Cargando…

Exit and Entry Screening Practices for Infectious Diseases among Travelers at Points of Entry: Looking for Evidence on Public Health Impact

A scoping search and a systematic literature review were conducted to give an insight on entry and exit screening referring to travelers at points of entry, by analyzing published evidence on practices, guidelines, and experiences in the past 15 years worldwide. Grey literature, PubMed. and Scopus w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mouchtouri, Varvara A., Christoforidou, Eleni P., an der Heiden, Maria, Menel Lemos, Cinthia, Fanos, Margherita, Rexroth, Ute, Grote, Ulrike, Belfroid, Evelien, Swaan, Corien, Hadjichristodoulou, Christos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6926871/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31766548
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16234638
_version_ 1783482193101717504
author Mouchtouri, Varvara A.
Christoforidou, Eleni P.
an der Heiden, Maria
Menel Lemos, Cinthia
Fanos, Margherita
Rexroth, Ute
Grote, Ulrike
Belfroid, Evelien
Swaan, Corien
Hadjichristodoulou, Christos
author_facet Mouchtouri, Varvara A.
Christoforidou, Eleni P.
an der Heiden, Maria
Menel Lemos, Cinthia
Fanos, Margherita
Rexroth, Ute
Grote, Ulrike
Belfroid, Evelien
Swaan, Corien
Hadjichristodoulou, Christos
author_sort Mouchtouri, Varvara A.
collection PubMed
description A scoping search and a systematic literature review were conducted to give an insight on entry and exit screening referring to travelers at points of entry, by analyzing published evidence on practices, guidelines, and experiences in the past 15 years worldwide. Grey literature, PubMed. and Scopus were searched using specific terms. Most of the available data identified through the systematic literature review concerned entry screening measures at airports. Little evidence is available about entry and exit screening measure implementation and effectiveness at ports and ground crossings. Exit screening was part of the World Health Organisation’s (WHO) temporary recommendations for implementation in certain points of entry, for specific time periods. Exit screening measures for Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) in the three most affected West African countries did not identify any cases and showed zero sensitivity and very low specificity. The percentages of confirmed cases identified out of the total numbers of travelers that passed through entry screening measures in various countries worldwide for Influenza Pandemic (H1N1) and EVD in West Africa were zero or extremely low. Entry screening measures for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) did not detect any confirmed SARS cases in Australia, Canada, and Singapore. Despite the ineffectiveness of entry and exit screening measures, authors reported several important concomitant positive effects that their impact is difficult to assess, including discouraging travel of ill persons, raising awareness, and educating the traveling public and maintaining operation of flights from/to the affected areas. Exit screening measures in affected areas are important and should be applied jointly with other measures including information strategies, epidemiological investigation, contact tracing, vaccination, and quarantine to achieve a comprehensive outbreak management response. Based on review results, an algorithm about decision-making for entry/exit screening was developed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6926871
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69268712019-12-23 Exit and Entry Screening Practices for Infectious Diseases among Travelers at Points of Entry: Looking for Evidence on Public Health Impact Mouchtouri, Varvara A. Christoforidou, Eleni P. an der Heiden, Maria Menel Lemos, Cinthia Fanos, Margherita Rexroth, Ute Grote, Ulrike Belfroid, Evelien Swaan, Corien Hadjichristodoulou, Christos Int J Environ Res Public Health Review A scoping search and a systematic literature review were conducted to give an insight on entry and exit screening referring to travelers at points of entry, by analyzing published evidence on practices, guidelines, and experiences in the past 15 years worldwide. Grey literature, PubMed. and Scopus were searched using specific terms. Most of the available data identified through the systematic literature review concerned entry screening measures at airports. Little evidence is available about entry and exit screening measure implementation and effectiveness at ports and ground crossings. Exit screening was part of the World Health Organisation’s (WHO) temporary recommendations for implementation in certain points of entry, for specific time periods. Exit screening measures for Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) in the three most affected West African countries did not identify any cases and showed zero sensitivity and very low specificity. The percentages of confirmed cases identified out of the total numbers of travelers that passed through entry screening measures in various countries worldwide for Influenza Pandemic (H1N1) and EVD in West Africa were zero or extremely low. Entry screening measures for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) did not detect any confirmed SARS cases in Australia, Canada, and Singapore. Despite the ineffectiveness of entry and exit screening measures, authors reported several important concomitant positive effects that their impact is difficult to assess, including discouraging travel of ill persons, raising awareness, and educating the traveling public and maintaining operation of flights from/to the affected areas. Exit screening measures in affected areas are important and should be applied jointly with other measures including information strategies, epidemiological investigation, contact tracing, vaccination, and quarantine to achieve a comprehensive outbreak management response. Based on review results, an algorithm about decision-making for entry/exit screening was developed. MDPI 2019-11-21 2019-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6926871/ /pubmed/31766548 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16234638 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Mouchtouri, Varvara A.
