Cargando…

The iReAct study – A biopsychosocial analysis of the individual response to physical activity

BACKGROUND: Physical activity is a substantial promoter for health and well-being. Yet, while an increasing number of studies shows that the responsiveness to physical activity is highly individual, most studies focus this issue from only one perspective and neglect other contributing aspects. In re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thiel, Ansgar, Sudeck, Gorden, Gropper, Hannes, Maturana, Felipe Mattioni, Schubert, Tanja, Srismith, Duangkamol, Widmann, Manuel, Behrens, Simone, Martus, Peter, Munz, Barbara, Giel, Katrin, Zipfel, Stephan, Nieß, Andreas Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6928277/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31890988
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100508
_version_ 1783482450365644800
author Thiel, Ansgar
Sudeck, Gorden
Gropper, Hannes
Maturana, Felipe Mattioni
Schubert, Tanja
Srismith, Duangkamol
Widmann, Manuel
Behrens, Simone
Martus, Peter
Munz, Barbara
Giel, Katrin
Zipfel, Stephan
Nieß, Andreas Michael
author_facet Thiel, Ansgar
Sudeck, Gorden
Gropper, Hannes
Maturana, Felipe Mattioni
Schubert, Tanja
Srismith, Duangkamol
Widmann, Manuel
Behrens, Simone
Martus, Peter
Munz, Barbara
Giel, Katrin
Zipfel, Stephan
Nieß, Andreas Michael
author_sort Thiel, Ansgar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Physical activity is a substantial promoter for health and well-being. Yet, while an increasing number of studies shows that the responsiveness to physical activity is highly individual, most studies focus this issue from only one perspective and neglect other contributing aspects. In reference to a biopsychosocial framework, the goal of our study is to examine how physically inactive individuals respond to two distinct standardized endurance trainings on various levels. Based on an assessment of activity- and health-related biographical experiences across the life course, our mixed-method study analyzes the responsiveness to physical activity in the form of a transdisciplinary approach, considering physiological, epigenetic, motivational, affective, and body image-related aspects. METHODS: Participants are randomly assigned to two different training programs (High Intensity Interval Training vs. Moderate Intensity Continuous Training) for six weeks. After this first training period, participants switch training modes according to a two-period sequential-training-intervention (STI) design and train for another six weeks. In order to analyse baseline characteristics as well as acute and adaptive biopsychosocial responses, three extensive mixed-methods diagnostic blocks take place at the beginning (t(0)) of the study and after the first (t(1)) and the second (t(2)) training period resulting in a net follow-up time of 15 weeks. The study is divided into five modules in order to cover a wide array of perspectives. DISCUSSION: The study's transdisciplinary mixed-method design allows to interlace a multitude of subjective and objective data and therefore to draw an integrated picture of the biopsychosocial efficacy of two distinct physical activity programs. The results of our study can be expected to contribute to the development and design of individualised training programs for the promotion of physical activity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was retrospectively registered in the German Clinical Trials Register on 12 June 2019 (DRKS00017446).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6928277
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69282772019-12-30 The iReAct study – A biopsychosocial analysis of the individual response to physical activity Thiel, Ansgar Sudeck, Gorden Gropper, Hannes Maturana, Felipe Mattioni Schubert, Tanja Srismith, Duangkamol Widmann, Manuel Behrens, Simone Martus, Peter Munz, Barbara Giel, Katrin Zipfel, Stephan Nieß, Andreas Michael Contemp Clin Trials Commun Article BACKGROUND: Physical activity is a substantial promoter for health and well-being. Yet, while an increasing number of studies shows that the responsiveness to physical activity is highly individual, most studies focus this issue from only one perspective and neglect other contributing aspects. In reference to a biopsychosocial framework, the goal of our study is to examine how physically inactive individuals respond to two distinct standardized endurance trainings on various levels. Based on an assessment of activity- and health-related biographical experiences across the life course, our mixed-method study analyzes the responsiveness to physical activity in the form of a transdisciplinary approach, considering physiological, epigenetic, motivational, affective, and body image-related aspects. METHODS: Participants are randomly assigned to two different training programs (High Intensity Interval Training vs. Moderate Intensity Continuous Training) for six weeks. After this first training period, participants switch training modes according to a two-period