Cargando…

A Comparative Study of Fault Diagnosis for Train Door System: Traditional versus Deep Learning Approaches

A fault diagnosis of a train door system is carried out using the motor current signal that operates the door. A test rig is prepared, in which various fault modes are examined by applying extreme conditions, as well as the natural and artificial wears of critical components. Two approaches are unde...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ham, Seokju, Han, Seok-Youn, Kim, Seokgoo, Park, Hyung Jun, Park, Kee-Jun, Choi, Joo-Ho
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6928885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31775338
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19235160
_version_ 1783482576147578880
author Ham, Seokju
Han, Seok-Youn
Kim, Seokgoo
Park, Hyung Jun
Park, Kee-Jun
Choi, Joo-Ho
author_facet Ham, Seokju
Han, Seok-Youn
Kim, Seokgoo
Park, Hyung Jun
Park, Kee-Jun
Choi, Joo-Ho
author_sort Ham, Seokju
collection PubMed
description A fault diagnosis of a train door system is carried out using the motor current signal that operates the door. A test rig is prepared, in which various fault modes are examined by applying extreme conditions, as well as the natural and artificial wears of critical components. Two approaches are undertaken toward the fault classification for comparative purposes: one is the traditional feature-based method that requires several steps for the processing features such as signal segmentation, the extraction of time-domain features, selection by Fisher’s discrimination, and K-nearest neighbor. The other is the deep learning approach by employing the convolutional neural network (CNN) to skip the hand-crafted features extraction process. In the traditional approach, good accuracy is found only after the current signal is segmented into the three velocity regimes, which enhances the discrimination capability. In the CNN, superior accuracy is obtained even by the original raw signal, which is more convenient in terms of implementation. However, in view of practical applications, the traditional approach is more useful in that the features processing can be easily applied to assess the health state of each fault and monitor the progression over time in the real operation, which is not enabled by the deep learning approach.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6928885
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69288852019-12-26 A Comparative Study of Fault Diagnosis for Train Door System: Traditional versus Deep Learning Approaches Ham, Seokju Han, Seok-Youn Kim, Seokgoo Park, Hyung Jun Park, Kee-Jun Choi, Joo-Ho Sensors (Basel) Article A fault diagnosis of a train door system is carried out using the motor current signal that operates the door. A test rig is prepared, in which various fault modes are examined by applying extreme conditions, as well as the natural and artificial wears of critical components. Two approaches are undertaken toward the fault classification for comparative purposes: one is the traditional feature-based method that requires several steps for the processing features such as signal segmentation, the extraction of time-domain features, selection by Fisher’s discrimination, and K-nearest neighbor. The other is the deep learning approach by employing the convolutional neural network (CNN) to skip the hand-crafted features extraction process. In the traditional approach, good accuracy is found only after the current signal is segmented into the three velocity regimes, which enhances the discrimination capability. In the CNN, superior accuracy is obtained even by the original raw signal, which is more convenient in terms of implementation. However, in view of practical applications, the traditional approach is more useful in that the features processing can be easily applied to assess the health state of each fault and monitor the progression over time in the real operation, which is not enabled by the deep learning approach. MDPI 2019-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6928885/ /pubmed/31775338 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19235160 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ham, Seokju
Han, Seok-Youn
Kim, Seokgoo
Park, Hyung Jun
Park, Kee-Jun
Choi, Joo-Ho
A Comparative Study of Fault Diagnosis for Train Door System: Traditional versus Deep Learning Approaches
title A Comparative Study of Fault Diagnosis for Train Door System: Traditional versus Deep Learning Approaches
title_full A Comparative Study of Fault Diagnosis for Train Door System: Traditional versus Deep Learning Approaches
title_fullStr A Comparative Study of Fault Diagnosis for Train Door System: Traditional versus Deep Learning Approaches
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Study of Fault Diagnosis for Train Door System: Traditional versus Deep Learning Approaches
title_short A Comparative Study of Fault Diagnosis for Train Door System: Traditional versus Deep Learning Approaches
title_sort comparative study of fault diagnosis for train door system: traditional versus deep learning approaches
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6928885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31775338
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19235160
work_keys_str_mv AT hamseokju acomparativestudyoffaultdiagnosisfortraindoorsystemtraditionalversusdeeplearningapproaches
AT hanseokyoun acomparativestudyoffaultdiagnosisfortraindoorsystemtraditionalversusdeeplearningapproaches
AT kimseokgoo acomparativestudyoffaultdiagnosisfortraindoorsystemtraditionalversusdeeplearningapproaches
AT parkhyungjun acomparativestudyoffaultdiagnosisfortraindoorsystemtraditionalversusdeeplearningapproaches
AT parkkeejun acomparativestudyoffaultdiagnosisfortraindoorsystemtraditionalversusdeeplearningapproaches
AT choijooho acomparativestudyoffaultdiagnosisfortraindoorsystemtraditionalversusdeeplearningapproaches
AT hamseokju comparativestudyoffaultdiagnosisfortraindoorsystemtraditionalversusdeeplearningapproaches
AT hanseokyoun comparativestudyoffaultdiagnosisfortraindoorsystemtraditionalversusdeeplearningapproaches
AT kimseokgoo comparativestudyoffaultdiagnosisfortraindoorsystemtraditionalversusdeeplearningapproaches
AT parkhyungjun comparativestudyoffaultdiagnosisfortraindoorsystemtraditionalversusdeeplearningapproaches
AT parkkeejun comparativestudyoffaultdiagnosisfortraindoorsystemtraditionalversusdeeplearningapproaches
AT choijooho comparativestudyoffaultdiagnosisfortraindoorsystemtraditionalversusdeeplearningapproaches