Cargando…

Clinical Usefulness of Computational Modeling-Guided Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Updated Outcome of Multicenter Randomized Study

OBJECTIVE: Catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) is still challenging, no optimal extra-pulmonary vein lesion set is known. We previously reported the clinical feasibility of computational modeling-guided AF catheter ablation. METHODS: We randomly assigned 118 patients with persis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, In-Soo, Lim, Byounghyun, Shim, Jaemin, Hwang, Minki, Yu, Hee Tae, Kim, Tae-Hoon, Uhm, Jae-Sun, Kim, Sung-Hwan, Joung, Boyoung, On, Young Keun, Oh, Seil, Oh, Yong-Seog, Nam, Gi-Byung, Lee, Moon-Hyoung, Shim, Eun Bo, Kim, Young-Hoon, Pak, Hui-Nam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6928133/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31920716
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.01512
_version_ 1783482417544167424
author Kim, In-Soo
Lim, Byounghyun
Shim, Jaemin
Hwang, Minki
Yu, Hee Tae
Kim, Tae-Hoon
Uhm, Jae-Sun
Kim, Sung-Hwan
Joung, Boyoung
On, Young Keun
Oh, Seil
Oh, Yong-Seog
Nam, Gi-Byung
Lee, Moon-Hyoung
Shim, Eun Bo
Kim, Young-Hoon
Pak, Hui-Nam
author_facet Kim, In-Soo
Lim, Byounghyun
Shim, Jaemin
Hwang, Minki
Yu, Hee Tae
Kim, Tae-Hoon
Uhm, Jae-Sun
Kim, Sung-Hwan
Joung, Boyoung
On, Young Keun
Oh, Seil
Oh, Yong-Seog
Nam, Gi-Byung
Lee, Moon-Hyoung
Shim, Eun Bo
Kim, Young-Hoon
Pak, Hui-Nam
author_sort Kim, In-Soo
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) is still challenging, no optimal extra-pulmonary vein lesion set is known. We previously reported the clinical feasibility of computational modeling-guided AF catheter ablation. METHODS: We randomly assigned 118 patients with persistent AF (77.8% men, age 60.8 ± 9.9 years) to the computational modeling-guided ablation group (53 patients) and the empirical ablation group (55 patients) based on the operators’ experience. For virtual ablation, four virtual linear and one electrogram-guided lesion sets were tested on patient heart computed tomogram-based models, and the lesion set with the fastest termination time was reported to the operator in the modeling-guided ablation group. The primary outcome was freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias lasting longer than 30 s after a single procedure. RESULTS: During 31.5 ± 9.4 months, virtual ablation procedures were available in 95.2% of the patients (108/118). Clinical recurrence rate was significantly lower after a modeling-guided ablation than after an empirical ablation (20.8 vs. 40.0%, log-rank p = 0.042). Modeling-guided ablation was independently associated with a better long-term rhythm outcome of persistent AF ablation (HR = 0.29 [0.12–0.69], p = 0.005). The rhythm outcome of the modeling-guided ablation showed better trends in males, non-obese patients with a less remodeled atrium (left atrial dimension < 50 mm), ejection fraction ≥ 50%, and those without hypertension or diabetes (p < 0.01). There were no significant differences between the groups for the total procedure time (p = 0.403), ablation time (p = 0.510), and major complication rate (p = 0.900). CONCLUSION: Among patients with persistent AF, the computational modeling-guided ablation was superior to the empirical catheter ablation regarding the rhythm outcome. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered with the ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02171364.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6928133
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69281332020-01-09 Clinical Usefulness of Computational Modeling-Guided Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Updated Outcome of Multicenter Randomized Study Kim, In-Soo Lim, Byounghyun Shim, Jaemin Hwang, Minki Yu, Hee Tae Kim, Tae-Hoon Uhm, Jae-Sun Kim, Sung-Hwan Joung, Boyoung On, Young Keun Oh, Seil Oh, Yong-Seog Nam, Gi-Byung Lee, Moon-Hyoung Shim, Eun Bo Kim, Young-Hoon Pak, Hui-Nam Front Physiol Physiology OBJECTIVE: Catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) is still challenging, no optimal extra-pulmonary vein lesion set is known. We previously reported the clinical feasibility of computational modeling-guided AF catheter ablation. METHODS: We randomly assigned 118 patients with persistent AF (77.8% men, age 60.8 ± 9.9 years) to the computational modeling-guided ablation group (53 patients) and the empirical ablation group (55 patients) based on the operators’ experience. For virtual ablation, four virtual linear and one electrogram-guided lesion sets were tested on patient heart computed tomogram-based models, and the lesion set with the fastest termination time was reported to the operator in the modeling-guided ablation group. The primary outcome was freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias lasting longer than 30 s after a single procedure. RESULTS: During 31.5 ± 9.4 months, virtual ablation procedures were available in 95.2% of the patients (108/118). Clinical recurrence rate was significantly lower after a modeling-guided ablation than after an empirical ablation (20.8 vs. 40.0%, log-rank p = 0.042). Modeling-guided ablation was independently associated with a better long-term rhythm outcome of persistent AF ablation (HR = 0.29 [0.12–0.69], p = 0.005). The rhythm outcome of the modeling-guided ablation showed better trends in males, non-obese patients with a less remodeled atrium (left atrial dimension < 50 mm), ejection fraction ≥ 50%, and those without hypertension or diabetes (p < 0.01). There were no significant differences between the groups for the total procedure time (p = 0.403), ablation time (p = 0.510), and major complication rate (p = 0.900). CONCLUSION: Among patients with persistent AF, the computational modeling-guided ablation was superior to the empirical catheter ablation regarding the rhythm outcome. