Cargando…

Choice of Capecitabine or S1 in Combination with Oxaliplatin based on Thymidine Phosphorylase and Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase Expression Status in Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer

PURPOSE: To study the efficacy of capecitabine or S-1 plus oxaliplatin (CAPOX or SOX) for treating thymidine phosphorylase (TP)- or dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD)-positive advanced gastric cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-six patients with stage IIIC to IV gastric cancer were assessed fo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Rong, He, Xiaolei, Wufuli, Reyina, Su, Ying, Ma, Lili, Chen, Ru, Han, Zhongcheng, Wang, Fang, Liu, Jiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Gastric Cancer Association 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6928084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31897343
http://dx.doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2019.19.e40
_version_ 1783482405958451200
author Xu, Rong
He, Xiaolei
Wufuli, Reyina
Su, Ying
Ma, Lili
Chen, Ru
Han, Zhongcheng
Wang, Fang
Liu, Jiang
author_facet Xu, Rong
He, Xiaolei
Wufuli, Reyina
Su, Ying
Ma, Lili
Chen, Ru
Han, Zhongcheng
Wang, Fang
Liu, Jiang
author_sort Xu, Rong
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To study the efficacy of capecitabine or S-1 plus oxaliplatin (CAPOX or SOX) for treating thymidine phosphorylase (TP)- or dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD)-positive advanced gastric cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-six patients with stage IIIC to IV gastric cancer were assessed for TP and DPD expression by immunohistochemistry. The association between CAPOX or SOX efficacy and TP/DPD expression was retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the objective remission rate (ORR, 52.27% vs. 47.62%; P>0.05), disease control rate (72.73% vs. 73.81%, P>0.05), progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 1.119; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.739–1.741; P=0.586), and overall survival (OS; HR, 0.855; 95% CI, 0.481–1.511; P=0.588) between CAPOX and SOX. A higher number of stage IV patients showed TP positivity, while DPD-positive patients predominantly showed intestinal type of gastric cancer. In TP-positive patients, the ORRs associated with CAPOX and SOX treatments were 57.14% and 38.10%, respectively; OS was better with CAPOX than with SOX (HR, 0.447; 95% CI, 0.179–0.978; P=0.046). Among DPD-positive patients, the SOX treatment-associated ORR (60.87%) was significantly higher than the CAPOX treatment-associated ORR (43.48%). Furthermore, SOX treatment resulted in better OS than did CAPOX treatment (HR, 2.020; 95% CI, 1.019–4.837; P=0.049). CONCLUSIONS: No significant difference in clinical efficacy was found between CAPOX and SOX. TP-positive patients might respond better to CAPOX while DPD-positive patients may respond better to SOX. Our findings might serve as a guide for personalized chemotherapy for gastric cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6928084
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher The Korean Gastric Cancer Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69280842020-01-02 Choice of Capecitabine or S1 in Combination with Oxaliplatin based on Thymidine Phosphorylase and Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase Expression Status in Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer Xu, Rong He, Xiaolei Wufuli, Reyina Su, Ying Ma, Lili Chen, Ru Han, Zhongcheng Wang, Fang Liu, Jiang J Gastric Cancer Original Article PURPOSE: To study the efficacy of capecitabine or S-1 plus oxaliplatin (CAPOX or SOX) for treating thymidine phosphorylase (TP)- or dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD)-positive advanced gastric cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-six patients with stage IIIC to IV gastric cancer were assessed for TP and DPD expression by immunohistochemistry. The association between CAPOX or SOX efficacy and TP/DPD expression was retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the objective remission rate (ORR, 52.27% vs. 47.62%; P>0.05), disease control rate (72.73% vs. 73.81%, P>0.05), progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 1.119; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.739–1.741; P=0.586), and overall survival (OS; HR, 0.855; 95% CI, 0.481–1.511; P=0.588) between CAPOX and SOX. A higher number of stage IV patients showed TP positivity, while DPD-positive patients predominantly showed intestinal type of gastric