Cargando…
Sex differences in heart rate responses to postural provocations
Sex differences are known in several facets of cardiac electrophysiology, mostly concerning myocardial repolarisation. In this study, heart rate and heart rate variability (HRV) responses to postural provocations were compared in 175 and 176 healthy females and males, respectively (aged 33.1 ± 9.1 y...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6926477/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31611089 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.09.044 |
_version_ | 1783482098879823872 |
---|---|
author | Hnatkova, Katerina Šišáková, Martina Smetana, Peter Toman, Ondřej Huster, Katharina M. Novotný, Tomáš Schmidt, Georg Malik, Marek |
author_facet | Hnatkova, Katerina Šišáková, Martina Smetana, Peter Toman, Ondřej Huster, Katharina M. Novotný, Tomáš Schmidt, Georg Malik, Marek |
author_sort | Hnatkova, Katerina |
collection | PubMed |
description | Sex differences are known in several facets of cardiac electrophysiology, mostly concerning myocardial repolarisation. In this study, heart rate and heart rate variability (HRV) responses to postural provocations were compared in 175 and 176 healthy females and males, respectively (aged 33.1 ± 9.1 years). Two different postural provocative tests with position changes supine→sitting→standing→supine and supine→standing→sitting→supine (15-min standing, 10-min other positions) were performed up to 4 times in each subject. Heart rate and heart rate variability spectral indices were measured in 5-min windows before positional changes. At supine position, females had averaged heart rate approximately 5 beats per minute (bpm) faster than males and this sex difference was practically constant during the postural changes. In both sexes, change supine→sitting and supine→standing increased heart rate by approximately 10 and 30 bpm, respectively, with no statistical differences between the sex groups. At supine baseline, females had normalised high frequency components (nHF) of HRV approximately 7% larger compared to males (p < 0.001). While the same difference in nHF was found at sitting, the change to standing position lead to significantly larger nHF reduction in females compared to males (mean changes 22.5 vs 17.2%, p < 0.001). This shows that despite similar heart rate increase, females respond to standing by more substantial shifts in cardiac sympatho-vagal modulations. This makes it plausible to speculate that the differences in autonomic reactions to stress contribute to the known sex-differences in psychosocial responses to stressful situations and to the known difference in susceptibility to ventricular fibrillation between females and males. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6926477 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69264772019-12-30 Sex differences in heart rate responses to postural provocations Hnatkova, Katerina Šišáková, Martina Smetana, Peter Toman, Ondřej Huster, Katharina M. Novotný, Tomáš Schmidt, Georg Malik, Marek Int J Cardiol Article Sex differences are known in several facets of cardiac electrophysiology, mostly concerning myocardial repolarisation. In this study, heart rate and heart rate variability (HRV) responses to postural provocations were compared in 175 and 176 healthy females and males, respectively (aged 33.1 ± 9.1 years). Two different postural provocative tests with position changes supine→sitting→standing→supine and supine→standing→sitting→supine (15-min standing, 10-min other positions) were performed up to 4 times in each subject. Heart rate and heart rate variability spectral indices were measured in 5-min windows before positional changes. At supine position, females had averaged heart rate approximately 5 beats per minute (bpm) faster than males and this sex difference was practically constant during the postural changes. In both sexes, change supine→sitting and supine→standing increased heart rate by approximately 10 and 30 bpm, respectively, with no statistical differences between the sex groups. At supine baseline, females had normalised high frequency components (nHF) of HRV approximately 7% larger compared to males (p < 0.001). While the same difference in nHF was found at sitting, the change to standing position lead to significantly larger nHF reduction in females compared to males (mean changes 22.5 vs 17.2%, p < 0.001). This shows that despite similar heart rate increase, females respond to standing by more substantial shifts in cardiac sympatho-vagal modulations. This makes it plausible to speculate that the differences in autonomic reactions to stress contribute to the known sex-differences in psychosocial responses to stressful situations and to the known difference in susceptibility to ventricular fibrillation between females and males. Elsevier 2019-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6926477/ /pubmed/31611089 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.09.044 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Hnatkova, Katerina Šišáková, Martina Smetana, Peter Toman, Ondřej Huster, Katharina M. Novotný, Tomáš Schmidt, Georg Malik, Marek Sex differences in heart rate responses to postural provocations |
title | Sex differences in heart rate responses to postural provocations |
title_full | Sex differences in heart rate responses to postural provocations |
title_fullStr | Sex differences in heart rate responses to postural provocations |
title_full_unstemmed | Sex differences in heart rate responses to postural provocations |
title_short | Sex differences in heart rate responses to postural provocations |
title_sort | sex differences in heart rate responses to postural provocations |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6926477/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31611089 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.09.044 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hnatkovakaterina sexdifferencesinheartrateresponsestoposturalprovocations AT sisakovamartina sexdifferencesinheartrateresponsestoposturalprovocations AT smetanapeter sexdifferencesinheartrateresponsestoposturalprovocations AT tomanondrej sexdifferencesinheartrateresponsestoposturalprovocations AT husterkatharinam sexdifferencesinheartrateresponsestoposturalprovocations AT novotnytomas sexdifferencesinheartrateresponsestoposturalprovocations AT schmidtgeorg sexdifferencesinheartrateresponsestoposturalprovocations AT malikmarek sexdifferencesinheartrateresponsestoposturalprovocations |