Cargando…
Evaluation of the Major Steps in the Conventional Protocol for the Alkaline Comet Assay
Single cell gel electrophoresis, also known as the comet assay, has become a widespread DNA damage assessment tool due to its sensitivity, adaptability, low cost, ease of use, and reliability. Despite these benefits, this assay has shortcomings, such as long assay running time, the manipulation of m...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6929057/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31810189 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms20236072 |
_version_ | 1783482616380391424 |
---|---|
author | Karbaschi, Mahsa Ji, Yunhee Abdulwahed, Abdulhadi Mohammed S. Alohaly, Alhanoof Bedoya, Juan F. Burke, Shanna L. Boulos, Thomas M. Tempest, Helen G. Cooke, Marcus S. |
author_facet | Karbaschi, Mahsa Ji, Yunhee Abdulwahed, Abdulhadi Mohammed S. Alohaly, Alhanoof Bedoya, Juan F. Burke, Shanna L. Boulos, Thomas M. Tempest, Helen G. Cooke, Marcus S. |
author_sort | Karbaschi, Mahsa |
collection | PubMed |
description | Single cell gel electrophoresis, also known as the comet assay, has become a widespread DNA damage assessment tool due to its sensitivity, adaptability, low cost, ease of use, and reliability. Despite these benefits, this assay has shortcomings, such as long assay running time, the manipulation of multiple slides, individually, through numerous process steps, the challenge of working in a darkened environment, and reportedly considerable inter- and intra-laboratory variation. All researchers typically perform the comet assay based upon a common core approach; however, it appears that some steps in this core have little proven basis, and may exist, partly, out of convenience, or dogma. The aim of this study was to critically re-evaluate key steps in the comet assay, using our laboratory’s protocol as a model, firstly to understand the scientific basis for why certain steps in the protocol are performed in a particular manner, and secondly to simplify the assay, and decrease the cost and run time. Here, the shelf life of the lysis and neutralization buffers, the effect of temperature and incubation period during the lysis step, the necessity for drying the slides between the electrophoresis and staining step, and the need to perform the sample workup and electrophoresis steps under subdued light were all evaluated. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6929057 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69290572019-12-26 Evaluation of the Major Steps in the Conventional Protocol for the Alkaline Comet Assay Karbaschi, Mahsa Ji, Yunhee Abdulwahed, Abdulhadi Mohammed S. Alohaly, Alhanoof Bedoya, Juan F. Burke, Shanna L. Boulos, Thomas M. Tempest, Helen G. Cooke, Marcus S. Int J Mol Sci Article Single cell gel electrophoresis, also known as the comet assay, has become a widespread DNA damage assessment tool due to its sensitivity, adaptability, low cost, ease of use, and reliability. Despite these benefits, this assay has shortcomings, such as long assay running time, the manipulation of multiple slides, individually, through numerous process steps, the challenge of working in a darkened environment, and reportedly considerable inter- and intra-laboratory variation. All researchers typically perform the comet assay based upon a common core approach; however, it appears that some steps in this core have little proven basis, and may exist, partly, out of convenience, or dogma. The aim of this study was to critically re-evaluate key steps in the comet assay, using our laboratory’s protocol as a model, firstly to understand the scientific basis for why certain steps in the protocol are performed in a particular manner, and secondly to simplify the assay, and decrease the cost and run time. Here, the shelf life of the lysis and neutralization buffers, the effect of temperature and incubation period during the lysis step, the necessity for drying the slides between the electrophoresis and staining step, and the need to perform the sample workup and electrophoresis steps under subdued light were all evaluated. MDPI 2019-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6929057/ /pubmed/31810189 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms20236072 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Karbaschi, Mahsa Ji, Yunhee Abdulwahed, Abdulhadi Mohammed S. Alohaly, Alhanoof Bedoya, Juan F. Burke, Shanna L. Boulos, Thomas M. Tempest, Helen G. Cooke, Marcus S. Evaluation of the Major Steps in the Conventional Protocol for the Alkaline Comet Assay |
title | Evaluation of the Major Steps in the Conventional Protocol for the Alkaline Comet Assay |
title_full | Evaluation of the Major Steps in the Conventional Protocol for the Alkaline Comet Assay |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the Major Steps in the Conventional Protocol for the Alkaline Comet Assay |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the Major Steps in the Conventional Protocol for the Alkaline Comet Assay |
title_short | Evaluation of the Major Steps in the Conventional Protocol for the Alkaline Comet Assay |
title_sort | evaluation of the major steps in the conventional protocol for the alkaline comet assay |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6929057/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31810189 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms20236072 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT karbaschimahsa evaluationofthemajorstepsintheconventionalprotocolforthealkalinecometassay AT jiyunhee evaluationofthemajorstepsintheconventionalprotocolforthealkalinecometassay AT abdulwahedabdulhadimohammeds evaluationofthemajorstepsintheconventionalprotocolforthealkalinecometassay AT alohalyalhanoof evaluationofthemajorstepsintheconventionalprotocolforthealkalinecometassay AT bedoyajuanf evaluationofthemajorstepsintheconventionalprotocolforthealkalinecometassay AT burkeshannal evaluationofthemajorstepsintheconventionalprotocolforthealkalinecometassay AT boulosthomasm evaluationofthemajorstepsintheconventionalprotocolforthealkalinecometassay AT tempestheleng evaluationofthemajorstepsintheconventionalprotocolforthealkalinecometassay AT cookemarcuss evaluationofthemajorstepsintheconventionalprotocolforthealkalinecometassay |