Cargando…
Influence of Print Orientation on Surface Roughness in Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) Processes
In the present paper, we address the influence of print orientation angle on surface roughness obtained in lateral walls in fused deposition modelling (FDM) processes. A geometrical model is defined that considers the shape of the filaments after deposition, in order to define a theoretical roughnes...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6926983/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31766409 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12233834 |
_version_ | 1783482220049072128 |
---|---|
author | Buj-Corral, Irene Domínguez-Fernández, Alejandro Durán-Llucià, Ramón |
author_facet | Buj-Corral, Irene Domínguez-Fernández, Alejandro Durán-Llucià, Ramón |
author_sort | Buj-Corral, Irene |
collection | PubMed |
description | In the present paper, we address the influence of print orientation angle on surface roughness obtained in lateral walls in fused deposition modelling (FDM) processes. A geometrical model is defined that considers the shape of the filaments after deposition, in order to define a theoretical roughness profile, for a certain print orientation angle. Different angles were considered between 5° and 85°. Simulated arithmetical mean height of the roughness profile, Ra values, were calculated from the simulated profiles. The Ra simulated results were compared to the experimental results, which were carried out with cylindrical PLA (polylactic acid) samples. The simulated Ra values were similar to the experimental values, except for high angles above 80°, where experimental roughness decreased while simulated roughness was still high. Low print orientation angles show regular profiles with rounded peaks and sharp values. At a print orientation angle of 85°, the shape of the profile changes with respect to lower angles, showing a gap between adjacent peaks. At 90°, both simulated and experimental roughness values would be close to zero, because the measurement direction is parallel to the layer orientation. Other roughness parameters were also measured: maximum height of profile, Rz, kurtosis, Rku, skewness, Rsk, and mean width of the profile elements, Rsm. At high print orientation angles, Rz decreases, Rku shifts to positive, Rsk slightly increases, and Rsk decreases, showing the change in the shape of the roughness profiles. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6926983 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69269832019-12-24 Influence of Print Orientation on Surface Roughness in Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) Processes Buj-Corral, Irene Domínguez-Fernández, Alejandro Durán-Llucià, Ramón Materials (Basel) Article In the present paper, we address the influence of print orientation angle on surface roughness obtained in lateral walls in fused deposition modelling (FDM) processes. A geometrical model is defined that considers the shape of the filaments after deposition, in order to define a theoretical roughness profile, for a certain print orientation angle. Different angles were considered between 5° and 85°. Simulated arithmetical mean height of the roughness profile, Ra values, were calculated from the simulated profiles. The Ra simulated results were compared to the experimental results, which were carried out with cylindrical PLA (polylactic acid) samples. The simulated Ra values were similar to the experimental values, except for high angles above 80°, where experimental roughness decreased while simulated roughness was still high. Low print orientation angles show regular profiles with rounded peaks and sharp values. At a print orientation angle of 85°, the shape of the profile changes with respect to lower angles, showing a gap between adjacent peaks. At 90°, both simulated and experimental roughness values would be close to zero, because the measurement direction is parallel to the layer orientation. Other roughness parameters were also measured: maximum height of profile, Rz, kurtosis, Rku, skewness, Rsk, and mean width of the profile elements, Rsm. At high print orientation angles, Rz decreases, Rku shifts to positive, Rsk slightly increases, and Rsk decreases, showing the change in the shape of the roughness profiles. MDPI 2019-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6926983/ /pubmed/31766409 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12233834 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Buj-Corral, Irene Domínguez-Fernández, Alejandro Durán-Llucià, Ramón Influence of Print Orientation on Surface Roughness in Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) Processes |
title | Influence of Print Orientation on Surface Roughness in Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) Processes |
title_full | Influence of Print Orientation on Surface Roughness in Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) Processes |
title_fullStr | Influence of Print Orientation on Surface Roughness in Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) Processes |
title_full_unstemmed | Influence of Print Orientation on Surface Roughness in Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) Processes |
title_short | Influence of Print Orientation on Surface Roughness in Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) Processes |
title_sort | influence of print orientation on surface roughness in fused deposition modeling (fdm) processes |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6926983/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31766409 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12233834 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bujcorralirene influenceofprintorientationonsurfaceroughnessinfuseddepositionmodelingfdmprocesses AT dominguezfernandezalejandro influenceofprintorientationonsurfaceroughnessinfuseddepositionmodelingfdmprocesses AT duranlluciaramon influenceofprintorientationonsurfaceroughnessinfuseddepositionmodelingfdmprocesses |