Cargando…
Crowdsourcing as a Tool for Urban Emergency Management: Lessons from the Literature and Typology
Recently, citizen involvement has been increasingly used in urban disaster prevention and management, taking advantage of new ubiquitous and collaborative technologies. This scenario has created a unique opportunity to leverage the work of crowds of volunteers. As a result, crowdsourcing approaches...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6928978/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31795219 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19235235 |
_version_ | 1783482597911822336 |
---|---|
author | Chaves, Ramon Schneider, Daniel Correia, António Motta, Claudia L. R. Borges, Marcos R. S. |
author_facet | Chaves, Ramon Schneider, Daniel Correia, António Motta, Claudia L. R. Borges, Marcos R. S. |
author_sort | Chaves, Ramon |
collection | PubMed |
description | Recently, citizen involvement has been increasingly used in urban disaster prevention and management, taking advantage of new ubiquitous and collaborative technologies. This scenario has created a unique opportunity to leverage the work of crowds of volunteers. As a result, crowdsourcing approaches for disaster prevention and management have been proposed and evaluated. However, the articulation of citizens, tasks, and outcomes as a continuous flow of knowledge generation reveals a complex ecosystem that requires coordination efforts to manage interdependencies in crowd work. To tackle this challenging problem, this paper extends to the context of urban emergency management the results of a previous study that investigates how crowd work is managed in crowdsourcing platforms applied to urban planning. The goal is to understand how crowdsourcing techniques and quality control dimensions used in urban planning could be used to support urban emergency management, especially in the context of mining-related dam outages. Through a systematic literature review, our study makes a comparison between crowdsourcing tools designed for urban planning and urban emergency management and proposes a five-dimension typology of quality in crowdsourcing, which can be leveraged for optimizing urban planning and emergency management processes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6928978 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69289782019-12-26 Crowdsourcing as a Tool for Urban Emergency Management: Lessons from the Literature and Typology Chaves, Ramon Schneider, Daniel Correia, António Motta, Claudia L. R. Borges, Marcos R. S. Sensors (Basel) Review Recently, citizen involvement has been increasingly used in urban disaster prevention and management, taking advantage of new ubiquitous and collaborative technologies. This scenario has created a unique opportunity to leverage the work of crowds of volunteers. As a result, crowdsourcing approaches for disaster prevention and management have been proposed and evaluated. However, the articulation of citizens, tasks, and outcomes as a continuous flow of knowledge generation reveals a complex ecosystem that requires coordination efforts to manage interdependencies in crowd work. To tackle this challenging problem, this paper extends to the context of urban emergency management the results of a previous study that investigates how crowd work is managed in crowdsourcing platforms applied to urban planning. The goal is to understand how crowdsourcing techniques and quality control dimensions used in urban planning could be used to support urban emergency management, especially in the context of mining-related dam outages. Through a systematic literature review, our study makes a comparison between crowdsourcing tools designed for urban planning and urban emergency management and proposes a five-dimension typology of quality in crowdsourcing, which can be leveraged for optimizing urban planning and emergency management processes. MDPI 2019-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6928978/ /pubmed/31795219 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19235235 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Chaves, Ramon Schneider, Daniel Correia, António Motta, Claudia L. R. Borges, Marcos R. S. Crowdsourcing as a Tool for Urban Emergency Management: Lessons from the Literature and Typology |
title | Crowdsourcing as a Tool for Urban Emergency Management: Lessons from the Literature and Typology |
title_full | Crowdsourcing as a Tool for Urban Emergency Management: Lessons from the Literature and Typology |
title_fullStr | Crowdsourcing as a Tool for Urban Emergency Management: Lessons from the Literature and Typology |
title_full_unstemmed | Crowdsourcing as a Tool for Urban Emergency Management: Lessons from the Literature and Typology |
title_short | Crowdsourcing as a Tool for Urban Emergency Management: Lessons from the Literature and Typology |
title_sort | crowdsourcing as a tool for urban emergency management: lessons from the literature and typology |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6928978/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31795219 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19235235 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chavesramon crowdsourcingasatoolforurbanemergencymanagementlessonsfromtheliteratureandtypology AT schneiderdaniel crowdsourcingasatoolforurbanemergencymanagementlessonsfromtheliteratureandtypology AT correiaantonio crowdsourcingasatoolforurbanemergencymanagementlessonsfromtheliteratureandtypology AT mottaclaudialr crowdsourcingasatoolforurbanemergencymanagementlessonsfromtheliteratureandtypology AT borgesmarcosrs crowdsourcingasatoolforurbanemergencymanagementlessonsfromtheliteratureandtypology |