Cargando…
A Depth-Adaptive Waveform Decomposition Method for Airborne LiDAR Bathymetry
Airborne LiDAR bathymetry (ALB) has shown great potential in shallow water and coastal mapping. However, due to the variability of the waveforms, it is hard to detect the signals from the received waveforms with a single algorithm. This study proposed a depth-adaptive waveform decomposition method t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6928988/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31757030 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19235065 |
_version_ | 1783482600240709632 |
---|---|
author | Xing, Shuai Wang, Dandi Xu, Qing Lin, Yuzhun Li, Pengcheng Jiao, Lin Zhang, Xinlei Liu, Chenbo |
author_facet | Xing, Shuai Wang, Dandi Xu, Qing Lin, Yuzhun Li, Pengcheng Jiao, Lin Zhang, Xinlei Liu, Chenbo |
author_sort | Xing, Shuai |
collection | PubMed |
description | Airborne LiDAR bathymetry (ALB) has shown great potential in shallow water and coastal mapping. However, due to the variability of the waveforms, it is hard to detect the signals from the received waveforms with a single algorithm. This study proposed a depth-adaptive waveform decomposition method to fit the waveforms of different depths with different models. In the proposed method, waveforms are divided into two categories based on the water depth, labeled as “shallow water (SW)” and “deep water (DW)”. An empirical waveform model (EW) based on the calibration waveform is constructed for SW waveform decomposition which is more suitable than classical models, and an exponential function with second-order polynomial model (EFSP) is proposed for DW waveform decomposition which performs better than the quadrilateral model. In solving the model’s parameters, a trust region algorithm is introduced to improve the probability of convergence. The proposed method is tested on two field datasets and two simulated datasets to assess the accuracy of the water surface detected in the shallow water and water bottom detected in the deep water. The experimental results show that, compared with the traditional methods, the proposed method performs best, with a high signal detection rate (99.11% in shallow water and 74.64% in deep water), low RMSE (0.09 m for water surface and 0.11 m for water bottom) and wide bathymetric range (0.22 m to 40.49 m). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6928988 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69289882019-12-26 A Depth-Adaptive Waveform Decomposition Method for Airborne LiDAR Bathymetry Xing, Shuai Wang, Dandi Xu, Qing Lin, Yuzhun Li, Pengcheng Jiao, Lin Zhang, Xinlei Liu, Chenbo Sensors (Basel) Article Airborne LiDAR bathymetry (ALB) has shown great potential in shallow water and coastal mapping. However, due to the variability of the waveforms, it is hard to detect the signals from the received waveforms with a single algorithm. This study proposed a depth-adaptive waveform decomposition method to fit the waveforms of different depths with different models. In the proposed method, waveforms are divided into two categories based on the water depth, labeled as “shallow water (SW)” and “deep water (DW)”. An empirical waveform model (EW) based on the calibration waveform is constructed for SW waveform decomposition which is more suitable than classical models, and an exponential function with second-order polynomial model (EFSP) is proposed for DW waveform decomposition which performs better than the quadrilateral model. In solving the model’s parameters, a trust region algorithm is introduced to improve the probability of convergence. The proposed method is tested on two field datasets and two simulated datasets to assess the accuracy of the water surface detected in the shallow water and water bottom detected in the deep water. The experimental results show that, compared with the traditional methods, the proposed method performs best, with a high signal detection rate (99.11% in shallow water and 74.64% in deep water), low RMSE (0.09 m for water surface and 0.11 m for water bottom) and wide bathymetric range (0.22 m to 40.49 m). MDPI 2019-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6928988/ /pubmed/31757030 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19235065 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Xing, Shuai Wang, Dandi Xu, Qing Lin, Yuzhun Li, Pengcheng Jiao, Lin Zhang, Xinlei Liu, Chenbo A Depth-Adaptive Waveform Decomposition Method for Airborne LiDAR Bathymetry |
title | A Depth-Adaptive Waveform Decomposition Method for Airborne LiDAR Bathymetry |
title_full | A Depth-Adaptive Waveform Decomposition Method for Airborne LiDAR Bathymetry |
title_fullStr | A Depth-Adaptive Waveform Decomposition Method for Airborne LiDAR Bathymetry |
title_full_unstemmed | A Depth-Adaptive Waveform Decomposition Method for Airborne LiDAR Bathymetry |
title_short | A Depth-Adaptive Waveform Decomposition Method for Airborne LiDAR Bathymetry |
title_sort | depth-adaptive waveform decomposition method for airborne lidar bathymetry |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6928988/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31757030 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19235065 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xingshuai adepthadaptivewaveformdecompositionmethodforairbornelidarbathymetry AT wangdandi adepthadaptivewaveformdecompositionmethodforairbornelidarbathymetry AT xuqing adepthadaptivewaveformdecompositionmethodforairbornelidarbathymetry AT linyuzhun adepthadaptivewaveformdecompositionmethodforairbornelidarbathymetry AT lipengcheng adepthadaptivewaveformdecompositionmethodforairbornelidarbathymetry AT jiaolin adepthadaptivewaveformdecompositionmethodforairbornelidarbathymetry AT zhangxinlei adepthadaptivewaveformdecompositionmethodforairbornelidarbathymetry AT liuchenbo adepthadaptivewaveformdecompositionmethodforairbornelidarbathymetry AT xingshuai depthadaptivewaveformdecompositionmethodforairbornelidarbathymetry AT wangdandi depthadaptivewaveformdecompositionmethodforairbornelidarbathymetry AT xuqing depthadaptivewaveformdecompositionmethodforairbornelidarbathymetry AT linyuzhun depthadaptivewaveformdecompositionmethodforairbornelidarbathymetry AT lipengcheng depthadaptivewaveformdecompositionmethodforairbornelidarbathymetry AT jiaolin depthadaptivewaveformdecompositionmethodforairbornelidarbathymetry AT zhangxinlei depthadaptivewaveformdecompositionmethodforairbornelidarbathymetry AT liuchenbo depthadaptivewaveformdecompositionmethodforairbornelidarbathymetry |