cancer. In TP-positive patients, the ORRs associated with CAPOX and SOX treatments were 57.14% and 38.10%, respectively; OS was better with CAPOX than with SOX (HR, 0.447; 95% CI, 0.179–0.978; P=0.046). Among DPD-positive patients, the SOX treatment-associated ORR (60.87%) was significantly higher than the CAPOX treatment-associated ORR (43.48%). Furthermore, SOX treatment resulted in better OS than did CAPOX treatment (HR, 2.020; 95% CI, 1.019–4.837; P=0.049). CONCLUSIONS: No significant difference in clinical efficacy was found between CAPOX and SOX. TP-positive patients might respond better to CAPOX while DPD-positive patients may respond better to SOX. Our findings might serve as a guide for personalized chemotherapy for gastric cancer. The Korean Gastric Cancer Association 2019-12 2019-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6928084/ /pubmed/31897343 http://dx.doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2019.19.e40 Text en Copyright © 2019. Korean Gastric Cancer Association https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Xu, Rong
He, Xiaolei
Wufuli, Reyina
Su, Ying
Ma, Lili
Chen, Ru
Han, Zhongcheng
Wang, Fang
Liu, Jiang
Choice of Capecitabine or S1 in Combination with Oxaliplatin based on Thymidine Phosphorylase and Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase Expression Status in Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer
title Choice of Capecitabine or S1 in Combination with Oxaliplatin based on Thymidine Phosphorylase and Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase Expression Status in Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer
title_full Choice of Capecitabine or S1 in Combination with Oxaliplatin based on Thymidine Phosphorylase and Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase Expression Status in Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer
title_fullStr Choice of Capecitabine or S1 in Combination with Oxaliplatin based on Thymidine Phosphorylase and Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase Expression Status in Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Choice of Capecitabine or S1 in Combination with Oxaliplatin based on Thymidine Phosphorylase and Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase Expression Status in Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer
title_short Choice of Capecitabine or S1 in Combination with Oxaliplatin based on Thymidine Phosphorylase and Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase Expression Status in Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer
title_sort choice of capecitabine or s1 in combination with oxaliplatin based on thymidine phosphorylase and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase expression status in patients with advanced gastric cancer
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6928084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31897343
http://dx.doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2019.19.e40
work_keys_str_mv AT xurong choiceofcapecitabineors1incombinationwithoxaliplatinbasedonthymidinephosphorylaseanddihydropyrimidinedehydrogenaseexpressionstatusinpatientswithadvancedgastriccancer
AT hexiaolei choiceofcapecitabineors1incombinationwithoxaliplatinbasedonthymidinephosphorylaseanddihydropyrimidinedehydrogenaseexpressionstatusinpatientswithadvancedgastriccancer
AT wufulireyina choiceofcapecitabineors1incombinationwithoxaliplatinbasedonthymidinephosphorylaseanddihydropyrimidinedehydrogenaseexpressionstatusinpatientswithadvancedgastriccancer
AT suying choiceofcapecitabineors1incombinationwithoxaliplatinbasedonthymidinephosphorylaseanddihydropyrimidinedehydrogenaseexpressionstatusinpatientswithadvancedgastriccancer
AT malili choiceofcapecitabineors1incombinationwithoxaliplatinbasedonthymidinephosphorylaseanddihydropyrimidinedehydrogenaseexpressionstatusinpatientswithadvancedgastriccancer
AT chenru choiceofcapecitabineors1incombinationwithoxaliplatinbasedonthymidinephosphorylaseanddihydropyrimidinedehydrogenaseexpressionstatusinpatientswithadvancedgastriccancer
AT hanzhongcheng choiceofcapecitabineors1incombinationwithoxaliplatinbasedonthymidinephosphorylaseanddihydropyrimidinedehydrogenaseexpressionstatusinpatientswithadvancedgastriccancer
AT wangfang choiceofcapecitabineors1incombinationwithoxaliplatinbasedonthymidinephosphorylaseanddihydropyrimidinedehydrogenaseexpressionstatusinpatientswithadvancedgastriccancer
AT liujiang choiceofcapecitabineors1incombinationwithoxaliplatinbasedonthymidinephosphorylaseanddihydropyrimidinedehydrogenaseexpressionstatusinpatientswithadvancedgastriccancer