Cargando…
“Interchangeability” of PD-L1 immunohistochemistry assays: a meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy
Different clones, protocol conditions, instruments, and scoring/readout methods may pose challenges in introducing different PD-L1 assays for immunotherapy. The diagnostic accuracy of using different PD-L1 assays interchangeably for various purposes is unknown. The primary objective of this meta-ana...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group US
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6927905/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31383961 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41379-019-0327-4 |
_version_ | 1783482363482734592 |
---|---|
author | Torlakovic, Emina Lim, Hyun J. Adam, Julien Barnes, Penny Bigras, Gilbert Chan, Anthony W. H. Cheung, Carol C. Chung, Jin-Haeng Couture, Christian Fiset, Pierre O. Fujimoto, Daichi Han, Gang Hirsch, Fred R. Ilie, Marius Ionescu, Diana Li, Chao Munari, Enrico Okuda, Katsuhiro Ratcliffe, Marianne J. Rimm, David L. Ross, Catherine Røge, Rasmus Scheel, Andreas H. Soo, Ross A. Swanson, Paul E. Tretiakova, Maria To, Ka F. Vainer, Gilad W. Wang, Hangjun Xu, Zhaolin Zielinski, Dirk Tsao, Ming-Sound |
author_facet | Torlakovic, Emina Lim, Hyun J. Adam, Julien Barnes, Penny Bigras, Gilbert Chan, Anthony W. H. Cheung, Carol C. Chung, Jin-Haeng Couture, Christian Fiset, Pierre O. Fujimoto, Daichi Han, Gang Hirsch, Fred R. Ilie, Marius Ionescu, Diana Li, Chao Munari, Enrico Okuda, Katsuhiro Ratcliffe, Marianne J. Rimm, David L. Ross, Catherine Røge, Rasmus Scheel, Andreas H. Soo, Ross A. Swanson, Paul E. Tretiakova, Maria To, Ka F. Vainer, Gilad W. Wang, Hangjun Xu, Zhaolin Zielinski, Dirk Tsao, Ming-Sound |
author_sort | Torlakovic, Emina |
collection | PubMed |
description | Different clones, protocol conditions, instruments, and scoring/readout methods may pose challenges in introducing different PD-L1 assays for immunotherapy. The diagnostic accuracy of using different PD-L1 assays interchangeably for various purposes is unknown. The primary objective of this meta-analysis was to address PD-L1 assay interchangeability based on assay diagnostic accuracy for established clinical uses/purposes. A systematic search of the MEDLINE database using PubMed platform was conducted using “PD-L1” as a search term for 01/01/2015 to 31/08/2018, with limitations “English” and “human”. 2,515 abstracts were reviewed to select for original contributions only. 57 studies on comparison of two or more PD-L1 assays were fully reviewed. 22 publications were selected for meta-analysis. Additional data were requested from authors of 20/22 studies in order to enable the meta-analysis. Modified GRADE and QUADAS-2 criteria were used for grading published evidence and designing data abstraction templates for extraction by reviewers. PRISMA was used to guide reporting of systematic review and meta-analysis and STARD 2015 for reporting diagnostic accuracy study. CLSI EP12-A2 was used to guide test comparisons. Data were pooled using random-effects model. The main outcome measure was diagnostic accuracy of various PD-L1 assays. The 22 included studies provided 376 2×2 contingency tables for analyses. Results of our study suggest that, when the testing laboratory is not able to use an Food and Drug Administration-approved companion diagnostic(s) for PD-L1 assessment for its specific clinical purpose(s), it is better to develop a properly validated laboratory developed test for the same purpose(s) as the original PD-L1 Food and Drug Administration-approved immunohistochemistry companion diagnostic, than to replace the original PD-L1 Food and Drug Administration-approved immunohistochemistry companion diagnostic with a another PD-L1 Food and Drug Administration-approved companion diagnostic that was developed for a different purpose. