Cargando…
Comparison of Franseen and fork-tip needles for EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy of solid mass lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Franseen-tip and Fork-tip needles have been widely used in EUS guided fine-needle biopsy (FNB) of solid organs. There is conflicting data on the performance of these needles and unanswered questions on the ideal number of needle-passes and the requirement of an onsite cytopathologist (ROSE). We cond...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6927147/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31249163 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/eus.eus_27_19 |
_version_ | 1783482250326704128 |
---|---|
author | Mohan, Babu P. Shakhatreh, Mohammed Garg, Rajat Asokkumar, Ravishankar Jayaraj, Mahendran Ponnada, Suresh Navaneethan, Udayakumar Adler, Douglas G. |
author_facet | Mohan, Babu P. Shakhatreh, Mohammed Garg, Rajat Asokkumar, Ravishankar Jayaraj, Mahendran Ponnada, Suresh Navaneethan, Udayakumar Adler, Douglas G. |
author_sort | Mohan, Babu P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Franseen-tip and Fork-tip needles have been widely used in EUS guided fine-needle biopsy (FNB) of solid organs. There is conflicting data on the performance of these needles and unanswered questions on the ideal number of needle-passes and the requirement of an onsite cytopathologist (ROSE). We conducted a comprehensive search of multiple electronic databases and conference proceedings including PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases (from inception through July 2018) to identify studies that reported on the use of Forktip and Franseen-tip needles in EUS-FNB of solid organs. The primary outcome was to estimate and compare the pooled rates of diagnostic-yield. A subgroup analysis compared the outcomes based on the number of needle-passes and the availability of ROSE. A total of 23 study-arms were available for analysis. The pooled rate of diagnostic yield with Fork-tip needle was 92.8% (95% CI 85.3 - 96.6, I(2) = 73.1) and the pooled rate of diagnostic yield with Franseen-tip needle was 92.7% (95% CI 86.4 - 96.2, I(2) = 88.4). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6927147 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69271472019-12-26 Comparison of Franseen and fork-tip needles for EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy of solid mass lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis Mohan, Babu P. Shakhatreh, Mohammed Garg, Rajat Asokkumar, Ravishankar Jayaraj, Mahendran Ponnada, Suresh Navaneethan, Udayakumar Adler, Douglas G. Endosc Ultrasound Review Article Franseen-tip and Fork-tip needles have been widely used in EUS guided fine-needle biopsy (FNB) of solid organs. There is conflicting data on the performance of these needles and unanswered questions on the ideal number of needle-passes and the requirement of an onsite cytopathologist (ROSE). We conducted a comprehensive search of multiple electronic databases and conference proceedings including PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases (from inception through July 2018) to identify studies that reported on the use of Forktip and Franseen-tip needles in EUS-FNB of solid organs. The primary outcome was to estimate and compare the pooled rates of diagnostic-yield. A subgroup analysis compared the outcomes based on the number of needle-passes and the availability of ROSE. A total of 23 study-arms were available for analysis. The pooled rate of diagnostic yield with Fork-tip needle was 92.8% (95% CI 85.3 - 96.6, I(2) = 73.1) and the pooled rate of diagnostic yield with Franseen-tip needle was 92.7% (95% CI 86.4 - 96.2, I(2) = 88.4). Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6927147/ /pubmed/31249163 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/eus.eus_27_19 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Spring Media Publishing Co. Ltd http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Mohan, Babu P. Shakhatreh, Mohammed Garg, Rajat Asokkumar, Ravishankar Jayaraj, Mahendran Ponnada, Suresh Navaneethan, Udayakumar Adler, Douglas G. Comparison of Franseen and fork-tip needles for EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy of solid mass lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Comparison of Franseen and fork-tip needles for EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy of solid mass lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Comparison of Franseen and fork-tip needles for EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy of solid mass lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Franseen and fork-tip needles for EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy of solid mass lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Franseen and fork-tip needles for EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy of solid mass lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Comparison of Franseen and fork-tip needles for EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy of solid mass lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | comparison of franseen and fork-tip needles for eus-guided fine-needle biopsy of solid mass lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6927147/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31249163 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/eus.eus_27_19 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mohanbabup comparisonoffranseenandforktipneedlesforeusguidedfineneedlebiopsyofsolidmasslesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT shakhatrehmohammed comparisonoffranseenandforktipneedlesforeusguidedfineneedlebiopsyofsolidmasslesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT gargrajat comparisonoffranseenandforktipneedlesforeusguidedfineneedlebiopsyofsolidmasslesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT asokkumarravishankar comparisonoffranseenandforktipneedlesforeusguidedfineneedlebiopsyofsolidmasslesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT jayarajmahendran comparisonoffranseenandforktipneedlesforeusguidedfineneedlebiopsyofsolidmasslesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT ponnadasuresh comparisonoffranseenandforktipneedlesforeusguidedfineneedlebiopsyofsolidmasslesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT navaneethanudayakumar comparisonoffranseenandforktipneedlesforeusguidedfineneedlebiopsyofsolidmasslesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT adlerdouglasg comparisonoffranseenandforktipneedlesforeusguidedfineneedlebiopsyofsolidmasslesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |