Cargando…
The SED-GIH: A Single-Item Question for Assessment of Stationary Behavior—A Study of Concurrent and Convergent Validity
The unfavorable health consequences of prolonged time spent sedentary (stationary) make accurate assessment in the general population important. However, for many existing questionnaires, validity for identifying stationary time has not been shown or has shown low validity. This study aimed to asses...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6926785/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31795109 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16234766 |
_version_ | 1783482170939015168 |
---|---|
author | Kallings, Lena V. Olsson, Sven J. G. Ekblom, Örjan Ekblom-Bak, Elin Börjesson, Mats |
author_facet | Kallings, Lena V. Olsson, Sven J. G. Ekblom, Örjan Ekblom-Bak, Elin Börjesson, Mats |
author_sort | Kallings, Lena V. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The unfavorable health consequences of prolonged time spent sedentary (stationary) make accurate assessment in the general population important. However, for many existing questionnaires, validity for identifying stationary time has not been shown or has shown low validity. This study aimed to assess the concurrent and convergent validity of the GIH stationary single-item question (SED-GIH). Data were obtained in 2013 and 2014 from two Swedish cohorts. A total of 711 men and women provided valid accelerometer data (Actigraph GT3X+) and were included for concurrent validity analyses. A total of 560 individuals answered three additional commonly used sedentary questions, and were included for convergent validity analysis. The SED-GIH displayed a significant correlation with total stationary time (r(s) = 0.48) and time in prolonged stationary time (r(s) = 0.44). The ROC analysis showed an AUC of 0.72 for identifying individuals with stationary time over 600 min/day. The SED-GIH correlated significantly with other previously used questions (r = 0.72–0.89). The SED-GIH single-item question showed a relatively high agreement with device-assessed stationary behavior and was able to identify individuals with high levels of stationary time. Thus, the SED-GIH may be used to assess total and prolonged stationary time. This has important implications, as simple assessment tools of this behavior are needed in public health practice and research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6926785 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69267852019-12-24 The SED-GIH: A Single-Item Question for Assessment of Stationary Behavior—A Study of Concurrent and Convergent Validity Kallings, Lena V. Olsson, Sven J. G. Ekblom, Örjan Ekblom-Bak, Elin Börjesson, Mats Int J Environ Res Public Health Article The unfavorable health consequences of prolonged time spent sedentary (stationary) make accurate assessment in the general population important. However, for many existing questionnaires, validity for identifying stationary time has not been shown or has shown low validity. This study aimed to assess the concurrent and convergent validity of the GIH stationary single-item question (SED-GIH). Data were obtained in 2013 and 2014 from two Swedish cohorts. A total of 711 men and women provided valid accelerometer data (Actigraph GT3X+) and were included for concurrent validity analyses. A total of 560 individuals answered three additional commonly used sedentary questions, and were included for convergent validity analysis. The SED-GIH displayed a significant correlation with total stationary time (r(s) = 0.48) and time in prolonged stationary time (r(s) = 0.44). The ROC analysis showed an AUC of 0.72 for identifying individuals with stationary time over 600 min/day. The SED-GIH correlated significantly with other previously used questions (r = 0.72–0.89). The SED-GIH single-item question showed a relatively high agreement with device-assessed stationary behavior and was able to identify individuals with high levels of stationary time. Thus, the SED-GIH may be used to assess total and prolonged stationary time. This has important implications, as simple assessment tools of this behavior are needed in public health practice and research. MDPI 2019-11-28 2019-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6926785/ /pubmed/31795109 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16234766 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Kallings, Lena V. Olsson, Sven J. G. Ekblom, Örjan Ekblom-Bak, Elin Börjesson, Mats The SED-GIH: A Single-Item Question for Assessment of Stationary Behavior—A Study of Concurrent and Convergent Validity |
title | The SED-GIH: A Single-Item Question for Assessment of Stationary Behavior—A Study of Concurrent and Convergent Validity |
title_full | The SED-GIH: A Single-Item Question for Assessment of Stationary Behavior—A Study of Concurrent and Convergent Validity |
title_fullStr | The SED-GIH: A Single-Item Question for Assessment of Stationary Behavior—A Study of Concurrent and Convergent Validity |
title_full_unstemmed | The SED-GIH: A Single-Item Question for Assessment of Stationary Behavior—A Study of Concurrent and Convergent Validity |
title_short | The SED-GIH: A Single-Item Question for Assessment of Stationary Behavior—A Study of Concurrent and Convergent Validity |
title_sort | sed-gih: a single-item question for assessment of stationary behavior—a study of concurrent and convergent validity |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6926785/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31795109 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16234766 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kallingslenav thesedgihasingleitemquestionforassessmentofstationarybehaviorastudyofconcurrentandconvergentvalidity AT olssonsvenjg thesedgihasingleitemquestionforassessmentofstationarybehaviorastudyofconcurrentandconvergentvalidity AT ekblomorjan thesedgihasingleitemquestionforassessmentofstationarybehaviorastudyofconcurrentandconvergentvalidity AT ekblombakelin thesedgihasingleitemquestionforassessmentofstationarybehaviorastudyofconcurrentandconvergentvalidity AT borjessonmats thesedgihasingleitemquestionforassessmentofstationarybehaviorastudyofconcurrentandconvergentvalidity AT kallingslenav sedgihasingleitemquestionforassessmentofstationarybehaviorastudyofconcurrentandconvergentvalidity AT olssonsvenjg sedgihasingleitemquestionforassessmentofstationarybehaviorastudyofconcurrentandconvergentvalidity AT ekblomorjan sedgihasingleitemquestionforassessmentofstationarybehaviorastudyofconcurrentandconvergentvalidity AT ekblombakelin sedgihasingleitemquestionforassessmentofstationarybehaviorastudyofconcurrentandconvergentvalidity AT borjessonmats sedgihasingleitemquestionforassessmentofstationarybehaviorastudyofconcurrentandconvergentvalidity |