Cargando…

Breast Reconstruction with a Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine Approach (Systematic Review)

Current techniques for breast reconstruction include an autologous-tissue flap or an implant-based procedure, although both can impose further morbidity. This systematic review aims to explore the existing literature on breast reconstruction using a tissue engineering approach; conducted with the da...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Donnely, E., Griffin, M., Butler, P. E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6928092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31576501
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10439-019-02373-3
_version_ 1783482407858470912
author Donnely, E.
Griffin, M.
Butler, P. E.
author_facet Donnely, E.
Griffin, M.
Butler, P. E.
author_sort Donnely, E.
collection PubMed
description Current techniques for breast reconstruction include an autologous-tissue flap or an implant-based procedure, although both can impose further morbidity. This systematic review aims to explore the existing literature on breast reconstruction using a tissue engineering approach; conducted with the databases Medline and Embase. A total of 28 articles were included, mainly comprising of level-5 evidence with in vitro and animal studies focusing on utilizing scaffolds to support the migration and growth of new tissue; scaffolds can be either biological or synthetic. Biological scaffolds were composed of collagen or a decellularized tissue matrix scaffold. Synthetic scaffolds were primarily composed of polymers with customisable designs, adjusting the internal morphology and pore size. Implanting cells, including adipose-derived stem cells, with combined use of basic fibroblast growth factor has been studied in an attempt to enhance tissue regeneration. Lately, a level-4 evidence human case series was reported; successfully regenerating 210 mL of tissue using an arterio-venous pedicled fat flap within a tissue engineering chamber implanted on the chest wall. Further research is required to evaluate whether the use of cells and other growth factors could adjust the composition of regenerated tissue and improve vascularity; the latter a major limiting factor for creating larger volumes of tissue.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6928092
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69280922020-01-07 Breast Reconstruction with a Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine Approach (Systematic Review) Donnely, E. Griffin, M. Butler, P. E. Ann Biomed Eng Review Current techniques for breast reconstruction include an autologous-tissue flap or an implant-based procedure, although both can impose further morbidity. This systematic review aims to explore the existing literature on breast reconstruction using a tissue engineering approach; conducted with the databases Medline and Embase. A total of 28 articles were included, mainly comprising of level-5 evidence with in vitro and animal studies focusing on utilizing scaffolds to support the migration and growth of new tissue; scaffolds can be either biological or synthetic. Biological scaffolds were composed of collagen or a decellularized tissue matrix scaffold. Synthetic scaffolds were primarily composed of polymers with customisable designs, adjusting the internal morphology and pore size. Implanting cells, including adipose-derived stem cells, with combined use of basic fibroblast growth factor has been studied in an attempt to enhance tissue regeneration. Lately, a level-4 evidence human case series was reported; successfully regenerating 210 mL of tissue using an arterio-venous pedicled fat flap within a tissue engineering chamber implanted on the chest wall. Further research is required to evaluate whether the use of cells and other growth factors could adjust the composition of regenerated tissue and improve vascularity; the latter a major limiting factor for creating larger volumes of tissue. Springer US 2019-10-01 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC6928092/ /pubmed/31576501 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10439-019-02373-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review
Donnely, E.
Griffin, M.
Butler, P. E.
Breast Reconstruction with a Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine Approach (Systematic Review)
title Breast Reconstruction with a Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine Approach (Systematic Review)
title_full Breast Reconstruction with a Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine Approach (Systematic Review)
title_fullStr Breast Reconstruction with a Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine Approach (Systematic Review)
title_full_unstemmed Breast Reconstruction with a Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine Approach (Systematic Review)
title_short Breast Reconstruction with a Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine Approach (Systematic Review)
title_sort breast reconstruction with a tissue engineering and regenerative medicine approach (systematic review)
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6928092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31576501
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10439-019-02373-3
work_keys_str_mv AT donnelye breastreconstructionwithatissueengineeringandregenerativemedicineapproachsystematicreview
AT griffinm breastreconstructionwithatissueengineeringandregenerativemedicineapproachsystematicreview
AT butlerpe breastreconstructionwithatissueengineeringandregenerativemedicineapproachsystematicreview