Cargando…

Comparison of Franseen and fork-tip needles for EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy of solid mass lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Franseen-tip and Fork-tip needles have been widely used in EUS guided fine-needle biopsy (FNB) of solid organs. There is conflicting data on the performance of these needles and unanswered questions on the ideal number of needle-passes and the requirement of an onsite cytopathologist (ROSE). We cond...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mohan, Babu P., Shakhatreh, Mohammed, Garg, Rajat, Asokkumar, Ravishankar, Jayaraj, Mahendran, Ponnada, Suresh, Navaneethan, Udayakumar, Adler, Douglas G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6927147/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31249163
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/eus.eus_27_19
_version_ 1783482250326704128
author Mohan, Babu P.
Shakhatreh, Mohammed
Garg, Rajat
Asokkumar, Ravishankar
Jayaraj, Mahendran
Ponnada, Suresh
Navaneethan, Udayakumar
Adler, Douglas G.
author_facet Mohan, Babu P.
Shakhatreh, Mohammed
Garg, Rajat
Asokkumar, Ravishankar
Jayaraj, Mahendran
Ponnada, Suresh
Navaneethan, Udayakumar
Adler, Douglas G.
author_sort Mohan, Babu P.
collection PubMed
description Franseen-tip and Fork-tip needles have been widely used in EUS guided fine-needle biopsy (FNB) of solid organs. There is conflicting data on the performance of these needles and unanswered questions on the ideal number of needle-passes and the requirement of an onsite cytopathologist (ROSE). We conducted a comprehensive search of multiple electronic databases and conference proceedings including PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases (from inception through July 2018) to identify studies that reported on the use of Forktip and Franseen-tip needles in EUS-FNB of solid organs. The primary outcome was to estimate and compare the pooled rates of diagnostic-yield. A subgroup analysis compared the outcomes based on the number of needle-passes and the availability of ROSE. A total of 23 study-arms were available for analysis. The pooled rate of diagnostic yield with Fork-tip needle was 92.8% (95% CI 85.3 - 96.6, I(2) = 73.1) and the pooled rate of diagnostic yield with Franseen-tip needle was 92.7% (95% CI 86.4 - 96.2, I(2) = 88.4).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6927147
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69271472019-12-26 Comparison of Franseen and fork-tip needles for EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy of solid mass lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis Mohan, Babu P. Shakhatreh, Mohammed Garg, Rajat Asokkumar, Ravishankar Jayaraj, Mahendran Ponnada, Suresh Navaneethan, Udayakumar Adler, Douglas G. Endosc Ultrasound Review Article Franseen-tip and Fork-tip needles have been widely used in EUS guided fine-needle biopsy (FNB) of solid organs. There is conflicting data on the performance of these needles and unanswered questions on the ideal number of needle-passes and the requirement of an onsite cytopathologist (ROSE). We conducted a comprehensive search of multiple electronic databases and conference proceedings including PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases (from inception through July 2018) to identify studies that reported on the use of Forktip and Franseen-tip needles in EUS-FNB of solid organs. The primary outcome was to estimate and compare the pooled rates of diagnostic-yield. A subgroup analysis compared the outcomes based on the number of needle-passes and the availability of ROSE. A total of 23 study-arms were available for analysis. The pooled rate of diagnostic yield with Fork-tip needle was 92.8% (95% CI 85.3 - 96.6, I(2) = 73.1) and the pooled rate of diagnostic yield with Franseen-tip needle was 92.7% (95% CI 86.4 - 96.2, I(2) = 88.4). Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6927147/ /pubmed/31249163 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/eus.eus_27_19 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Spring Media Publishing Co. Ltd http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Review Article
Mohan, Babu P.
Shakhatreh, Mohammed
Garg, Rajat
Asokkumar, Ravishankar
Jayaraj, Mahendran
Ponnada, Suresh
Navaneethan, Udayakumar
Adler, Douglas G.
Comparison of Franseen and fork-tip needles for EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy of solid mass lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Comparison of Franseen and fork-tip needles for EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy of solid mass lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Comparison of Franseen and fork-tip needles for EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy of solid mass lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of Franseen and fork-tip needles for EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy of solid mass lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Franseen and fork-tip needles for EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy of solid mass lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Comparison of Franseen and fork-tip needles for EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy of solid mass lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort comparison of franseen and fork-tip needles for eus-guided fine-needle biopsy of solid mass lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6927147/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31249163
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/eus.eus_27_19
work_keys_str_mv AT mohanbabup comparisonoffranseenandforktipneedlesforeusguidedfineneedlebiopsyofsolidmasslesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shakhatrehmohammed comparisonoffranseenandforktipneedlesforeusguidedfineneedlebiopsyofsolidmasslesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gargrajat comparisonoffranseenandforktipneedlesforeusguidedfineneedlebiopsyofsolidmasslesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT asokkumarravishankar comparisonoffranseenandforktipneedlesforeusguidedfineneedlebiopsyofsolidmasslesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jayarajmahendran comparisonoffranseenandforktipneedlesforeusguidedfineneedlebiopsyofsolidmasslesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ponnadasuresh comparisonoffranseenandforktipneedlesforeusguidedfineneedlebiopsyofsolidmasslesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT navaneethanudayakumar comparisonoffranseenandforktipneedlesforeusguidedfineneedlebiopsyofsolidmasslesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT adlerdouglasg comparisonoffranseenandforktipneedlesforeusguidedfineneedlebiopsyofsolidmasslesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis