Cargando…

Complementary medicine use among Australian patients in an acute hospital setting: an exploratory, cross sectional study

BACKGROUND: The use of Complementary Medicines (CMs) has significantly increased in Australia over the last decade. This study attempts to determine the extent to which complementary and alternative medicines are recorded, ceased or initiated in the acute hospital setting and investigate which healt...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Waddington, Freya, Lee, Jenny, Naunton, Mark, Kyle, Greg, Thomas, Jackson, O’Kane, Gabrielle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6925895/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31864327
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12906-019-2788-x
_version_ 1783482000631398400
author Waddington, Freya
Lee, Jenny
Naunton, Mark
Kyle, Greg
Thomas, Jackson
O’Kane, Gabrielle
author_facet Waddington, Freya
Lee, Jenny
Naunton, Mark
Kyle, Greg
Thomas, Jackson
O’Kane, Gabrielle
author_sort Waddington, Freya
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The use of Complementary Medicines (CMs) has significantly increased in Australia over the last decade. This study attempts to determine the extent to which complementary and alternative medicines are recorded, ceased or initiated in the acute hospital setting and investigate which health professionals have a role in this process. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of inpatients was conducted at a major tertiary teaching hospital. Patient’s medical records were examined to determine the rates of complementary medicine (CM) use and recording on medication charts and discharge prescriptions. Patient progress notes were audited to determine which health professionals were involved with the initiation or cessation of CMs during the inpatient stay. RESULTS: Three hundred and forty-one patients were included for analysis of which 44.3% (n = 151) participants were recorded as utilizing a CM. Patients were admitted on a mean of 2 (±1.4[Sd]; 0–9[range]) CMs and discharged on a mean of 1.7 CMs (±1.3[Sd]; 0–5[range]). 274 individual CMs were recorded on inpatient medication reconciliation forms with multivitamins, magnesium, fish oil and cholecalciferol recorded the most frequently. One hundred and fifty-eight changes to patient CM usage were recorded during the patient hospitalisation. One hundred and seven of these changes (68%) were not accounted for in the patient progress notes. CONCLUSION: Patients use of CM in this hospital setting do not reflect the national estimated usage. On the occasions that CM products are included in patient records, they are subsequently deprescribed following patient examination in hospital. It is currently unclear which health professionals have a role in this deprescribing process.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6925895
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69258952019-12-30 Complementary medicine use among Australian patients in an acute hospital setting: an exploratory, cross sectional study Waddington, Freya Lee, Jenny Naunton, Mark Kyle, Greg Thomas, Jackson O’Kane, Gabrielle BMC Complement Altern Med Research Article BACKGROUND: The use of Complementary Medicines (CMs) has significantly increased in Australia over the last decade. This study attempts to determine the extent to which complementary and alternative medicines are recorded, ceased or initiated in the acute hospital setting and investigate which health professionals have a role in this process. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of inpatients was conducted at a major tertiary teaching hospital. Patient’s medical records were examined to determine the rates of complementary medicine (CM) use and recording on medication charts and discharge prescriptions. Patient progress notes were audited to determine which health professionals were involved with the initiation or cessation of CMs during the inpatient stay. RESULTS: Three hundred and forty-one patients were included for analysis of which 44.3% (n = 151) participants were recorded as utilizing a CM. Patients were admitted on a mean of 2 (±1.4[Sd]; 0–9[range]) CMs and discharged on a mean of 1.7 CMs (±1.3[Sd]; 0–5[range]). 274 individual CMs were recorded on inpatient medication reconciliation forms with multivitamins, magnesium, fish oil and cholecalciferol recorded the most frequently. One hundred and fifty-eight changes to patient CM usage were recorded during the patient hospitalisation. One hundred and seven of these changes (68%) were not accounted for in the patient progress notes. CONCLUSION: Patients use of CM in this hospital setting do not reflect the national estimated usage. On the occasions that CM products are included in patient records, they are subsequently deprescribed following patient examination in hospital. It is currently unclear which health professionals have a role in this deprescribing process. BioMed Central 2019-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6925895/ /pubmed/31864327 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12906-019-2788-x Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Waddington, Freya
Lee, Jenny
Naunton, Mark
Kyle, Greg
Thomas, Jackson
O’Kane, Gabrielle
Complementary medicine use among Australian patients in an acute hospital setting: an exploratory, cross sectional study
title Complementary medicine use among Australian patients in an acute hospital setting: an exploratory, cross sectional study
title_full Complementary medicine use among Australian patients in an acute hospital setting: an exploratory, cross sectional study
title_fullStr Complementary medicine use among Australian patients in an acute hospital setting: an exploratory, cross sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Complementary medicine use among Australian patients in an acute hospital setting: an exploratory, cross sectional study
title_short Complementary medicine use among Australian patients in an acute hospital setting: an exploratory, cross sectional study
title_sort complementary medicine use among australian patients in an acute hospital setting: an exploratory, cross sectional study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6925895/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31864327
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12906-019-2788-x
work_keys_str_mv AT waddingtonfreya complementarymedicineuseamongaustralianpatientsinanacutehospitalsettinganexploratorycrosssectionalstudy
AT leejenny complementarymedicineuseamongaustralianpatientsinanacutehospitalsettinganexploratorycrosssectionalstudy
AT nauntonmark complementarymedicineuseamongaustralianpatientsinanacutehospitalsettinganexploratorycrosssectionalstudy
AT kylegreg complementarymedicineuseamongaustralianpatientsinanacutehospitalsettinganexploratorycrosssectionalstudy
AT thomasjackson complementarymedicineuseamongaustralianpatientsinanacutehospitalsettinganexploratorycrosssectionalstudy
AT okanegabrielle complementarymedicineuseamongaustralianpatientsinanacutehospitalsettinganexploratorycrosssectionalstudy