricated and tested. The maximum compressive load and stiffness were calculated. During a motion capture experiment, 12 individuals with flatfoot were enrolled, and the 3D-printed FOs were used as interventions. Kinematic and kinetic data were collected during walking by using an optical motion capture system. A one-way analysis of variance was performed to compare the mechanical parameters among the three build orientations. A paired t-test was conducted to compare the biomechanical variables under two conditions: walking in standard shoes (Shoe) and walking in shoes embedded with FOs (Shoe+FO). The results indicated that the 45° build orientation produced the strongest FOs. In addition, the maximum ankle evertor and external rotator moments under the Shoe+FO condition were significantly reduced by 35% and 16%, respectively, but the maximum ankle plantar flexor moments increased by 3%, compared with the Shoe condition. No significant difference in ground reaction force was observed between the two conditions. This study demonstrated that 3D-printed FOs could alter the ankle joint moments during gait.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6925755
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69257552019-12-29 Biomechanical Evaluation and Strength Test of 3D-Printed Foot Orthoses Lin, Kuang-Wei Hu, Chia-Jung Yang, Wen-Wen Chou, Li-Wei Wei, Shun-Hwa Chen, Chen-Sheng Sun, Pi-Chang Appl Bionics Biomech Research Article Foot orthoses (FOs) are commonly used as interventions for individuals with flatfoot. Advances in technologies such as three-dimensional (3D) scanning and 3D printing have facilitated the fabrication of custom FOs. However, few studies have been conducted on the mechanical properties and biomechanical effects of 3D-printed FOs. The purposes of this study were to evaluate the mechanical properties of 3D-printed FOs and determine their biomechanical effects in individuals with flexible flatfoot. During mechanical testing, a total of 18 FO samples with three orientations (0°, 45°, and 90°) were fabricated and tested. The maximum compressive load and stiffness were calculated. During a motion capture experiment, 12 individuals with flatfoot were enrolled, and the 3D-printed FOs were used as interventions. Kinematic and kinetic data were collected during walking by using an optical motion capture system. A one-way analysis of variance was performed to compare the mechanical parameters among the three build orientations. A paired t-test was conducted to compare the biomechanical variables under two conditions: walking in standard shoes (Shoe) and walking in shoes embedded with FOs (Shoe+FO). The results indicated that the 45° build orientation produced the strongest FOs. In addition, the maximum ankle evertor and external rotator moments under the Shoe+FO condition were significantly reduced by 35% and 16%, respectively, but the maximum ankle plantar flexor moments increased by 3%, compared with the Shoe condition. No significant difference in ground reaction force was observed between the two conditions. This study demonstrated that 3D-printed FOs could alter the ankle joint moments during gait. Hindawi 2019-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6925755/ /pubmed/31885687 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/4989534 Text en Copyright © 2019 Kuang-Wei Lin et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lin, Kuang-Wei
Hu, Chia-Jung
Yang, Wen-Wen
Chou, Li-Wei
Wei, Shun-Hwa
Chen, Chen-Sheng
Sun, Pi-Chang
Biomechanical Evaluation and Strength Test of 3D-Printed Foot Orthoses
title Biomechanical Evaluation and Strength Test of 3D-Printed Foot Orthoses
title_full Biomechanical Evaluation and Strength Test of 3D-Printed Foot Orthoses
title_fullStr Biomechanical Evaluation and Strength Test of 3D-Printed Foot Orthoses
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical Evaluation and Strength Test of 3D-Printed Foot Orthoses
title_short Biomechanical Evaluation and Strength Test of 3D-Printed Foot Orthoses
title_sort biomechanical evaluation and strength test of 3d-printed foot orthoses
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6925755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31885687
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/4989534
work_keys_str_mv AT linkuangwei biomechanicalevaluationandstrengthtestof3dprintedfootorthoses
AT huchiajung biomechanicalevaluationandstrengthtestof3dprintedfootorthoses
AT yangwenwen biomechanicalevaluationandstrengthtestof3dprintedfootorthoses
AT chouliwei biomechanicalevaluationandstrengthtestof3dprintedfootorthoses
AT weishunhwa biomechanicalevaluationandstrengthtestof3dprintedfootorthoses
AT chenchensheng biomechanicalevaluationandstrengthtestof3dprintedfootorthoses
AT sunpichang biomechanicalevaluationandstrengthtestof3dprintedfootorthoses