Cargando…
The Association of Public Insurance with Postpartum Contraception Preference and Provision
BACKGROUND: Prior studies have noted that public insurance status is associated with increased uptake of postpartum contraception whereas others have pointed to public insurance as a barrier to accessing highly effective forms of contraception. OBJECTIVE: To assess differences in planned method and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6927572/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31908549 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OAJC.S231196 |
_version_ | 1783482321732632576 |
---|---|
author | Verbus, Emily Ascha, Mustafa Wilkinson, Barbara Montague, Mary Morris, Jane Mercer, Brian M Arora, Kavita Shah |
author_facet | Verbus, Emily Ascha, Mustafa Wilkinson, Barbara Montague, Mary Morris, Jane Mercer, Brian M Arora, Kavita Shah |
author_sort | Verbus, Emily |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Prior studies have noted that public insurance status is associated with increased uptake of postpartum contraception whereas others have pointed to public insurance as a barrier to accessing highly effective forms of contraception. OBJECTIVE: To assess differences in planned method and provision of postpartum contraception according to insurance type. STUDY DESIGN: This is a secondary analysis of a retrospective cohort study examining postpartum women delivered at a single hospital in Cleveland, Ohio from 2012–2014. Contraceptive methods were analyzed according to Tier-based effectiveness as defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The primary outcome was postpartum contraception method preference. Additional outcomes included method provision, postpartum visit attendance, and subsequent pregnancy within 365 days of delivery. RESULTS: Of the 8281 patients in the study cohort, 1372 (16.6%) were privately and 6990 (83.4%) were publicly insured. After adjusting for the potentially confounding clinical and demographic factors through propensity score analysis, public insurance was not associated with preference for a Tier 1 versus Tier 2 postpartum contraceptive method (matched adjusted odds ratio [maOR] 0.89, 95% CI 0.69–1.15), but was associated with a preference for Tier 1/2 vs Tier 3/None (maOR 1.41, 95% CI 1.17–1.69). There was no difference between women with private or public insurance in terms of method provision by 90 days after delivery (maOR 0.94, 95% CI 0.75–1.17). Public insurance status was also associated with decreased postpartum visit attendance (maOR 0.54, 95% CI 0.43–0.68) and increased rates of subsequent pregnancy within 365 days of delivery (maOR 1.29, 95% CI 1.05–1.59). CONCLUSION: Public insurance status does not serve as a barrier to either the preference or provision of effective postpartum contraception. Women desiring highly- or moderately effective methods of contraception should have these methods provided prior to hospital discharge to minimize barriers to method provision. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6927572 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69275722020-01-06 The Association of Public Insurance with Postpartum Contraception Preference and Provision Verbus, Emily Ascha, Mustafa Wilkinson, Barbara Montague, Mary Morris, Jane Mercer, Brian M Arora, Kavita Shah Open Access J Contracept Original Research BACKGROUND: Prior studies have noted that public insurance status is associated with increased uptake of postpartum contraception whereas others have pointed to public insurance as a barrier to accessing highly effective forms of contraception. OBJECTIVE: To assess differences in planned method and provision of postpartum contraception according to insurance type. STUDY DESIGN: This is a secondary analysis of a retrospective cohort study examining postpartum women delivered at a single hospital in Cleveland, Ohio from 2012–2014. Contraceptive methods were analyzed according to Tier-based effectiveness as defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The primary outcome was postpartum contraception method preference. Additional outcomes included method provision, postpartum visit attendance, and subsequent pregnancy within 365 days of delivery. RESULTS: Of the 8281 patients in the study cohort, 1372 (16.6%) were privately and 6990 (83.4%) were publicly insured. After adjusting for the potentially confounding clinical and demographic factors through propensity score analysis, public insurance was not associated with preference for a Tier 1 versus Tier 2 postpartum contraceptive method (matched adjusted odds ratio [maOR] 0.89, 95% CI 0.69–1.15), but was associated with a preference for Tier 1/2 vs Tier 3/None (maOR 1.41, 95% CI 1.17–1.69). There was no difference between women with private or public insurance in terms of method provision by 90 days after delivery (maOR 0.94, 95% CI 0.75–1.17). Public insurance status was also associated with decreased postpartum visit attendance (maOR 0.54, 95% CI 0.43–0.68) and increased rates of subsequent pregnancy within 365 days of delivery (maOR 1.29, 95% CI 1.05–1.59). CONCLUSION: Public insurance status does not serve as a barrier to either the preference or provision of effective postpartum contraception. Women desiring highly- or moderately effective methods of contraception should have these methods provided prior to hospital discharge to minimize barriers to method provision. Dove 2019-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6927572/ /pubmed/31908549 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OAJC.S231196 Text en © 2019 Verbus et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Verbus, Emily Ascha, Mustafa Wilkinson, Barbara Montague, Mary Morris, Jane Mercer, Brian M Arora, Kavita Shah The Association of Public Insurance with Postpartum Contraception Preference and Provision |
title | The Association of Public Insurance with Postpartum Contraception Preference and Provision |
title_full | The Association of Public Insurance with Postpartum Contraception Preference and Provision |
title_fullStr | The Association of Public Insurance with Postpartum Contraception Preference and Provision |
title_full_unstemmed | The Association of Public Insurance with Postpartum Contraception Preference and Provision |
title_short | The Association of Public Insurance with Postpartum Contraception Preference and Provision |
title_sort | association of public insurance with postpartum contraception preference and provision |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6927572/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31908549 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OAJC.S231196 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT verbusemily theassociationofpublicinsurancewithpostpartumcontraceptionpreferenceandprovision AT aschamustafa theassociationofpublicinsurancewithpostpartumcontraceptionpreferenceandprovision AT wilkinsonbarbara theassociationofpublicinsurancewithpostpartumcontraceptionpreferenceandprovision AT montaguemary theassociationofpublicinsurancewithpostpartumcontraceptionpreferenceandprovision AT morrisjane theassociationofpublicinsurancewithpostpartumcontraceptionpreferenceandprovision AT mercerbrianm theassociationofpublicinsurancewithpostpartumcontraceptionpreferenceandprovision AT arorakavitashah theassociationofpublicinsurancewithpostpartumcontraceptionpreferenceandprovision AT verbusemily associationofpublicinsurancewithpostpartumcontraceptionpreferenceandprovision AT aschamustafa associationofpublicinsurancewithpostpartumcontraceptionpreferenceandprovision AT wilkinsonbarbara associationofpublicinsurancewithpostpartumcontraceptionpreferenceandprovision AT montaguemary associationofpublicinsurancewithpostpartumcontraceptionpreferenceandprovision AT morrisjane associationofpublicinsurancewithpostpartumcontraceptionpreferenceandprovision AT mercerbrianm associationofpublicinsurancewithpostpartumcontraceptionpreferenceandprovision AT arorakavitashah associationofpublicinsurancewithpostpartumcontraceptionpreferenceandprovision |