sequential-training-intervention (STI) design and train for another six weeks. In order to analyse baseline characteristics as well as acute and adaptive biopsychosocial responses, three extensive mixed-methods diagnostic blocks take place at the beginning (t(0)) of the study and after the first (t(1)) and the second (t(2)) training period resulting in a net follow-up time of 15 weeks. The study is divided into five modules in order to cover a wide array of perspectives. DISCUSSION: The study's transdisciplinary mixed-method design allows to interlace a multitude of subjective and objective data and therefore to draw an integrated picture of the biopsychosocial efficacy of two distinct physical activity programs. The results of our study can be expected to contribute to the development and design of individualised training programs for the promotion of physical activity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was retrospectively registered in the German Clinical Trials Register on 12 June 2019 (DRKS00017446). Elsevier 2019-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6928277/ /pubmed/31890988 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100508 Text en © 2019 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Thiel, Ansgar
Sudeck, Gorden
Gropper, Hannes
Maturana, Felipe Mattioni
Schubert, Tanja
Srismith, Duangkamol
Widmann, Manuel
Behrens, Simone
Martus, Peter
Munz, Barbara
Giel, Katrin
Zipfel, Stephan
Nieß, Andreas Michael
The iReAct study – A biopsychosocial analysis of the individual response to physical activity
title The iReAct study – A biopsychosocial analysis of the individual response to physical activity
title_full The iReAct study – A biopsychosocial analysis of the individual response to physical activity
title_fullStr The iReAct study – A biopsychosocial analysis of the individual response to physical activity
title_full_unstemmed The iReAct study – A biopsychosocial analysis of the individual response to physical activity
title_short The iReAct study – A biopsychosocial analysis of the individual response to physical activity
title_sort ireact study – a biopsychosocial analysis of the individual response to physical activity
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6928277/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31890988
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100508
work_keys_str_mv AT thielansgar theireactstudyabiopsychosocialanalysisoftheindividualresponsetophysicalactivity
AT sudeckgorden theireactstudyabiopsychosocialanalysisoftheindividualresponsetophysicalactivity
AT gropperhannes theireactstudyabiopsychosocialanalysisoftheindividualresponsetophysicalactivity
AT maturanafelipemattioni theireactstudyabiopsychosocialanalysisoftheindividualresponsetophysicalactivity
AT schuberttanja theireactstudyabiopsychosocialanalysisoftheindividualresponsetophysicalactivity
AT srismithduangkamol theireactstudyabiopsychosocialanalysisoftheindividualresponsetophysicalactivity
AT widmannmanuel theireactstudyabiopsychosocialanalysisoftheindividualresponsetophysicalactivity
AT behrenssimone theireactstudyabiopsychosocialanalysisoftheindividualresponsetophysicalactivity
AT martuspeter theireactstudyabiopsychosocialanalysisoftheindividualresponsetophysicalactivity
AT munzbarbara theireactstudyabiopsychosocialanalysisoftheindividualresponsetophysicalactivity
AT gielkatrin theireactstudyabiopsychosocialanalysisoftheindividualresponsetophysicalactivity
AT zipfelstephan theireactstudyabiopsychosocialanalysisoftheindividualresponsetophysicalactivity
AT nießandreasmichael theireactstudyabiopsychosocialanalysisoftheindividualresponsetophysicalactivity
AT theireactstudyabiopsychosocialanalysisoftheindividualresponsetophysicalactivity
AT thielansgar ireactstudyabiopsychosocialanalysisoftheindividualresponsetophysicalactivity
AT sudeckgorden ireactstudyabiopsychosocialanalysisoftheindividualresponsetophysicalactivity
AT gropperhannes ireactstudyabiopsychosocialanalysisoftheindividualresponsetophysicalactivity
AT maturanafelipemattioni ireactstudyabiopsychosocialanalysisoftheindividualresponsetophysicalactivity
AT schuberttanja ireactstudyabiopsychosocialanalysisoftheindividualresponsetophysicalactivity
AT srismithduangkamol ireactstudyabiopsychosocialanalysisoftheindividualresponsetophysicalactivity
AT widmannmanuel ireactstudyabiopsychosocialanalysisoftheindividualresponsetophysicalactivity
AT behrenssimone ireactstudyabiopsychosocialanalysisoftheindividualresponsetophysicalactivity
AT martuspeter ireactstudyabiopsychosocialanalysisoftheindividualresponsetophysicalactivity
AT munzbarbara ireactstudyabiopsychosocialanalysisoftheindividualresponsetophysicalactivity
AT gielkatrin ireactstudyabiopsychosocialanalysisoftheindividualresponsetophysicalactivity
AT zipfelstephan ireactstudyabiopsychosocialanalysisoftheindividualresponsetophysicalactivity
AT nießandreasmichael ireactstudyabiopsychosocialanalysisoftheindividualresponsetophysicalactivity
AT ireactstudyabiopsychosocialanalysisoftheindividualresponsetophysicalactivity