Christoforidou, Eleni P.
an der Heiden, Maria
Menel Lemos, Cinthia
Fanos, Margherita
Rexroth, Ute
Grote, Ulrike
Belfroid, Evelien
Swaan, Corien
Hadjichristodoulou, Christos
Exit and Entry Screening Practices for Infectious Diseases among Travelers at Points of Entry: Looking for Evidence on Public Health Impact
title Exit and Entry Screening Practices for Infectious Diseases among Travelers at Points of Entry: Looking for Evidence on Public Health Impact
title_full Exit and Entry Screening Practices for Infectious Diseases among Travelers at Points of Entry: Looking for Evidence on Public Health Impact
title_fullStr Exit and Entry Screening Practices for Infectious Diseases among Travelers at Points of Entry: Looking for Evidence on Public Health Impact
title_full_unstemmed Exit and Entry Screening Practices for Infectious Diseases among Travelers at Points of Entry: Looking for Evidence on Public Health Impact
title_short Exit and Entry Screening Practices for Infectious Diseases among Travelers at Points of Entry: Looking for Evidence on Public Health Impact
title_sort exit and entry screening practices for infectious diseases among travelers at points of entry: looking for evidence on public health impact
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6926871/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31766548
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16234638
work_keys_str_mv AT mouchtourivarvaraa exitandentryscreeningpracticesforinfectiousdiseasesamongtravelersatpointsofentrylookingforevidenceonpublichealthimpact
AT christoforidouelenip exitandentryscreeningpracticesforinfectiousdiseasesamongtravelersatpointsofentrylookingforevidenceonpublichealthimpact
AT anderheidenmaria exitandentryscreeningpracticesforinfectiousdiseasesamongtravelersatpointsofentrylookingforevidenceonpublichealthimpact
AT menellemoscinthia exitandentryscreeningpracticesforinfectiousdiseasesamongtravelersatpointsofentrylookingforevidenceonpublichealthimpact
AT fanosmargherita exitandentryscreeningpracticesforinfectiousdiseasesamongtravelersatpointsofentrylookingforevidenceonpublichealthimpact
AT rexrothute exitandentryscreeningpracticesforinfectiousdiseasesamongtravelersatpointsofentrylookingforevidenceonpublichealthimpact
AT groteulrike exitandentryscreeningpracticesforinfectiousdiseasesamongtravelersatpointsofentrylookingforevidenceonpublichealthimpact
AT belfroidevelien exitandentryscreeningpracticesforinfectiousdiseasesamongtravelersatpointsofentrylookingforevidenceonpublichealthimpact
AT swaancorien exitandentryscreeningpracticesforinfectiousdiseasesamongtravelersatpointsofentrylookingforevidenceonpublichealthimpact
AT hadjichristodoulouchristos exitandentryscreeningpracticesforinfectiousdiseasesamongtravelersatpointsofentrylookingforevidenceonpublichealthimpact