Cargando…

Clinical Usefulness of Computational Modeling-Guided Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Updated Outcome of Multicenter Randomized Study

OBJECTIVE: Catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) is still challenging, no optimal extra-pulmonary vein lesion set is known. We previously reported the clinical feasibility of computational modeling-guided AF catheter ablation. METHODS: We randomly assigned 118 patients with persis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, In-Soo, Lim, Byounghyun, Shim, Jaemin, Hwang, Minki, Yu, Hee Tae, Kim, Tae-Hoon, Uhm, Jae-Sun, Kim, Sung-Hwan, Joung, Boyoung, On, Young Keun, Oh, Seil, Oh, Yong-Seog, Nam, Gi-Byung, Lee, Moon-Hyoung, Shim, Eun Bo, Kim, Young-Hoon, Pak, Hui-Nam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6928133/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31920716
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.01512
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: Catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) is still challenging, no optimal extra-pulmonary vein lesion set is known. We previously reported the clinical feasibility of computational modeling-guided AF catheter ablation. METHODS: We randomly assigned 118 patients with persistent AF (77.8% men, age 60.8 ± 9.9 years) to the computational modeling-guided ablation group (53 patients) and the empirical ablation group (55 patients) based on the operators’ experience. For virtual ablation, four virtual linear and one electrogram-guided lesion sets were tested on patient heart computed tomogram-based models, and the lesion set with the fastest termination time was reported to the operator in the modeling-guided ablation group. The primary outcome was freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias lasting longer than 30 s after a single procedure. RESULTS: During 31.5 ± 9.4 months, virtual ablation procedures were available in 95.2% of the patients (108/118). Clinical recurrence rate was significantly lower after a modeling-guided ablation than after an empirical ablation (20.8 vs. 40.0%, log-rank p = 0.042). Modeling-guided ablation was independently associated with a better long-term rhythm outcome of persistent AF ablation (HR = 0.29 [0.12–0.69], p = 0.005). The rhythm outcome of the modeling-guided ablation showed better trends in males, non-obese patients with a less remodeled atrium (left atrial dimension < 50 mm), ejection fraction ≥ 50%, and those without hypertension or diabetes (p < 0.01). There were no significant differences between the groups for the total procedure time (p = 0.403), ablation time (p = 0.510), and major complication rate (p = 0.900). CONCLUSION: Among patients with persistent AF, the computational modeling-guided ablation was superior to the empirical catheter ablation regarding the rhythm outcome. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered with the ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02171364.