Cargando…

Quantitative comparison of frequency-domain and delay-and-sum optoacoustic image reconstruction including the effect of coherence factor weighting

Image reconstruction in optoacoustic imaging is often based on a delay-and-sum (DAS) or a frequency domain (FD) algorithm. In this study, we performed a comprehensive comparison of these two algorithms together with coherence factor (CF) weighting using phantom and in-vivo mouse data obtained with o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Spadin, Florentin, Jaeger, Michael, Nuster, Robert, Subochev, Pavel, Frenz, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6928282/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31890564
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pacs.2019.100149
_version_ 1783482451549487104
author Spadin, Florentin
Jaeger, Michael
Nuster, Robert
Subochev, Pavel
Frenz, Martin
author_facet Spadin, Florentin
Jaeger, Michael
Nuster, Robert
Subochev, Pavel
Frenz, Martin
author_sort Spadin, Florentin
collection PubMed
description Image reconstruction in optoacoustic imaging is often based on a delay-and-sum (DAS) or a frequency domain (FD) algorithm. In this study, we performed a comprehensive comparison of these two algorithms together with coherence factor (CF) weighting using phantom and in-vivo mouse data obtained with optoacoustic microscopy. For this purpose we developed an FD based definition of the CF. Our results reveal the equivalence of DAS and FD, with and without CF weighting, in terms of spatial resolution and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) but highlight the clear advantage of FD in terms of computational cost, making it preferable for 3D reconstruction or real-time applications. An important additional result of this research is that, contradictory to previous studies, CF weighting does not lead to any improvement in lateral resolution.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6928282
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69282822019-12-30 Quantitative comparison of frequency-domain and delay-and-sum optoacoustic image reconstruction including the effect of coherence factor weighting Spadin, Florentin Jaeger, Michael Nuster, Robert Subochev, Pavel Frenz, Martin Photoacoustics Research Article Image reconstruction in optoacoustic imaging is often based on a delay-and-sum (DAS) or a frequency domain (FD) algorithm. In this study, we performed a comprehensive comparison of these two algorithms together with coherence factor (CF) weighting using phantom and in-vivo mouse data obtained with optoacoustic microscopy. For this purpose we developed an FD based definition of the CF. Our results reveal the equivalence of DAS and FD, with and without CF weighting, in terms of spatial resolution and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) but highlight the clear advantage of FD in terms of computational cost, making it preferable for 3D reconstruction or real-time applications. An important additional result of this research is that, contradictory to previous studies, CF weighting does not lead to any improvement in lateral resolution. Elsevier 2019-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6928282/ /pubmed/31890564 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pacs.2019.100149 Text en © 2019 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Spadin, Florentin
Jaeger, Michael
Nuster, Robert
Subochev, Pavel
Frenz, Martin
Quantitative comparison of frequency-domain and delay-and-sum optoacoustic image reconstruction including the effect of coherence factor weighting
title Quantitative comparison of frequency-domain and delay-and-sum optoacoustic image reconstruction including the effect of coherence factor weighting
title_full Quantitative comparison of frequency-domain and delay-and-sum optoacoustic image reconstruction including the effect of coherence factor weighting
title_fullStr Quantitative comparison of frequency-domain and delay-and-sum optoacoustic image reconstruction including the effect of coherence factor weighting
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative comparison of frequency-domain and delay-and-sum optoacoustic image reconstruction including the effect of coherence factor weighting
title_short Quantitative comparison of frequency-domain and delay-and-sum optoacoustic image reconstruction including the effect of coherence factor weighting
title_sort quantitative comparison of frequency-domain and delay-and-sum optoacoustic image reconstruction including the effect of coherence factor weighting
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6928282/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31890564
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pacs.2019.100149
work_keys_str_mv AT spadinflorentin quantitativecomparisonoffrequencydomainanddelayandsumoptoacousticimagereconstructionincludingtheeffectofcoherencefactorweighting
AT jaegermichael quantitativecomparisonoffrequencydomainanddelayandsumoptoacousticimagereconstructionincludingtheeffectofcoherencefactorweighting
AT nusterrobert quantitativecomparisonoffrequencydomainanddelayandsumoptoacousticimagereconstructionincludingtheeffectofcoherencefactorweighting
AT subochevpavel quantitativecomparisonoffrequencydomainanddelayandsumoptoacousticimagereconstructionincludingtheeffectofcoherencefactorweighting
AT frenzmartin quantitativecomparisonoffrequencydomainanddelayandsumoptoacousticimagereconstructionincludingtheeffectofcoherencefactorweighting