Cargando…
Breast Reconstruction with a Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine Approach (Systematic Review)
Current techniques for breast reconstruction include an autologous-tissue flap or an implant-based procedure, although both can impose further morbidity. This systematic review aims to explore the existing literature on breast reconstruction using a tissue engineering approach; conducted with the da...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6928092/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31576501 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10439-019-02373-3 |
_version_ | 1783482407858470912 |
---|---|
author | Donnely, E. Griffin, M. Butler, P. E. |
author_facet | Donnely, E. Griffin, M. Butler, P. E. |
author_sort | Donnely, E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Current techniques for breast reconstruction include an autologous-tissue flap or an implant-based procedure, although both can impose further morbidity. This systematic review aims to explore the existing literature on breast reconstruction using a tissue engineering approach; conducted with the databases Medline and Embase. A total of 28 articles were included, mainly comprising of level-5 evidence with in vitro and animal studies focusing on utilizing scaffolds to support the migration and growth of new tissue; scaffolds can be either biological or synthetic. Biological scaffolds were composed of collagen or a decellularized tissue matrix scaffold. Synthetic scaffolds were primarily composed of polymers with customisable designs, adjusting the internal morphology and pore size. Implanting cells, including adipose-derived stem cells, with combined use of basic fibroblast growth factor has been studied in an attempt to enhance tissue regeneration. Lately, a level-4 evidence human case series was reported; successfully regenerating 210 mL of tissue using an arterio-venous pedicled fat flap within a tissue engineering chamber implanted on the chest wall. Further research is required to evaluate whether the use of cells and other growth factors could adjust the composition of regenerated tissue and improve vascularity; the latter a major limiting factor for creating larger volumes of tissue. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6928092 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69280922020-01-07 Breast Reconstruction with a Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine Approach (Systematic Review) Donnely, E. Griffin, M. Butler, P. E. Ann Biomed Eng Review Current techniques for breast reconstruction include an autologous-tissue flap or an implant-based procedure, although both can impose further morbidity. This systematic review aims to explore the existing literature on breast reconstruction using a tissue engineering approach; conducted with the databases Medline and Embase. A total of 28 articles were included, mainly comprising of level-5 evidence with in vitro and animal studies focusing on utilizing scaffolds to support the migration and growth of new tissue; scaffolds can be either biological or synthetic. Biological scaffolds were composed of collagen or a decellularized tissue matrix scaffold. Synthetic scaffolds were primarily composed of polymers with customisable designs, adjusting the internal morphology and pore size. Implanting cells, including adipose-derived stem cells, with combined use of basic fibroblast growth factor has been studied in an attempt to enhance tissue regeneration. Lately, a level-4 evidence human case series was reported; successfully regenerating 210 mL of tissue using an arterio-venous pedicled fat flap within a tissue engineering chamber implanted on the chest wall. Further research is required to evaluate whether the use of cells and other growth factors could adjust the composition of regenerated tissue and improve vascularity; the latter a major limiting factor for creating larger volumes of tissue. Springer US 2019-10-01 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC6928092/ /pubmed/31576501 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10439-019-02373-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Review Donnely, E. Griffin, M. Butler, P. E. Breast Reconstruction with a Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine Approach (Systematic Review) |
title | Breast Reconstruction with a Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine Approach (Systematic Review) |
title_full | Breast Reconstruction with a Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine Approach (Systematic Review) |
title_fullStr | Breast Reconstruction with a Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine Approach (Systematic Review) |
title_full_unstemmed | Breast Reconstruction with a Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine Approach (Systematic Review) |
title_short | Breast Reconstruction with a Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine Approach (Systematic Review) |
title_sort | breast reconstruction with a tissue engineering and regenerative medicine approach (systematic review) |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6928092/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31576501 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10439-019-02373-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT donnelye breastreconstructionwithatissueengineeringandregenerativemedicineapproachsystematicreview AT griffinm breastreconstructionwithatissueengineeringandregenerativemedicineapproachsystematicreview AT butlerpe breastreconstructionwithatissueengineeringandregenerativemedicineapproachsystematicreview |