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6927905 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69279052019-12-26 “Interchangeability” of PD-L1 immunohistochemistry assays: a meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy Torlakovic, Emina Lim, Hyun J. Adam, Julien Barnes, Penny Bigras, Gilbert Chan, Anthony W. H. Cheung, Carol C. Chung, Jin-Haeng Couture, Christian Fiset, Pierre O. Fujimoto, Daichi Han, Gang Hirsch, Fred R. Ilie, Marius Ionescu, Diana Li, Chao Munari, Enrico Okuda, Katsuhiro Ratcliffe, Marianne J. Rimm, David L. Ross, Catherine Røge, Rasmus Scheel, Andreas H. Soo, Ross A. Swanson, Paul E. Tretiakova, Maria To, Ka F. Vainer, Gilad W. Wang, Hangjun Xu, Zhaolin Zielinski, Dirk Tsao, Ming-Sound Mod Pathol Review Article Different clones, protocol conditions, instruments, and scoring/readout methods may pose challenges in introducing different PD-L1 assays for immunotherapy. The diagnostic accuracy of using different PD-L1 assays interchangeably for various purposes is unknown. The primary objective of this meta-analysis was to address PD-L1 assay interchangeability based on assay diagnostic accuracy for established clinical uses/purposes. A systematic search of the MEDLINE database using PubMed platform was conducted using “PD-L1” as a search term for 01/01/2015 to 31/08/2018, with limitations “English” and “human”. 2,515 abstracts were reviewed to select for original contributions only. 57 studies on comparison of two or more PD-L1 assays were fully reviewed. 22 publications were selected for meta-analysis. Additional data were requested from authors of 20/22 studies in order to enable the meta-analysis. Modified GRADE and QUADAS-2 criteria were used for grading published evidence and designing data abstraction templates for extraction by reviewers. PRISMA was used to guide reporting of systematic review and meta-analysis and STARD 2015 for reporting diagnostic accuracy study. CLSI EP12-A2 was used to guide test comparisons. Data were pooled using random-effects model. The main outcome measure was diagnostic accuracy of various PD-L1 assays. The 22 included studies provided 376 2×2 contingency tables for analyses. Results of our study suggest that, when the testing laboratory is not able to use an Food and Drug Administration-approved companion diagnostic(s) for PD-L1 assessment for its specific clinical purpose(s), it is better to develop a properly validated laboratory developed test for the same purpose(s) as the original PD-L1 Food and Drug Administration-approved immunohistochemistry companion diagnostic, than to replace the original PD-L1 Food and Drug Administration-approved immunohistochemistry companion diagnostic with a another PD-L1 Food and Drug Administration-approved companion diagnostic that was developed for a different purpose. Nature Publishing Group US 2019-08-05 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC6927905/ /pubmed/31383961 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41379-019-0327-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Torlakovic, Emina Lim, Hyun J. Adam, Julien Barnes, Penny Bigras, Gilbert Chan, Anthony W. H. Cheung, Carol C. Chung, Jin-Haeng Couture, Christian Fiset, Pierre O. Fujimoto, Daichi Han, Gang Hirsch, Fred R. Ilie, Marius Ionescu, Diana Li, Chao Munari, Enrico Okuda, Katsuhiro Ratcliffe, Marianne J. Rimm, David L. Ross, Catherine Røge, Rasmus Scheel, Andreas H. Soo, Ross A. Swanson, Paul E. Tretiakova, Maria To, Ka F. Vainer, Gilad W. Wang, Hangjun Xu, Zhaolin Zielinski, Dirk Tsao, Ming-Sound “Interchangeability” of PD-L1 immunohistochemistry assays: a meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy |
title | “Interchangeability” of PD-L1 immunohistochemistry assays: a meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy |
title_full | “Interchangeability” of PD-L1 immunohistochemistry assays: a meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy |
