Cargando…
Segmentation of carotid arterial walls using neural networks
BACKGROUND: Automated, accurate, objective, and quantitative medical image segmentation has remained a challenging goal in computer science since its inception. This study applies the technique of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to the task of segmenting carotid arteries to aid in the assessmen...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6928332/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31988700 http://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v12.i1.1 |
_version_ | 1783482462709481472 |
---|---|
author | Samber, Daniel D Ramachandran, Sarayu Sahota, Anoop Naidu, Sonum Pruzan, Alison Fayad, Zahi A Mani, Venkatesh |
author_facet | Samber, Daniel D Ramachandran, Sarayu Sahota, Anoop Naidu, Sonum Pruzan, Alison Fayad, Zahi A Mani, Venkatesh |
author_sort | Samber, Daniel D |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Automated, accurate, objective, and quantitative medical image segmentation has remained a challenging goal in computer science since its inception. This study applies the technique of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to the task of segmenting carotid arteries to aid in the assessment of pathology. AIM: To investigate CNN’s utility as an ancillary tool for researchers who require accurate segmentation of carotid vessels. METHODS: An expert reader delineated vessel wall boundaries on 4422 axial T2-weighted magnetic resonance images of bilateral carotid arteries from 189 subjects with clinically evident atherosclerotic disease. A portion of this dataset was used to train two CNNs (one to segment the vessel lumen and the other to segment the vessel wall) with the remaining portion used to test the algorithm’s efficacy by comparing CNN segmented images with those of an expert reader. RESULTS: Overall quantitative assessment between automated and manual segmentations was determined by computing the DICE coefficient for each pair of segmented images in the test dataset for each CNN applied. The average DICE coefficient for the test dataset (CNN segmentations compared to expert’s segmentations) was 0.96 for the lumen and 0.87 for the vessel wall. Pearson correlation values and the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) were computed for the lumen (Pearson = 0.98, ICC = 0.98) and vessel wall (Pearson = 0.88, ICC = 0.86) segmentations. Bland-Altman plots of area measurements for the CNN and expert readers indicate good agreement with a mean bias of 1%-8%. CONCLUSION: Although the technique produces reasonable results that are on par with expert human assessments, our application requires human supervision and monitoring to ensure consistent results. We intend to deploy this algorithm as part of a software platform to lessen researchers’ workload to more quickly obtain reliable results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6928332 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Baishideng Publishing Group Inc |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69283322020-01-28 Segmentation of carotid arterial walls using neural networks Samber, Daniel D Ramachandran, Sarayu Sahota, Anoop Naidu, Sonum Pruzan, Alison Fayad, Zahi A Mani, Venkatesh World J Radiol Observational Study BACKGROUND: Automated, accurate, objective, and quantitative medical image segmentation has remained a challenging goal in computer science since its inception. This study applies the technique of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to the task of segmenting carotid arteries to aid in the assessment of pathology. AIM: To investigate CNN’s utility as an ancillary tool for researchers who require accurate segmentation of carotid vessels. METHODS: An expert reader delineated vessel wall boundaries on 4422 axial T2-weighted magnetic resonance images of bilateral carotid arteries from 189 subjects with clinically evident atherosclerotic disease. A portion of this dataset was used to train two CNNs (one to segment the vessel lumen and the other to segment the vessel wall) with the remaining portion used to test the algorithm’s efficacy by comparing CNN segmented images with those of an expert reader. RESULTS: Overall quantitative assessment between automated and manual segmentations was determined by computing the DICE coefficient for each pair of segmented images in the test dataset for each CNN applied. The average DICE coefficient for the test dataset (CNN segmentations compared to expert’s segmentations) was 0.96 for the lumen and 0.87 for the vessel wall. Pearson correlation values and the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) were computed for the lumen (Pearson = 0.98, ICC = 0.98) and vessel wall (Pearson = 0.88, ICC = 0.86) segmentations. Bland-Altman plots of area measurements for the CNN and expert readers indicate good agreement with a mean bias of 1%-8%. CONCLUSION: Although the technique produces reasonable results that are on par with expert human assessments, our application requires human supervision and monitoring to ensure consistent results. We intend to deploy this algorithm as part of a software platform to lessen researchers’ workload to more quickly obtain reliable results. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2020-01-28 2020-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6928332/ /pubmed/31988700 http://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v12.i1.1 Text en ©The Author(s) 2019. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. |
spellingShingle | Observational Study Samber, Daniel D Ramachandran, Sarayu Sahota, Anoop Naidu, Sonum Pruzan, Alison Fayad, Zahi A Mani, Venkatesh Segmentation of carotid arterial walls using neural networks |
title | Segmentation of carotid arterial walls using neural networks |
title_full | Segmentation of carotid arterial walls using neural networks |
title_fullStr | Segmentation of carotid arterial walls using neural networks |
title_full_unstemmed | Segmentation of carotid arterial walls using neural networks |
title_short | Segmentation of carotid arterial walls using neural networks |
title_sort | segmentation of carotid arterial walls using neural networks |
topic | Observational Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6928332/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31988700 http://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v12.i1.1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT samberdanield segmentationofcarotidarterialwallsusingneuralnetworks AT ramachandransarayu segmentationofcarotidarterialwallsusingneuralnetworks AT sahotaanoop segmentationofcarotidarterialwallsusingneuralnetworks AT naidusonum segmentationofcarotidarterialwallsusingneuralnetworks AT pruzanalison segmentationofcarotidarterialwallsusingneuralnetworks AT fayadzahia segmentationofcarotidarterialwallsusingneuralnetworks AT manivenkatesh segmentationofcarotidarterialwallsusingneuralnetworks |