Cargando…

Comparison of methylation patterns generated from genomic and cell-line derived DNA using the Illumina Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChip array

OBJECTIVES: Genomic DNA (gDNA) is the optimal source of DNA for methylation analysis. This study compared methylation patterns in gDNA derived from blood with cell-line derived DNA (clDNA) from the same individuals. The clDNA had been generated via an Epstein-Barr virus transformation of the partici...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smyth, L. J., Kilner, J., Maxwell, A. P., McKnight, A. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6925854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31864401
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-019-4853-4
_version_ 1783481990927876096
author Smyth, L. J.
Kilner, J.
Maxwell, A. P.
McKnight, A. J.
author_facet Smyth, L. J.
Kilner, J.
Maxwell, A. P.
McKnight, A. J.
author_sort Smyth, L. J.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Genomic DNA (gDNA) is the optimal source of DNA for methylation analysis. This study compared methylation patterns in gDNA derived from blood with cell-line derived DNA (clDNA) from the same individuals. The clDNA had been generated via an Epstein-Barr virus transformation of the participant’s lymphocytes. This analysis sought to determine whether clDNA has the potential to be utilised in lieu of finite/unavailable gDNA in methylation analyses using Illumina Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChip arrays that assess 862,927 CpG sites. RESULTS: DNA samples were divided into two groups with eight gDNA and eight matched clDNA samples compared in each group (n = 16 individuals with 32 samples in total). Methylation patterns for gDNA samples generated for both groups were compared to the clDNA equivalent samples using Partek(®) Genomics Suite(®) to assess whether the significantly different CpG sites were consistent between both groups. In total, 28,632 CpG sites with significantly different levels of methylation (p < ×10(−8)) were common to both groups while 828,072 CpG sites assessed by the MethylationEPIC array were not significantly different in either group. This indicates that there is potential for clDNA to be used as a replacement for finite gDNA samples when absolutely necessary in DNA methylation studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6925854
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69258542019-12-30 Comparison of methylation patterns generated from genomic and cell-line derived DNA using the Illumina Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChip array Smyth, L. J. Kilner, J. Maxwell, A. P. McKnight, A. J. BMC Res Notes Research Note OBJECTIVES: Genomic DNA (gDNA) is the optimal source of DNA for methylation analysis. This study compared methylation patterns in gDNA derived from blood with cell-line derived DNA (clDNA) from the same individuals. The clDNA had been generated via an Epstein-Barr virus transformation of the participant’s lymphocytes. This analysis sought to determine whether clDNA has the potential to be utilised in lieu of finite/unavailable gDNA in methylation analyses using Illumina Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChip arrays that assess 862,927 CpG sites. RESULTS: DNA samples were divided into two groups with eight gDNA and eight matched clDNA samples compared in each group (n = 16 individuals with 32 samples in total). Methylation patterns for gDNA samples generated for both groups were compared to the clDNA equivalent samples using Partek(®) Genomics Suite(®) to assess whether the significantly different CpG sites were consistent between both groups. In total, 28,632 CpG sites with significantly different levels of methylation (p < ×10(−8)) were common to both groups while 828,072 CpG sites assessed by the MethylationEPIC array were not significantly different in either group. This indicates that there is potential for clDNA to be used as a replacement for finite gDNA samples when absolutely necessary in DNA methylation studies. BioMed Central 2019-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6925854/ /pubmed/31864401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-019-4853-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Note
Smyth, L. J.
Kilner, J.
Maxwell, A. P.
McKnight, A. J.
Comparison of methylation patterns generated from genomic and cell-line derived DNA using the Illumina Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChip array
title Comparison of methylation patterns generated from genomic and cell-line derived DNA using the Illumina Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChip array
title_full Comparison of methylation patterns generated from genomic and cell-line derived DNA using the Illumina Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChip array
title_fullStr Comparison of methylation patterns generated from genomic and cell-line derived DNA using the Illumina Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChip array
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of methylation patterns generated from genomic and cell-line derived DNA using the Illumina Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChip array
title_short Comparison of methylation patterns generated from genomic and cell-line derived DNA using the Illumina Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChip array
title_sort comparison of methylation patterns generated from genomic and cell-line derived dna using the illumina infinium methylationepic beadchip array
topic Research Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6925854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31864401
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-019-4853-4
work_keys_str_mv AT smythlj comparisonofmethylationpatternsgeneratedfromgenomicandcelllinederiveddnausingtheilluminainfiniummethylationepicbeadchiparray
AT kilnerj comparisonofmethylationpatternsgeneratedfromgenomicandcelllinederiveddnausingtheilluminainfiniummethylationepicbeadchiparray
AT maxwellap comparisonofmethylationpatternsgeneratedfromgenomicandcelllinederiveddnausingtheilluminainfiniummethylationepicbeadchiparray
AT mcknightaj comparisonofmethylationpatternsgeneratedfromgenomicandcelllinederiveddnausingtheilluminainfiniummethylationepicbeadchiparray