Cargando…

The SED-GIH: A Single-Item Question for Assessment of Stationary Behavior—A Study of Concurrent and Convergent Validity

The unfavorable health consequences of prolonged time spent sedentary (stationary) make accurate assessment in the general population important. However, for many existing questionnaires, validity for identifying stationary time has not been shown or has shown low validity. This study aimed to asses...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kallings, Lena V., Olsson, Sven J. G., Ekblom, Örjan, Ekblom-Bak, Elin, Börjesson, Mats
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6926785/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31795109
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16234766
_version_ 1783482170939015168
author Kallings, Lena V.
Olsson, Sven J. G.
Ekblom, Örjan
Ekblom-Bak, Elin
Börjesson, Mats
author_facet Kallings, Lena V.
Olsson, Sven J. G.
Ekblom, Örjan
Ekblom-Bak, Elin
Börjesson, Mats
author_sort Kallings, Lena V.
collection PubMed
description The unfavorable health consequences of prolonged time spent sedentary (stationary) make accurate assessment in the general population important. However, for many existing questionnaires, validity for identifying stationary time has not been shown or has shown low validity. This study aimed to assess the concurrent and convergent validity of the GIH stationary single-item question (SED-GIH). Data were obtained in 2013 and 2014 from two Swedish cohorts. A total of 711 men and women provided valid accelerometer data (Actigraph GT3X+) and were included for concurrent validity analyses. A total of 560 individuals answered three additional commonly used sedentary questions, and were included for convergent validity analysis. The SED-GIH displayed a significant correlation with total stationary time (r(s) = 0.48) and time in prolonged stationary time (r(s) = 0.44). The ROC analysis showed an AUC of 0.72 for identifying individuals with stationary time over 600 min/day. The SED-GIH correlated significantly with other previously used questions (r = 0.72–0.89). The SED-GIH single-item question showed a relatively high agreement with device-assessed stationary behavior and was able to identify individuals with high levels of stationary time. Thus, the SED-GIH may be used to assess total and prolonged stationary time. This has important implications, as simple assessment tools of this behavior are needed in public health practice and research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6926785
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69267852019-12-24 The SED-GIH: A Single-Item Question for Assessment of Stationary Behavior—A Study of Concurrent and Convergent Validity Kallings, Lena V. Olsson, Sven J. G. Ekblom, Örjan Ekblom-Bak, Elin Börjesson, Mats Int J Environ Res Public Health Article The unfavorable health consequences of prolonged time spent sedentary (stationary) make accurate assessment in the general population important. However, for many existing questionnaires, validity for identifying stationary time has not been shown or has shown low validity. This study aimed to assess the concurrent and convergent validity of the GIH stationary single-item question (SED-GIH). Data were obtained in 2013 and 2014 from two Swedish cohorts. A total of 711 men and women provided valid accelerometer data (Actigraph GT3X+) and were included for concurrent validity analyses. A total of 560 individuals answered three additional commonly used sedentary questions, and were included for convergent validity analysis. The SED-GIH displayed a significant correlation with total stationary time (r(s) = 0.48) and time in prolonged stationary time (r(s) = 0.44). The ROC analysis showed an AUC of 0.72 for identifying individuals with stationary time over 600 min/day. The SED-GIH correlated significantly with other previously used questions (r = 0.72–0.89). The SED-GIH single-item question showed a relatively high agreement with device-assessed stationary behavior and was able to identify individuals with high levels of stationary time. Thus, the SED-GIH may be used to assess total and prolonged stationary time. This has important implications, as simple assessment tools of this behavior are needed in public health practice and research. MDPI 2019-11-28 2019-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6926785/ /pubmed/31795109 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16234766 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kallings, Lena V.
Olsson, Sven J. G.
Ekblom, Örjan
Ekblom-Bak, Elin
Börjesson, Mats
The SED-GIH: A Single-Item Question for Assessment of Stationary Behavior—A Study of Concurrent and Convergent Validity
title The SED-GIH: A Single-Item Question for Assessment of Stationary Behavior—A Study of Concurrent and Convergent Validity
title_full The SED-GIH: A Single-Item Question for Assessment of Stationary Behavior—A Study of Concurrent and Convergent Validity
title_fullStr The SED-GIH: A Single-Item Question for Assessment of Stationary Behavior—A Study of Concurrent and Convergent Validity
title_full_unstemmed The SED-GIH: A Single-Item Question for Assessment of Stationary Behavior—A Study of Concurrent and Convergent Validity
title_short The SED-GIH: A Single-Item Question for Assessment of Stationary Behavior—A Study of Concurrent and Convergent Validity
title_sort sed-gih: a single-item question for assessment of stationary behavior—a study of concurrent and convergent validity
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6926785/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31795109
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16234766
work_keys_str_mv AT kallingslenav thesedgihasingleitemquestionforassessmentofstationarybehaviorastudyofconcurrentandconvergentvalidity
AT olssonsvenjg thesedgihasingleitemquestionforassessmentofstationarybehaviorastudyofconcurrentandconvergentvalidity
AT ekblomorjan thesedgihasingleitemquestionforassessmentofstationarybehaviorastudyofconcurrentandconvergentvalidity
AT ekblombakelin thesedgihasingleitemquestionforassessmentofstationarybehaviorastudyofconcurrentandconvergentvalidity
AT borjessonmats thesedgihasingleitemquestionforassessmentofstationarybehaviorastudyofconcurrentandconvergentvalidity
AT kallingslenav sedgihasingleitemquestionforassessmentofstationarybehaviorastudyofconcurrentandconvergentvalidity
AT olssonsvenjg sedgihasingleitemquestionforassessmentofstationarybehaviorastudyofconcurrentandconvergentvalidity
AT ekblomorjan sedgihasingleitemquestionforassessmentofstationarybehaviorastudyofconcurrentandconvergentvalidity
AT ekblombakelin sedgihasingleitemquestionforassessmentofstationarybehaviorastudyofconcurrentandconvergentvalidity
AT borjessonmats sedgihasingleitemquestionforassessmentofstationarybehaviorastudyofconcurrentandconvergentvalidity