Cargando…
Efficacy of online Memory Specificity Training in adults with a history of depression, using a multiple baseline across participants design
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Memory Specificity Training (MeST), a group training protocol, is effective in improving autobiographical memory specificity (AMS), and in so doing, reducing emotional disorder symptoms amongst clinical groups. We examined MeST's effectiveness when the core component...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6926331/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31890612 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2019.100259 |
_version_ | 1783482073983483904 |
---|---|
author | Martens, Kris Barry, Tom J. Takano, Keisuke Onghena, Patrick Raes, Filip |
author_facet | Martens, Kris Barry, Tom J. Takano, Keisuke Onghena, Patrick Raes, Filip |
author_sort | Martens, Kris |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Memory Specificity Training (MeST), a group training protocol, is effective in improving autobiographical memory specificity (AMS), and in so doing, reducing emotional disorder symptoms amongst clinical groups. We examined MeST's effectiveness when the core component (memory specificity trials) is offered online and individually (c-MeST). METHODS: A multiple-baseline across-participants design with a randomization-to-baseline length (14 to 33 days) was used. Participants were twenty adults (16 female; M(age) = 50, SD = 12) experiencing reduced AMS, at least one lifetime depressive episode and who currently reported at least minimal depressive symptoms. During baseline, the training phase (nine sessions across 17 days) and a three-month follow-up assessment, AMS, depressive symptoms and related processes were measured. RESULTS: AMS improved significantly by three months follow-up. Session-to-session scores indicated that AMS improved most from baseline to the first online session, with no further improvement thereafter. In contrast to studies with clinical participants, no significant change in symptoms or secondary processes such as rumination was found. CONCLUSIONS: Translating MeST into an online, individual version is a feasible, low-cost intervention for reduced AMS. Future research should examine c-MeST's potential for preventing increases in symptoms in at-risk samples with longer follow-ups as well as its potential for reducing symptoms in clinical groups. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6926331 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69263312019-12-30 Efficacy of online Memory Specificity Training in adults with a history of depression, using a multiple baseline across participants design Martens, Kris Barry, Tom J. Takano, Keisuke Onghena, Patrick Raes, Filip Internet Interv ISRII meeting 2019 special issue: Guest edited by Gerhard Anderson, Sonja March and Mathijs Lucassen BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Memory Specificity Training (MeST), a group training protocol, is effective in improving autobiographical memory specificity (AMS), and in so doing, reducing emotional disorder symptoms amongst clinical groups. We examined MeST's effectiveness when the core component (memory specificity trials) is offered online and individually (c-MeST). METHODS: A multiple-baseline across-participants design with a randomization-to-baseline length (14 to 33 days) was used. Participants were twenty adults (16 female; M(age) = 50, SD = 12) experiencing reduced AMS, at least one lifetime depressive episode and who currently reported at least minimal depressive symptoms. During baseline, the training phase (nine sessions across 17 days) and a three-month follow-up assessment, AMS, depressive symptoms and related processes were measured. RESULTS: AMS improved significantly by three months follow-up. Session-to-session scores indicated that AMS improved most from baseline to the first online session, with no further improvement thereafter. In contrast to studies with clinical participants, no significant change in symptoms or secondary processes such as rumination was found. CONCLUSIONS: Translating MeST into an online, individual version is a feasible, low-cost intervention for reduced AMS. Future research should examine c-MeST's potential for preventing increases in symptoms in at-risk samples with longer follow-ups as well as its potential for reducing symptoms in clinical groups. Elsevier 2019-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6926331/ /pubmed/31890612 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2019.100259 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | ISRII meeting 2019 special issue: Guest edited by Gerhard Anderson, Sonja March and Mathijs Lucassen Martens, Kris Barry, Tom J. Takano, Keisuke Onghena, Patrick Raes, Filip Efficacy of online Memory Specificity Training in adults with a history of depression, using a multiple baseline across participants design |
title | Efficacy of online Memory Specificity Training in adults with a history of depression, using a multiple baseline across participants design |
title_full | Efficacy of online Memory Specificity Training in adults with a history of depression, using a multiple baseline across participants design |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of online Memory Specificity Training in adults with a history of depression, using a multiple baseline across participants design |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of online Memory Specificity Training in adults with a history of depression, using a multiple baseline across participants design |
title_short | Efficacy of online Memory Specificity Training in adults with a history of depression, using a multiple baseline across participants design |
title_sort | efficacy of online memory specificity training in adults with a history of depression, using a multiple baseline across participants design |
topic | ISRII meeting 2019 special issue: Guest edited by Gerhard Anderson, Sonja March and Mathijs Lucassen |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6926331/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31890612 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2019.100259 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT martenskris efficacyofonlinememoryspecificitytraininginadultswithahistoryofdepressionusingamultiplebaselineacrossparticipantsdesign AT barrytomj efficacyofonlinememoryspecificitytraininginadultswithahistoryofdepressionusingamultiplebaselineacrossparticipantsdesign AT takanokeisuke efficacyofonlinememoryspecificitytraininginadultswithahistoryofdepressionusingamultiplebaselineacrossparticipantsdesign AT onghenapatrick efficacyofonlinememoryspecificitytraininginadultswithahistoryofdepressionusingamultiplebaselineacrossparticipantsdesign AT raesfilip efficacyofonlinememoryspecificitytraininginadultswithahistoryofdepressionusingamultiplebaselineacrossparticipantsdesign |