Cargando…
Clinical Usefulness of Computational Modeling-Guided Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Updated Outcome of Multicenter Randomized Study
OBJECTIVE: Catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) is still challenging, no optimal extra-pulmonary vein lesion set is known. We previously reported the clinical feasibility of computational modeling-guided AF catheter ablation. METHODS: We randomly assigned 118 patients with persis...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6928133/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31920716 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.01512 |
_version_ | 1783482417544167424 |
---|---|
author | Kim, In-Soo Lim, Byounghyun Shim, Jaemin Hwang, Minki Yu, Hee Tae Kim, Tae-Hoon Uhm, Jae-Sun Kim, Sung-Hwan Joung, Boyoung On, Young Keun Oh, Seil Oh, Yong-Seog Nam, Gi-Byung Lee, Moon-Hyoung Shim, Eun Bo Kim, Young-Hoon Pak, Hui-Nam |
author_facet | Kim, In-Soo Lim, Byounghyun Shim, Jaemin Hwang, Minki Yu, Hee Tae Kim, Tae-Hoon Uhm, Jae-Sun Kim, Sung-Hwan Joung, Boyoung On, Young Keun Oh, Seil Oh, Yong-Seog Nam, Gi-Byung Lee, Moon-Hyoung Shim, Eun Bo Kim, Young-Hoon Pak, Hui-Nam |
author_sort | Kim, In-Soo |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) is still challenging, no optimal extra-pulmonary vein lesion set is known. We previously reported the clinical feasibility of computational modeling-guided AF catheter ablation. METHODS: We randomly assigned 118 patients with persistent AF (77.8% men, age 60.8 ± 9.9 years) to the computational modeling-guided ablation group (53 patients) and the empirical ablation group (55 patients) based on the operators’ experience. For virtual ablation, four virtual linear and one electrogram-guided lesion sets were tested on patient heart computed tomogram-based models, and the lesion set with the fastest termination time was reported to the operator in the modeling-guided ablation group. The primary outcome was freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias lasting longer than 30 s after a single procedure. RESULTS: During 31.5 ± 9.4 months, virtual ablation procedures were available in 95.2% of the patients (108/118). Clinical recurrence rate was significantly lower after a modeling-guided ablation than after an empirical ablation (20.8 vs. 40.0%, log-rank p = 0.042). Modeling-guided ablation was independently associated with a better long-term rhythm outcome of persistent AF ablation (HR = 0.29 [0.12–0.69], p = 0.005). The rhythm outcome of the modeling-guided ablation showed better trends in males, non-obese patients with a less remodeled atrium (left atrial dimension < 50 mm), ejection fraction ≥ 50%, and those without hypertension or diabetes (p < 0.01). There were no significant differences between the groups for the total procedure time (p = 0.403), ablation time (p = 0.510), and major complication rate (p = 0.900). CONCLUSION: Among patients with persistent AF, the computational modeling-guided ablation was superior to the empirical catheter ablation regarding the rhythm outcome. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered with the ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02171364. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6928133 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69281332020-01-09 Clinical Usefulness of Computational Modeling-Guided Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Updated Outcome of Multicenter Randomized Study Kim, In-Soo Lim, Byounghyun Shim, Jaemin Hwang, Minki Yu, Hee Tae Kim, Tae-Hoon Uhm, Jae-Sun Kim, Sung-Hwan Joung, Boyoung On, Young Keun Oh, Seil Oh, Yong-Seog Nam, Gi-Byung Lee, Moon-Hyoung Shim, Eun Bo Kim, Young-Hoon Pak, Hui-Nam Front Physiol Physiology OBJECTIVE: Catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) is still challenging, no optimal extra-pulmonary vein lesion set is known. We previously reported the clinical feasibility of computational modeling-guided AF catheter ablation. METHODS: We randomly assigned 118 patients with persistent AF (77.8% men, age 60.8 ± 9.9 years) to the computational modeling-guided ablation group (53 patients) and the empirical ablation group (55 patients) based on the operators’ experience. For virtual ablation, four virtual linear and one electrogram-guided lesion sets were tested on patient heart computed tomogram-based models, and the lesion set with the fastest termination time was reported to the operator in the modeling-guided ablation group. The primary outcome was freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias lasting longer than 30 s after a single procedure. RESULTS: During 31.5 ± 9.4 months, virtual ablation procedures were available in 95.2% of the patients (108/118). Clinical recurrence rate was significantly lower after a modeling-guided ablation than after an empirical ablation (20.8 vs. 40.0%, log-rank p = 0.042). Modeling-guided ablation was independently associated with a better long-term rhythm outcome of persistent AF ablation (HR = 0.29 [0.12–0.69], p = 0.005). The rhythm outcome of the modeling-guided ablation showed better trends in males, non-obese patients with a less remodeled atrium (left atrial dimension < 50 mm), ejection fraction ≥ 50%, and those without hypertension or diabetes (p < 0.01). There were no significant differences between the groups for the total procedure time (p = 0.403), ablation time (p = 0.510), and major complication rate (p = 0.900). CONCLUSION: Among patients with persistent AF, the computational modeling-guided ablation was superior to the empirical catheter ablation regarding the rhythm outcome. