Cargando…

Efficacy of online Memory Specificity Training in adults with a history of depression, using a multiple baseline across participants design

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Memory Specificity Training (MeST), a group training protocol, is effective in improving autobiographical memory specificity (AMS), and in so doing, reducing emotional disorder symptoms amongst clinical groups. We examined MeST's effectiveness when the core component...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martens, Kris, Barry, Tom J., Takano, Keisuke, Onghena, Patrick, Raes, Filip
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6926331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31890612
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2019.100259
_version_ 1783482073983483904
author Martens, Kris
Barry, Tom J.
Takano, Keisuke
Onghena, Patrick
Raes, Filip
author_facet Martens, Kris
Barry, Tom J.
Takano, Keisuke
Onghena, Patrick
Raes, Filip
author_sort Martens, Kris
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Memory Specificity Training (MeST), a group training protocol, is effective in improving autobiographical memory specificity (AMS), and in so doing, reducing emotional disorder symptoms amongst clinical groups. We examined MeST's effectiveness when the core component (memory specificity trials) is offered online and individually (c-MeST). METHODS: A multiple-baseline across-participants design with a randomization-to-baseline length (14 to 33 days) was used. Participants were twenty adults (16 female; M(age) = 50, SD = 12) experiencing reduced AMS, at least one lifetime depressive episode and who currently reported at least minimal depressive symptoms. During baseline, the training phase (nine sessions across 17 days) and a three-month follow-up assessment, AMS, depressive symptoms and related processes were measured. RESULTS: AMS improved significantly by three months follow-up. Session-to-session scores indicated that AMS improved most from baseline to the first online session, with no further improvement thereafter. In contrast to studies with clinical participants, no significant change in symptoms or secondary processes such as rumination was found. CONCLUSIONS: Translating MeST into an online, individual version is a feasible, low-cost intervention for reduced AMS. Future research should examine c-MeST's potential for preventing increases in symptoms in at-risk samples with longer follow-ups as well as its potential for reducing symptoms in clinical groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6926331
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69263312019-12-30 Efficacy of online Memory Specificity Training in adults with a history of depression, using a multiple baseline across participants design Martens, Kris Barry, Tom J. Takano, Keisuke Onghena, Patrick Raes, Filip Internet Interv ISRII meeting 2019 special issue: Guest edited by Gerhard Anderson, Sonja March and Mathijs Lucassen BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Memory Specificity Training (MeST), a group training protocol, is effective in improving autobiographical memory specificity (AMS), and in so doing, reducing emotional disorder symptoms amongst clinical groups. We examined MeST's effectiveness when the core component (memory specificity trials) is offered online and individually (c-MeST). METHODS: A multiple-baseline across-participants design with a randomization-to-baseline length (14 to 33 days) was used. Participants were twenty adults (16 female; M(age) = 50, SD = 12) experiencing reduced AMS, at least one lifetime depressive episode and who currently reported at least minimal depressive symptoms. During baseline, the training phase (nine sessions across 17 days) and a three-month follow-up assessment, AMS, depressive symptoms and related processes were measured. RESULTS: AMS improved significantly by three months follow-up. Session-to-session scores indicated that AMS improved most from baseline to the first online session, with no further improvement thereafter. In contrast to studies with clinical participants, no significant change in symptoms or secondary processes such as rumination was found. CONCLUSIONS: Translating MeST into an online, individual version is a feasible, low-cost intervention for reduced AMS. Future research should examine c-MeST's potential for preventing increases in symptoms in at-risk samples with longer follow-ups as well as its potential for reducing symptoms in clinical groups. Elsevier 2019-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6926331/ /pubmed/31890612 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2019.100259 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle ISRII meeting 2019 special issue: Guest edited by Gerhard Anderson, Sonja March and Mathijs Lucassen
Martens, Kris
Barry, Tom J.
Takano, Keisuke
Onghena, Patrick
Raes, Filip
Efficacy of online Memory Specificity Training in adults with a history of depression, using a multiple baseline across participants design
title Efficacy of online Memory Specificity Training in adults with a history of depression, using a multiple baseline across participants design
title_full Efficacy of online Memory Specificity Training in adults with a history of depression, using a multiple baseline across participants design
title_fullStr Efficacy of online Memory Specificity Training in adults with a history of depression, using a multiple baseline across participants design
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of online Memory Specificity Training in adults with a history of depression, using a multiple baseline across participants design
title_short Efficacy of online Memory Specificity Training in adults with a history of depression, using a multiple baseline across participants design
title_sort efficacy of online memory specificity training in adults with a history of depression, using a multiple baseline across participants design
topic ISRII meeting 2019 special issue: Guest edited by Gerhard Anderson, Sonja March and Mathijs Lucassen
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6926331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31890612
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2019.100259
work_keys_str_mv AT martenskris efficacyofonlinememoryspecificitytraininginadultswithahistoryofdepressionusingamultiplebaselineacrossparticipantsdesign
AT barrytomj efficacyofonlinememoryspecificitytraininginadultswithahistoryofdepressionusingamultiplebaselineacrossparticipantsdesign
AT takanokeisuke efficacyofonlinememoryspecificitytraininginadultswithahistoryofdepressionusingamultiplebaselineacrossparticipantsdesign
AT onghenapatrick efficacyofonlinememoryspecificitytraininginadultswithahistoryofdepressionusingamultiplebaselineacrossparticipantsdesign
AT raesfilip efficacyofonlinememoryspecificitytraininginadultswithahistoryofdepressionusingamultiplebaselineacrossparticipantsdesign