Cargando…

Sex differences in heart rate responses to postural provocations

Sex differences are known in several facets of cardiac electrophysiology, mostly concerning myocardial repolarisation. In this study, heart rate and heart rate variability (HRV) responses to postural provocations were compared in 175 and 176 healthy females and males, respectively (aged 33.1 ± 9.1 y...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hnatkova, Katerina, Šišáková, Martina, Smetana, Peter, Toman, Ondřej, Huster, Katharina M., Novotný, Tomáš, Schmidt, Georg, Malik, Marek
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6926477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31611089
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.09.044
_version_ 1783482098879823872
author Hnatkova, Katerina
Šišáková, Martina
Smetana, Peter
Toman, Ondřej
Huster, Katharina M.
Novotný, Tomáš
Schmidt, Georg
Malik, Marek
author_facet Hnatkova, Katerina
Šišáková, Martina
Smetana, Peter
Toman, Ondřej
Huster, Katharina M.
Novotný, Tomáš
Schmidt, Georg
Malik, Marek
author_sort Hnatkova, Katerina
collection PubMed
description Sex differences are known in several facets of cardiac electrophysiology, mostly concerning myocardial repolarisation. In this study, heart rate and heart rate variability (HRV) responses to postural provocations were compared in 175 and 176 healthy females and males, respectively (aged 33.1 ± 9.1 years). Two different postural provocative tests with position changes supine→sitting→standing→supine and supine→standing→sitting→supine (15-min standing, 10-min other positions) were performed up to 4 times in each subject. Heart rate and heart rate variability spectral indices were measured in 5-min windows before positional changes. At supine position, females had averaged heart rate approximately 5 beats per minute (bpm) faster than males and this sex difference was practically constant during the postural changes. In both sexes, change supine→sitting and supine→standing increased heart rate by approximately 10 and 30 bpm, respectively, with no statistical differences between the sex groups. At supine baseline, females had normalised high frequency components (nHF) of HRV approximately 7% larger compared to males (p < 0.001). While the same difference in nHF was found at sitting, the change to standing position lead to significantly larger nHF reduction in females compared to males (mean changes 22.5 vs 17.2%, p < 0.001). This shows that despite similar heart rate increase, females respond to standing by more substantial shifts in cardiac sympatho-vagal modulations. This makes it plausible to speculate that the differences in autonomic reactions to stress contribute to the known sex-differences in psychosocial responses to stressful situations and to the known difference in susceptibility to ventricular fibrillation between females and males.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6926477
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69264772019-12-30 Sex differences in heart rate responses to postural provocations Hnatkova, Katerina Šišáková, Martina Smetana, Peter Toman, Ondřej Huster, Katharina M. Novotný, Tomáš Schmidt, Georg Malik, Marek Int J Cardiol Article Sex differences are known in several facets of cardiac electrophysiology, mostly concerning myocardial repolarisation. In this study, heart rate and heart rate variability (HRV) responses to postural provocations were compared in 175 and 176 healthy females and males, respectively (aged 33.1 ± 9.1 years). Two different postural provocative tests with position changes supine→sitting→standing→supine and supine→standing→sitting→supine (15-min standing, 10-min other positions) were performed up to 4 times in each subject. Heart rate and heart rate variability spectral indices were measured in 5-min windows before positional changes. At supine position, females had averaged heart rate approximately 5 beats per minute (bpm) faster than males and this sex difference was practically constant during the postural changes. In both sexes, change supine→sitting and supine→standing increased heart rate by approximately 10 and 30 bpm, respectively, with no statistical differences between the sex groups. At supine baseline, females had normalised high frequency components (nHF) of HRV approximately 7% larger compared to males (p < 0.001). While the same difference in nHF was found at sitting, the change to standing position lead to significantly larger nHF reduction in females compared to males (mean changes 22.5 vs 17.2%, p < 0.001). This shows that despite similar heart rate increase, females respond to standing by more substantial shifts in cardiac sympatho-vagal modulations. This makes it plausible to speculate that the differences in autonomic reactions to stress contribute to the known sex-differences in psychosocial responses to stressful situations and to the known difference in susceptibility to ventricular fibrillation between females and males. Elsevier 2019-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6926477/ /pubmed/31611089 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.09.044 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Hnatkova, Katerina
Šišáková, Martina
Smetana, Peter
Toman, Ondřej
Huster, Katharina M.
Novotný, Tomáš
Schmidt, Georg
Malik, Marek
Sex differences in heart rate responses to postural provocations
title Sex differences in heart rate responses to postural provocations
title_full Sex differences in heart rate responses to postural provocations
title_fullStr Sex differences in heart rate responses to postural provocations
title_full_unstemmed Sex differences in heart rate responses to postural provocations
title_short Sex differences in heart rate responses to postural provocations
title_sort sex differences in heart rate responses to postural provocations
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6926477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31611089
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.09.044
work_keys_str_mv AT hnatkovakaterina sexdifferencesinheartrateresponsestoposturalprovocations
AT sisakovamartina sexdifferencesinheartrateresponsestoposturalprovocations
AT smetanapeter sexdifferencesinheartrateresponsestoposturalprovocations
AT tomanondrej sexdifferencesinheartrateresponsestoposturalprovocations
AT husterkatharinam sexdifferencesinheartrateresponsestoposturalprovocations
AT novotnytomas sexdifferencesinheartrateresponsestoposturalprovocations
AT schmidtgeorg sexdifferencesinheartrateresponsestoposturalprovocations
AT malikmarek sexdifferencesinheartrateresponsestoposturalprovocations