Cargando…
Bring More Data!—A Good Advice? Removing Separation in Logistic Regression by Increasing Sample Size
The parameters of logistic regression models are usually obtained by the method of maximum likelihood (ML). However, in analyses of small data sets or data sets with unbalanced outcomes or exposures, ML parameter estimates may not exist. This situation has been termed ‘separation’ as the two outcome...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6926877/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31766753 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16234658 |
_version_ | 1783482195478839296 |
---|---|
author | Šinkovec, Hana Geroldinger, Angelika Heinze, Georg |
author_facet | Šinkovec, Hana Geroldinger, Angelika Heinze, Georg |
author_sort | Šinkovec, Hana |
collection | PubMed |
description | The parameters of logistic regression models are usually obtained by the method of maximum likelihood (ML). However, in analyses of small data sets or data sets with unbalanced outcomes or exposures, ML parameter estimates may not exist. This situation has been termed ‘separation’ as the two outcome groups are separated by the values of a covariate or a linear combination of covariates. To overcome the problem of non-existing ML parameter estimates, applying Firth’s correction (FC) was proposed. In practice, however, a principal investigator might be advised to ‘bring more data’ in order to solve a separation issue. We illustrate the problem by means of examples from colorectal cancer screening and ornithology. It is unclear if such an increasing sample size (ISS) strategy that keeps sampling new observations until separation is removed improves estimation compared to applying FC to the original data set. We performed an extensive simulation study where the main focus was to estimate the cost-adjusted relative efficiency of ML combined with ISS compared to FC. FC yielded reasonably small root mean squared errors and proved to be the more efficient estimator. Given our findings, we propose not to adapt the sample size when separation is encountered but to use FC as the default method of analysis whenever the number of observations or outcome events is critically low. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6926877 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69268772019-12-23 Bring More Data!—A Good Advice? Removing Separation in Logistic Regression by Increasing Sample Size Šinkovec, Hana Geroldinger, Angelika Heinze, Georg Int J Environ Res Public Health Article The parameters of logistic regression models are usually obtained by the method of maximum likelihood (ML). However, in analyses of small data sets or data sets with unbalanced outcomes or exposures, ML parameter estimates may not exist. This situation has been termed ‘separation’ as the two outcome groups are separated by the values of a covariate or a linear combination of covariates. To overcome the problem of non-existing ML parameter estimates, applying Firth’s correction (FC) was proposed. In practice, however, a principal investigator might be advised to ‘bring more data’ in order to solve a separation issue. We illustrate the problem by means of examples from colorectal cancer screening and ornithology. It is unclear if such an increasing sample size (ISS) strategy that keeps sampling new observations until separation is removed improves estimation compared to applying FC to the original data set. We performed an extensive simulation study where the main focus was to estimate the cost-adjusted relative efficiency of ML combined with ISS compared to FC. FC yielded reasonably small root mean squared errors and proved to be the more efficient estimator. Given our findings, we propose not to adapt the sample size when separation is encountered but to use FC as the default method of analysis whenever the number of observations or outcome events is critically low. MDPI 2019-11-22 2019-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6926877/ /pubmed/31766753 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16234658 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Šinkovec, Hana Geroldinger, Angelika Heinze, Georg Bring More Data!—A Good Advice? Removing Separation in Logistic Regression by Increasing Sample Size |
title | Bring More Data!—A Good Advice? Removing Separation in Logistic Regression by Increasing Sample Size |
title_full | Bring More Data!—A Good Advice? Removing Separation in Logistic Regression by Increasing Sample Size |
title_fullStr | Bring More Data!—A Good Advice? Removing Separation in Logistic Regression by Increasing Sample Size |
title_full_unstemmed | Bring More Data!—A Good Advice? Removing Separation in Logistic Regression by Increasing Sample Size |
title_short | Bring More Data!—A Good Advice? Removing Separation in Logistic Regression by Increasing Sample Size |
title_sort | bring more data!—a good advice? removing separation in logistic regression by increasing sample size |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6926877/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31766753 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16234658 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sinkovechana bringmoredataagoodadviceremovingseparationinlogisticregressionbyincreasingsamplesize AT geroldingerangelika bringmoredataagoodadviceremovingseparationinlogisticregressionbyincreasingsamplesize AT heinzegeorg bringmoredataagoodadviceremovingseparationinlogisticregressionbyincreasingsamplesize |