Cargando…
How one small text change in a study document can impact recruitment rates and follow-up completions
BACKGROUND: The validity and reliability of longitudinal research is highly dependent on the recruitment and retention of representative samples. Various strategies have been developed and tested for improving recruitment and follow-up rates into health-behavioural research, but few have examined th...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6926325/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31890631 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2019.100284 |
_version_ | 1783482072565809152 |
---|---|
author | Godinho, Alexandra Schell, Christina Cunningham, John A. |
author_facet | Godinho, Alexandra Schell, Christina Cunningham, John A. |
author_sort | Godinho, Alexandra |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The validity and reliability of longitudinal research is highly dependent on the recruitment and retention of representative samples. Various strategies have been developed and tested for improving recruitment and follow-up rates into health-behavioural research, but few have examined the role of linguistic choices and study document readability on participation rates. This study examined the impact of one small text change, assigning an inappropriate or grade-8 reading level password for intervention access, on participation rates and attrition in an online alcohol intervention trial. METHODS: Participants were recruited into an online alcohol intervention study using Amazon's Mechanical Turk via a multi-step recruitment process which required participants to log into a study portal using a pre-assigned password. Passwords were qualitatively coded as grade-8 and/or inappropriate for use within a professional setting. Separate logistic regressions examined which demographic, clinical characteristics, and password categorizations were most strongly associated with recruitment rates and follow-up completions. RESULTS: Inappropriate passwords were a barrier for recruitment among participants with post-secondary education as compared to those with less education (p = 0.044), while grade-8 passwords appeared to significantly facilitate the completion of 6-month follow-ups (p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Altogether, these findings suggest that some linguistic choices may play an important role in recruitment, while others, such as readability, may have longer-term effects on follow-up rates and attrition. Possible explanations for the findings, as well as, sample selection biases during recruitment and follow-up are discussed. Limitations of the study are stated and recommendations for researchers are provided. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02977026. Registered 27 Nov 2016. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6926325 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69263252019-12-30 How one small text change in a study document can impact recruitment rates and follow-up completions Godinho, Alexandra Schell, Christina Cunningham, John A. Internet Interv ISRII meeting 2019 special issue: Guest edited by Gerhard Anderson, Sonja March and Mathijs Lucassen BACKGROUND: The validity and reliability of longitudinal research is highly dependent on the recruitment and retention of representative samples. Various strategies have been developed and tested for improving recruitment and follow-up rates into health-behavioural research, but few have examined the role of linguistic choices and study document readability on participation rates. This study examined the impact of one small text change, assigning an inappropriate or grade-8 reading level password for intervention access, on participation rates and attrition in an online alcohol intervention trial. METHODS: Participants were recruited into an online alcohol intervention study using Amazon's Mechanical Turk via a multi-step recruitment process which required participants to log into a study portal using a pre-assigned password. Passwords were qualitatively coded as grade-8 and/or inappropriate for use within a professional setting. Separate logistic regressions examined which demographic, clinical characteristics, and password categorizations were most strongly associated with recruitment rates and follow-up completions. RESULTS: Inappropriate passwords were a barrier for recruitment among participants with post-secondary education as compared to those with less education (p = 0.044), while grade-8 passwords appeared to significantly facilitate the completion of 6-month follow-ups (p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Altogether, these findings suggest that some linguistic choices may play an important role in recruitment, while others, such as readability, may have longer-term effects on follow-up rates and attrition. Possible explanations for the findings, as well as, sample selection biases during recruitment and follow-up are discussed. Limitations of the study are stated and recommendations for researchers are provided. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02977026. Registered 27 Nov 2016. Elsevier 2019-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6926325/ /pubmed/31890631 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2019.100284 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | ISRII meeting 2019 special issue: Guest edited by Gerhard Anderson, Sonja March and Mathijs Lucassen Godinho, Alexandra Schell, Christina Cunningham, John A. How one small text change in a study document can impact recruitment rates and follow-up completions |
title | How one small text change in a study document can impact recruitment rates and follow-up completions |
title_full | How one small text change in a study document can impact recruitment rates and follow-up completions |
title_fullStr | How one small text change in a study document can impact recruitment rates and follow-up completions |
title_full_unstemmed | How one small text change in a study document can impact recruitment rates and follow-up completions |
title_short | How one small text change in a study document can impact recruitment rates and follow-up completions |
title_sort | how one small text change in a study document can impact recruitment rates and follow-up completions |
topic | ISRII meeting 2019 special issue: Guest edited by Gerhard Anderson, Sonja March and Mathijs Lucassen |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6926325/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31890631 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2019.100284 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT godinhoalexandra howonesmalltextchangeinastudydocumentcanimpactrecruitmentratesandfollowupcompletions AT schellchristina howonesmalltextchangeinastudydocumentcanimpactrecruitmentratesandfollowupcompletions AT cunninghamjohna howonesmalltextchangeinastudydocumentcanimpactrecruitmentratesandfollowupcompletions |