title_fullStr | “Interchangeability” of PD-L1 immunohistochemistry assays: a meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy |
title_full_unstemmed | “Interchangeability” of PD-L1 immunohistochemistry assays: a meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy |
title_short | “Interchangeability” of PD-L1 immunohistochemistry assays: a meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy |
title_sort | “interchangeability” of pd-l1 immunohistochemistry assays: a meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6927905/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31383961 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41379-019-0327-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT torlakovicemina interchangeabilityofpdl1immunohistochemistryassaysametaanalysisofdiagnosticaccuracy AT limhyunj interchangeabilityofpdl1immunohistochemistryassaysametaanalysisofdiagnosticaccuracy AT adamjulien interchangeabilityofpdl1immunohistochemistryassaysametaanalysisofdiagnosticaccuracy AT barnespenny interchangeabilityofpdl1immunohistochemistryassaysametaanalysisofdiagnosticaccuracy AT bigrasgilbert interchangeabilityofpdl1immunohistochemistryassaysametaanalysisofdiagnosticaccuracy AT chananthonywh interchangeabilityofpdl1immunohistochemistryassaysametaanalysisofdiagnosticaccuracy AT cheungcarolc interchangeabilityofpdl1immunohistochemistryassaysametaanalysisofdiagnosticaccuracy AT chungjinhaeng interchangeabilityofpdl1immunohistochemistryassaysametaanalysisofdiagnosticaccuracy AT couturechristian interchangeabilityofpdl1immunohistochemistryassaysametaanalysisofdiagnosticaccuracy AT fisetpierreo interchangeabilityofpdl1immunohistochemistryassaysametaanalysisofdiagnosticaccuracy AT fujimotodaichi interchangeabilityofpdl1immunohistochemistryassaysametaanalysisofdiagnosticaccuracy AT hangang interchangeabilityofpdl1immunohistochemistryassaysametaanalysisofdiagnosticaccuracy AT hirschfredr interchangeabilityofpdl1immunohistochemistryassaysametaanalysisofdiagnosticaccuracy AT iliemarius interchangeabilityofpdl1immunohistochemistryassaysametaanalysisofdiagnosticaccuracy AT ionescudiana interchangeabilityofpdl1immunohistochemistryassaysametaanalysisofdiagnosticaccuracy AT lichao interchangeabilityofpdl1immunohistochemistryassaysametaanalysisofdiagnosticaccuracy AT munarienrico interchangeabilityofpdl1immunohistochemistryassaysametaanalysisofdiagnosticaccuracy AT okudakatsuhiro interchangeabilityofpdl1immunohistochemistryassaysametaanalysisofdiagnosticaccuracy AT ratcliffemariannej interchangeabilityofpdl1immunohistochemistryassaysametaanalysisofdiagnosticaccuracy AT rimmdavidl interchangeabilityofpdl1immunohistochemistryassaysametaanalysisofdiagnosticaccuracy AT rosscatherine interchangeabilityofpdl1immunohistochemistryassaysametaanalysisofdiagnosticaccuracy AT røgerasmus interchangeabilityofpdl1immunohistochemistryassaysametaanalysisofdiagnosticaccuracy AT scheelandreash interchangeabilityofpdl1immunohistochemistryassaysametaanalysisofdiagnosticaccuracy AT soorossa interchangeabilityofpdl1immunohistochemistryassaysametaanalysisofdiagnosticaccuracy AT swansonpaule interchangeabilityofpdl1immunohistochemistryassaysametaanalysisofdiagnosticaccuracy AT tretiakovamaria interchangeabilityofpdl1immunohistochemistryassaysametaanalysisofdiagnosticaccuracy AT tokaf interchangeabilityofpdl1immunohistochemistryassaysametaanalysisofdiagnosticaccuracy AT vainergiladw interchangeabilityofpdl1immunohistochemistryassaysametaanalysisofdiagnosticaccuracy AT wanghangjun interchangeabilityofpdl1immunohistochemistryassaysametaanalysisofdiagnosticaccuracy AT xuzhaolin interchangeabilityofpdl1immunohistochemistryassaysametaanalysisofdiagnosticaccuracy AT zielinskidirk interchangeabilityofpdl1immunohistochemistryassaysametaanalysisofdiagnosticaccuracy AT tsaomingsound interchangeabilityofpdl1immunohistochemistryassaysametaanalysisofdiagnosticaccuracy |