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered with the ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02171364. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6928133/ /pubmed/31920716 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.01512 Text en Copyright © 2019 Kim, Lim, Shim, Hwang, Yu, Kim, Uhm, Kim, Joung, On, Oh, Oh, Nam, Lee, Shim, Kim and Pak. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Kim, In-Soo
Lim, Byounghyun
Shim, Jaemin
Hwang, Minki
Yu, Hee Tae
Kim, Tae-Hoon
Uhm, Jae-Sun
Kim, Sung-Hwan
Joung, Boyoung
On, Young Keun
Oh, Seil
Oh, Yong-Seog
Nam, Gi-Byung
Lee, Moon-Hyoung
Shim, Eun Bo
Kim, Young-Hoon
Pak, Hui-Nam
Clinical Usefulness of Computational Modeling-Guided Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Updated Outcome of Multicenter Randomized Study
title Clinical Usefulness of Computational Modeling-Guided Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Updated Outcome of Multicenter Randomized Study
title_full Clinical Usefulness of Computational Modeling-Guided Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Updated Outcome of Multicenter Randomized Study
title_fullStr Clinical Usefulness of Computational Modeling-Guided Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Updated Outcome of Multicenter Randomized Study
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Usefulness of Computational Modeling-Guided Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Updated Outcome of Multicenter Randomized Study
title_short Clinical Usefulness of Computational Modeling-Guided Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Updated Outcome of Multicenter Randomized Study
title_sort clinical usefulness of computational modeling-guided persistent atrial fibrillation ablation: updated outcome of multicenter randomized study
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6928133/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31920716
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.01512
work_keys_str_mv AT kiminsoo clinicalusefulnessofcomputationalmodelingguidedpersistentatrialfibrillationablationupdatedoutcomeofmulticenterrandomizedstudy
AT limbyounghyun clinicalusefulnessofcomputationalmodelingguidedpersistentatrialfibrillationablationupdatedoutcomeofmulticenterrandomizedstudy
AT shimjaemin clinicalusefulnessofcomputationalmodelingguidedpersistentatrialfibrillationablationupdatedoutcomeofmulticenterrandomizedstudy
AT hwangminki clinicalusefulnessofcomputationalmodelingguidedpersistentatrialfibrillationablationupdatedoutcomeofmulticenterrandomizedstudy
AT yuheetae clinicalusefulnessofcomputationalmodelingguidedpersistentatrialfibrillationablationupdatedoutcomeofmulticenterrandomizedstudy
AT kimtaehoon clinicalusefulnessofcomputationalmodelingguidedpersistentatrialfibrillationablationupdatedoutcomeofmulticenterrandomizedstudy
AT uhmjaesun clinicalusefulnessofcomputationalmodelingguidedpersistentatrialfibrillationablationupdatedoutcomeofmulticenterrandomizedstudy
AT kimsunghwan clinicalusefulnessofcomputationalmodelingguidedpersistentatrialfibrillationablationupdatedoutcomeofmulticenterrandomizedstudy
AT joungboyoung clinicalusefulnessofcomputationalmodelingguidedpersistentatrialfibrillationablationupdatedoutcomeofmulticenterrandomizedstudy
AT onyoungkeun clinicalusefulnessofcomputationalmodelingguidedpersistentatrialfibrillationablationupdatedoutcomeofmulticenterrandomizedstudy
AT ohseil clinicalusefulnessofcomputationalmodelingguidedpersistentatrialfibrillationablationupdatedoutcomeofmulticenterrandomizedstudy
AT ohyongseog clinicalusefulnessofcomputationalmodelingguidedpersistentatrialfibrillationablationupdatedoutcomeofmulticenterrandomizedstudy
AT namgibyung clinicalusefulnessofcomputationalmodelingguidedpersistentatrialfibrillationablationupdatedoutcomeofmulticenterrandomizedstudy
AT leemoonhyoung clinicalusefulnessofcomputationalmodelingguidedpersistentatrialfibrillationablationupdatedoutcomeofmulticenterrandomizedstudy
AT shimeunbo clinicalusefulnessofcomputationalmodelingguidedpersistentatrialfibrillationablationupdatedoutcomeofmulticenterrandomizedstudy
AT kimyounghoon clinicalusefulnessofcomputationalmodelingguidedpersistentatrialfibrillationablationupdatedoutcomeofmulticenterrandomizedstudy
AT pakhuinam clinicalusefulnessofcomputationalmodelingguidedpersistentatrialfibrillationablationupdatedoutcomeofmulticenterrandomizedstudy
AT clinicalusefulnessofcomputationalmodelingguidedpersistentatrialfibrillationablationupdatedoutcomeofmulticenterrandomizedstudy