Cargando…

A Depth-Adaptive Waveform Decomposition Method for Airborne LiDAR Bathymetry

Airborne LiDAR bathymetry (ALB) has shown great potential in shallow water and coastal mapping. However, due to the variability of the waveforms, it is hard to detect the signals from the received waveforms with a single algorithm. This study proposed a depth-adaptive waveform decomposition method t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xing, Shuai, Wang, Dandi, Xu, Qing, Lin, Yuzhun, Li, Pengcheng, Jiao, Lin, Zhang, Xinlei, Liu, Chenbo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6928988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31757030
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19235065
_version_ 1783482600240709632
author Xing, Shuai
Wang, Dandi
Xu, Qing
Lin, Yuzhun
Li, Pengcheng
Jiao, Lin
Zhang, Xinlei
Liu, Chenbo
author_facet Xing, Shuai
Wang, Dandi
Xu, Qing
Lin, Yuzhun
Li, Pengcheng
Jiao, Lin
Zhang, Xinlei
Liu, Chenbo
author_sort Xing, Shuai
collection PubMed
description Airborne LiDAR bathymetry (ALB) has shown great potential in shallow water and coastal mapping. However, due to the variability of the waveforms, it is hard to detect the signals from the received waveforms with a single algorithm. This study proposed a depth-adaptive waveform decomposition method to fit the waveforms of different depths with different models. In the proposed method, waveforms are divided into two categories based on the water depth, labeled as “shallow water (SW)” and “deep water (DW)”. An empirical waveform model (EW) based on the calibration waveform is constructed for SW waveform decomposition which is more suitable than classical models, and an exponential function with second-order polynomial model (EFSP) is proposed for DW waveform decomposition which performs better than the quadrilateral model. In solving the model’s parameters, a trust region algorithm is introduced to improve the probability of convergence. The proposed method is tested on two field datasets and two simulated datasets to assess the accuracy of the water surface detected in the shallow water and water bottom detected in the deep water. The experimental results show that, compared with the traditional methods, the proposed method performs best, with a high signal detection rate (99.11% in shallow water and 74.64% in deep water), low RMSE (0.09 m for water surface and 0.11 m for water bottom) and wide bathymetric range (0.22 m to 40.49 m).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6928988
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69289882019-12-26 A Depth-Adaptive Waveform Decomposition Method for Airborne LiDAR Bathymetry Xing, Shuai Wang, Dandi Xu, Qing Lin, Yuzhun Li, Pengcheng Jiao, Lin Zhang, Xinlei Liu, Chenbo Sensors (Basel) Article Airborne LiDAR bathymetry (ALB) has shown great potential in shallow water and coastal mapping. However, due to the variability of the waveforms, it is hard to detect the signals from the received waveforms with a single algorithm. This study proposed a depth-adaptive waveform decomposition method to fit the waveforms of different depths with different models. In the proposed method, waveforms are divided into two categories based on the water depth, labeled as “shallow water (SW)” and “deep water (DW)”. An empirical waveform model (EW) based on the calibration waveform is constructed for SW waveform decomposition which is more suitable than classical models, and an exponential function with second-order polynomial model (EFSP) is proposed for DW waveform decomposition which performs better than the quadrilateral model. In solving the model’s parameters, a trust region algorithm is introduced to improve the probability of convergence. The proposed method is tested on two field datasets and two simulated datasets to assess the accuracy of the water surface detected in the shallow water and water bottom detected in the deep water. The experimental results show that, compared with the traditional methods, the proposed method performs best, with a high signal detection rate (99.11% in shallow water and 74.64% in deep water), low RMSE (0.09 m for water surface and 0.11 m for water bottom) and wide bathymetric range (0.22 m to 40.49 m). MDPI 2019-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6928988/ /pubmed/31757030 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19235065 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Xing, Shuai
Wang, Dandi
Xu, Qing
Lin, Yuzhun
Li, Pengcheng
Jiao, Lin
Zhang, Xinlei
Liu, Chenbo
A Depth-Adaptive Waveform Decomposition Method for Airborne LiDAR Bathymetry
title A Depth-Adaptive Waveform Decomposition Method for Airborne LiDAR Bathymetry
title_full A Depth-Adaptive Waveform Decomposition Method for Airborne LiDAR Bathymetry
title_fullStr A Depth-Adaptive Waveform Decomposition Method for Airborne LiDAR Bathymetry
title_full_unstemmed A Depth-Adaptive Waveform Decomposition Method for Airborne LiDAR Bathymetry
title_short A Depth-Adaptive Waveform Decomposition Method for Airborne LiDAR Bathymetry
title_sort depth-adaptive waveform decomposition method for airborne lidar bathymetry
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6928988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31757030
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19235065
work_keys_str_mv AT xingshuai adepthadaptivewaveformdecompositionmethodforairbornelidarbathymetry
AT wangdandi adepthadaptivewaveformdecompositionmethodforairbornelidarbathymetry
AT xuqing adepthadaptivewaveformdecompositionmethodforairbornelidarbathymetry
AT linyuzhun adepthadaptivewaveformdecompositionmethodforairbornelidarbathymetry
AT lipengcheng adepthadaptivewaveformdecompositionmethodforairbornelidarbathymetry
AT jiaolin adepthadaptivewaveformdecompositionmethodforairbornelidarbathymetry
AT zhangxinlei adepthadaptivewaveformdecompositionmethodforairbornelidarbathymetry
AT liuchenbo adepthadaptivewaveformdecompositionmethodforairbornelidarbathymetry
AT xingshuai depthadaptivewaveformdecompositionmethodforairbornelidarbathymetry
AT wangdandi depthadaptivewaveformdecompositionmethodforairbornelidarbathymetry
AT xuqing depthadaptivewaveformdecompositionmethodforairbornelidarbathymetry
AT linyuzhun depthadaptivewaveformdecompositionmethodforairbornelidarbathymetry
AT lipengcheng depthadaptivewaveformdecompositionmethodforairbornelidarbathymetry
AT jiaolin depthadaptivewaveformdecompositionmethodforairbornelidarbathymetry
AT zhangxinlei depthadaptivewaveformdecompositionmethodforairbornelidarbathymetry
AT liuchenbo depthadaptivewaveformdecompositionmethodforairbornelidarbathymetry