Cargando…
Interspecific competition among aphid parasitoids: molecular approaches reveal preferential exploitation of parasitized hosts
When a guild of species exploit the same limited resources, interspecific competition induces the exclusion of inferior competitors, in which case, interspecific recognition mechanisms are needed. Here, we address resource partitioning and interspecific competition among three main solitary parasito...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6928038/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31873169 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-56187-3 |
_version_ | 1783482395051163648 |
---|---|
author | Ortiz-Martínez, Sebastián Pierre, Jean-Sébastien van Baaren, Joan Le Lann, Cécile Zepeda-Paulo, Francisca Lavandero, Blas |
author_facet | Ortiz-Martínez, Sebastián Pierre, Jean-Sébastien van Baaren, Joan Le Lann, Cécile Zepeda-Paulo, Francisca Lavandero, Blas |
author_sort | Ortiz-Martínez, Sebastián |
collection | PubMed |
description | When a guild of species exploit the same limited resources, interspecific competition induces the exclusion of inferior competitors, in which case, interspecific recognition mechanisms are needed. Here, we address resource partitioning and interspecific competition among three main solitary parasitoid species attacking the same host resource, the aphid Sitobion avenae in wheat fields. Optimal host acceptance models predict that parasitoid species should prefer attacking unparasitized hosts when they are available in order to maximize their fitness, as already parasitized hosts are less valuable for laying eggs, especially for inferior competitors. Therefore, we expected the level of competition (multiparasitism) in the field to increase at low host density. By using a combination of taxonomical (determination) and molecular (PCR-based) approaches, we assessed the species of all parasitoid adults and immature stages within aphid hosts. Our results demonstrate that, early in the season, the multiparasitism rates were low, whereas they were high in the mid-late season, corresponding to an aphid density decrease over time. Moreover, parasitoid species could not have been exploiting host resources randomly and the better competitor, Aphidius ervi, seemed to be foraging preferentially on hosts already parasitized by the inferior competitor A. rhopalosiphi, even when unparasitized hosts were still available. This could be due to differences in their host detection capability, as species with a narrow host range may be better at detecting their hosts in comparison with species with a greater host range, such as A. ervi, with a greater host range within the guild. Our study suggests differences in the host exploitation of two prevalent parasitoid species through the main period of aphid colonization, which still allowed the coexistence of a third inferior competitor (A. rhopalosiphi) within the assemblage, in spite of some negative interactions (multiparasitism) and redundancies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6928038 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69280382019-12-27 Interspecific competition among aphid parasitoids: molecular approaches reveal preferential exploitation of parasitized hosts Ortiz-Martínez, Sebastián Pierre, Jean-Sébastien van Baaren, Joan Le Lann, Cécile Zepeda-Paulo, Francisca Lavandero, Blas Sci Rep Article When a guild of species exploit the same limited resources, interspecific competition induces the exclusion of inferior competitors, in which case, interspecific recognition mechanisms are needed. Here, we address resource partitioning and interspecific competition among three main solitary parasitoid species attacking the same host resource, the aphid Sitobion avenae in wheat fields. Optimal host acceptance models predict that parasitoid species should prefer attacking unparasitized hosts when they are available in order to maximize their fitness, as already parasitized hosts are less valuable for laying eggs, especially for inferior competitors. Therefore, we expected the level of competition (multiparasitism) in the field to increase at low host density. By using a combination of taxonomical (determination) and molecular (PCR-based) approaches, we assessed the species of all parasitoid adults and immature stages within aphid hosts. Our results demonstrate that, early in the season, the multiparasitism rates were low, whereas they were high in the mid-late season, corresponding to an aphid density decrease over time. Moreover, parasitoid species could not have been exploiting host resources randomly and the better competitor, Aphidius ervi, seemed to be foraging preferentially on hosts already parasitized by the inferior competitor A. rhopalosiphi, even when unparasitized hosts were still available. This could be due to differences in their host detection capability, as species with a narrow host range may be better at detecting their hosts in comparison with species with a greater host range, such as A. ervi, with a greater host range within the guild. Our study suggests differences in the host exploitation of two prevalent parasitoid species through the main period of aphid colonization, which still allowed the coexistence of a third inferior competitor (A. rhopalosiphi) within the assemblage, in spite of some negative interactions (multiparasitism) and redundancies. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6928038/ /pubmed/31873169 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-56187-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Ortiz-Martínez, Sebastián Pierre, Jean-Sébastien van Baaren, Joan Le Lann, Cécile Zepeda-Paulo, Francisca Lavandero, Blas Interspecific competition among aphid parasitoids: molecular approaches reveal preferential exploitation of parasitized hosts |
title | Interspecific competition among aphid parasitoids: molecular approaches reveal preferential exploitation of parasitized hosts |
title_full | Interspecific competition among aphid parasitoids: molecular approaches reveal preferential exploitation of parasitized hosts |
title_fullStr | Interspecific competition among aphid parasitoids: molecular approaches reveal preferential exploitation of parasitized hosts |
title_full_unstemmed | Interspecific competition among aphid parasitoids: molecular approaches reveal preferential exploitation of parasitized hosts |
title_short | Interspecific competition among aphid parasitoids: molecular approaches reveal preferential exploitation of parasitized hosts |
title_sort | interspecific competition among aphid parasitoids: molecular approaches reveal preferential exploitation of parasitized hosts |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6928038/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31873169 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-56187-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ortizmartinezsebastian interspecificcompetitionamongaphidparasitoidsmolecularapproachesrevealpreferentialexploitationofparasitizedhosts AT pierrejeansebastien interspecificcompetitionamongaphidparasitoidsmolecularapproachesrevealpreferentialexploitationofparasitizedhosts AT vanbaarenjoan interspecificcompetitionamongaphidparasitoidsmolecularapproachesrevealpreferentialexploitationofparasitizedhosts AT lelanncecile interspecificcompetitionamongaphidparasitoidsmolecularapproachesrevealpreferentialexploitationofparasitizedhosts AT zepedapaulofrancisca interspecificcompetitionamongaphidparasitoidsmolecularapproachesrevealpreferentialexploitationofparasitizedhosts AT lavanderoblas interspecificcompetitionamongaphidparasitoidsmolecularapproachesrevealpreferentialexploitationofparasitizedhosts |