Cargando…
Multi-Variant Accuracy Evaluation of UAV Imaging Surveys: A Case Study on Investment Area
The main focus of the presented study is a multi-variant accuracy assessment of a photogrammetric 2D and 3D data collection, whose accuracy meets the appropriate technical requirements, based on the block of 858 digital images (4.6 cm ground sample distance) acquired by Trimble(®) UX5 unmanned aircr...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6929115/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31795188 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19235229 |
_version_ | 1783482630049628160 |
---|---|
author | Gabara, Grzegorz Sawicki, Piotr |
author_facet | Gabara, Grzegorz Sawicki, Piotr |
author_sort | Gabara, Grzegorz |
collection | PubMed |
description | The main focus of the presented study is a multi-variant accuracy assessment of a photogrammetric 2D and 3D data collection, whose accuracy meets the appropriate technical requirements, based on the block of 858 digital images (4.6 cm ground sample distance) acquired by Trimble(®) UX5 unmanned aircraft system equipped with Sony NEX-5T compact system camera. All 1418 well-defined ground control and check points were a posteriori measured applying Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) using the real-time network method. High accuracy of photogrammetric products was obtained by the computations performed according to the proposed methodology, which assumes multi-variant images processing and extended error analysis. The detection of blurred images was preprocessed applying Laplacian operator and Fourier transform implemented in Python using the Open Source Computer Vision library. The data collection was performed in Pix4Dmapper suite supported by additional software: in the bundle block adjustment (results verified using RealityCapure and PhotoScan applications), on the digital surface model (CloudCompare), and georeferenced orthomosaic in GeoTIFF format (AutoCAD Civil 3D). The study proved the high accuracy and significant statistical reliability of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) imaging 2D and 3D surveys. The accuracy fulfills Polish and US technical requirements of planimetric and vertical accuracy (root mean square error less than or equal to 0.10 m and 0.05 m). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6929115 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69291152019-12-26 Multi-Variant Accuracy Evaluation of UAV Imaging Surveys: A Case Study on Investment Area Gabara, Grzegorz Sawicki, Piotr Sensors (Basel) Article The main focus of the presented study is a multi-variant accuracy assessment of a photogrammetric 2D and 3D data collection, whose accuracy meets the appropriate technical requirements, based on the block of 858 digital images (4.6 cm ground sample distance) acquired by Trimble(®) UX5 unmanned aircraft system equipped with Sony NEX-5T compact system camera. All 1418 well-defined ground control and check points were a posteriori measured applying Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) using the real-time network method. High accuracy of photogrammetric products was obtained by the computations performed according to the proposed methodology, which assumes multi-variant images processing and extended error analysis. The detection of blurred images was preprocessed applying Laplacian operator and Fourier transform implemented in Python using the Open Source Computer Vision library. The data collection was performed in Pix4Dmapper suite supported by additional software: in the bundle block adjustment (results verified using RealityCapure and PhotoScan applications), on the digital surface model (CloudCompare), and georeferenced orthomosaic in GeoTIFF format (AutoCAD Civil 3D). The study proved the high accuracy and significant statistical reliability of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) imaging 2D and 3D surveys. The accuracy fulfills Polish and US technical requirements of planimetric and vertical accuracy (root mean square error less than or equal to 0.10 m and 0.05 m). MDPI 2019-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6929115/ /pubmed/31795188 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19235229 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Gabara, Grzegorz Sawicki, Piotr Multi-Variant Accuracy Evaluation of UAV Imaging Surveys: A Case Study on Investment Area |
title | Multi-Variant Accuracy Evaluation of UAV Imaging Surveys: A Case Study on Investment Area |
title_full | Multi-Variant Accuracy Evaluation of UAV Imaging Surveys: A Case Study on Investment Area |
title_fullStr | Multi-Variant Accuracy Evaluation of UAV Imaging Surveys: A Case Study on Investment Area |
title_full_unstemmed | Multi-Variant Accuracy Evaluation of UAV Imaging Surveys: A Case Study on Investment Area |
title_short | Multi-Variant Accuracy Evaluation of UAV Imaging Surveys: A Case Study on Investment Area |
title_sort | multi-variant accuracy evaluation of uav imaging surveys: a case study on investment area |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6929115/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31795188 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19235229 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gabaragrzegorz multivariantaccuracyevaluationofuavimagingsurveysacasestudyoninvestmentarea AT sawickipiotr multivariantaccuracyevaluationofuavimagingsurveysacasestudyoninvestmentarea |