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered with the ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02171364. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6928133/ /pubmed/31920716 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.01512 Text en Copyright © 2019 Kim, Lim, Shim, Hwang, Yu, Kim, Uhm, Kim, Joung, On, Oh, Oh, Nam, Lee, Shim, Kim and Pak. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Physiology Kim, In-Soo Lim, Byounghyun Shim, Jaemin Hwang, Minki Yu, Hee Tae Kim, Tae-Hoon Uhm, Jae-Sun Kim, Sung-Hwan Joung, Boyoung On, Young Keun Oh, Seil Oh, Yong-Seog Nam, Gi-Byung Lee, Moon-Hyoung Shim, Eun Bo Kim, Young-Hoon Pak, Hui-Nam Clinical Usefulness of Computational Modeling-Guided Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Updated Outcome of Multicenter Randomized Study |
title | Clinical Usefulness of Computational Modeling-Guided Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Updated Outcome of Multicenter Randomized Study |
title_full | Clinical Usefulness of Computational Modeling-Guided Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Updated Outcome of Multicenter Randomized Study |
title_fullStr | Clinical Usefulness of Computational Modeling-Guided Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Updated Outcome of Multicenter Randomized Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical Usefulness of Computational Modeling-Guided Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Updated Outcome of Multicenter Randomized Study |
title_short | Clinical Usefulness of Computational Modeling-Guided Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Updated Outcome of Multicenter Randomized Study |
title_sort | clinical usefulness of computational modeling-guided persistent atrial fibrillation ablation: updated outcome of multicenter randomized study |
topic | Physiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6928133/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31920716 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.01512 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kiminsoo clinicalusefulnessofcomputationalmodelingguidedpersistentatrialfibrillationablationupdatedoutcomeofmulticenterrandomizedstudy AT limbyounghyun clinicalusefulnessofcomputationalmodelingguidedpersistentatrialfibrillationablationupdatedoutcomeofmulticenterrandomizedstudy AT shimjaemin clinicalusefulnessofcomputationalmodelingguidedpersistentatrialfibrillationablationupdatedoutcomeofmulticenterrandomizedstudy AT hwangminki clinicalusefulnessofcomputationalmodelingguidedpersistentatrialfibrillationablationupdatedoutcomeofmulticenterrandomizedstudy AT yuheetae clinicalusefulnessofcomputationalmodelingguidedpersistentatrialfibrillationablationupdatedoutcomeofmulticenterrandomizedstudy AT kimtaehoon clinicalusefulnessofcomputationalmodelingguidedpersistentatrialfibrillationablationupdatedoutcomeofmulticenterrandomizedstudy AT uhmjaesun clinicalusefulnessofcomputationalmodelingguidedpersistentatrialfibrillationablationupdatedoutcomeofmulticenterrandomizedstudy AT kimsunghwan clinicalusefulnessofcomputationalmodelingguidedpersistentatrialfibrillationablationupdatedoutcomeofmulticenterrandomizedstudy AT joungboyoung clinicalusefulnessofcomputationalmodelingguidedpersistentatrialfibrillationablationupdatedoutcomeofmulticenterrandomizedstudy AT onyoungkeun clinicalusefulnessofcomputationalmodelingguidedpersistentatrialfibrillationablationupdatedoutcomeofmulticenterrandomizedstudy AT ohseil clinicalusefulnessofcomputationalmodelingguidedpersistentatrialfibrillationablationupdatedoutcomeofmulticenterrandomizedstudy AT ohyongseog clinicalusefulnessofcomputationalmodelingguidedpersistentatrialfibrillationablationupdatedoutcomeofmulticenterrandomizedstudy AT namgibyung clinicalusefulnessofcomputationalmodelingguidedpersistentatrialfibrillationablationupdatedoutcomeofmulticenterrandomizedstudy AT leemoonhyoung clinicalusefulnessofcomputationalmodelingguidedpersistentatrialfibrillationablationupdatedoutcomeofmulticenterrandomizedstudy AT shimeunbo clinicalusefulnessofcomputationalmodelingguidedpersistentatrialfibrillationablationupdatedoutcomeofmulticenterrandomizedstudy AT kimyounghoon clinicalusefulnessofcomputationalmodelingguidedpersistentatrialfibrillationablationupdatedoutcomeofmulticenterrandomizedstudy AT pakhuinam clinicalusefulnessofcomputationalmodelingguidedpersistentatrialfibrillationablationupdatedoutcomeofmulticenterrandomizedstudy AT clinicalusefulnessofcomputationalmodelingguidedpersistentatrialfibrillationablationupdatedoutcomeofmulticenterrandomizedstudy |