Cargando…

Comparison of a New Inertial Sensor Based System with an Optoelectronic Motion Capture System for Motion Analysis of Healthy Human Wrist Joints

This study aims to compare a new inertial measurement unit based system with the highly accurate but complex laboratory gold standard, an optoelectronic motion capture system. Inertial measurement units are sensors based on accelerometers, gyroscopes, and/or magnetometers. Ten healthy subjects were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wirth, Michael Alexander, Fischer, Gabriella, Verdú, Jorge, Reissner, Lisa, Balocco, Simone, Calcagni, Maurizio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6929166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31805699
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19235297
_version_ 1783482641793679360
author Wirth, Michael Alexander
Fischer, Gabriella
Verdú, Jorge
Reissner, Lisa
Balocco, Simone
Calcagni, Maurizio
author_facet Wirth, Michael Alexander
Fischer, Gabriella
Verdú, Jorge
Reissner, Lisa
Balocco, Simone
Calcagni, Maurizio
author_sort Wirth, Michael Alexander
collection PubMed
description This study aims to compare a new inertial measurement unit based system with the highly accurate but complex laboratory gold standard, an optoelectronic motion capture system. Inertial measurement units are sensors based on accelerometers, gyroscopes, and/or magnetometers. Ten healthy subjects were recorded while performing flexion-extension and radial-ulnar deviation movements of their right wrist using inertial sensors and skin markers. Maximum range of motion during these trials and mean absolute difference between the systems were calculated. A difference of 10° ± 5° for flexion-extension and 2° ± 1° for radial-ulnar deviation was found between the two systems with absolute range of motion values of 126° and 50° in the respective axes. A Wilcoxon rank sum test resulted in a no statistical differences between the systems with p-values of 0.24 and 0.62. The observed results are even more precise than reports from previous studies, where differences between 14° and 27° for flexion-extension and differences between 6° and 17° for radial-ulnar deviation were found. Effortless and fast applicability, good precision, and low inter-observer variability make inertial measurement unit based systems applicable to clinical settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6929166
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69291662019-12-26 Comparison of a New Inertial Sensor Based System with an Optoelectronic Motion Capture System for Motion Analysis of Healthy Human Wrist Joints Wirth, Michael Alexander Fischer, Gabriella Verdú, Jorge Reissner, Lisa Balocco, Simone Calcagni, Maurizio Sensors (Basel) Article This study aims to compare a new inertial measurement unit based system with the highly accurate but complex laboratory gold standard, an optoelectronic motion capture system. Inertial measurement units are sensors based on accelerometers, gyroscopes, and/or magnetometers. Ten healthy subjects were recorded while performing flexion-extension and radial-ulnar deviation movements of their right wrist using inertial sensors and skin markers. Maximum range of motion during these trials and mean absolute difference between the systems were calculated. A difference of 10° ± 5° for flexion-extension and 2° ± 1° for radial-ulnar deviation was found between the two systems with absolute range of motion values of 126° and 50° in the respective axes. A Wilcoxon rank sum test resulted in a no statistical differences between the systems with p-values of 0.24 and 0.62. The observed results are even more precise than reports from previous studies, where differences between 14° and 27° for flexion-extension and differences between 6° and 17° for radial-ulnar deviation were found. Effortless and fast applicability, good precision, and low inter-observer variability make inertial measurement unit based systems applicable to clinical settings. MDPI 2019-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6929166/ /pubmed/31805699 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19235297 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Wirth, Michael Alexander
Fischer, Gabriella
Verdú, Jorge
Reissner, Lisa
Balocco, Simone
Calcagni, Maurizio
Comparison of a New Inertial Sensor Based System with an Optoelectronic Motion Capture System for Motion Analysis of Healthy Human Wrist Joints
title Comparison of a New Inertial Sensor Based System with an Optoelectronic Motion Capture System for Motion Analysis of Healthy Human Wrist Joints
title_full Comparison of a New Inertial Sensor Based System with an Optoelectronic Motion Capture System for Motion Analysis of Healthy Human Wrist Joints
title_fullStr Comparison of a New Inertial Sensor Based System with an Optoelectronic Motion Capture System for Motion Analysis of Healthy Human Wrist Joints
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of a New Inertial Sensor Based System with an Optoelectronic Motion Capture System for Motion Analysis of Healthy Human Wrist Joints
title_short Comparison of a New Inertial Sensor Based System with an Optoelectronic Motion Capture System for Motion Analysis of Healthy Human Wrist Joints
title_sort comparison of a new inertial sensor based system with an optoelectronic motion capture system for motion analysis of healthy human wrist joints
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6929166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31805699
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19235297
work_keys_str_mv AT wirthmichaelalexander comparisonofanewinertialsensorbasedsystemwithanoptoelectronicmotioncapturesystemformotionanalysisofhealthyhumanwristjoints
AT fischergabriella comparisonofanewinertialsensorbasedsystemwithanoptoelectronicmotioncapturesystemformotionanalysisofhealthyhumanwristjoints
AT verdujorge comparisonofanewinertialsensorbasedsystemwithanoptoelectronicmotioncapturesystemformotionanalysisofhealthyhumanwristjoints
AT reissnerlisa comparisonofanewinertialsensorbasedsystemwithanoptoelectronicmotioncapturesystemformotionanalysisofhealthyhumanwristjoints
AT baloccosimone comparisonofanewinertialsensorbasedsystemwithanoptoelectronicmotioncapturesystemformotionanalysisofhealthyhumanwristjoints
AT calcagnimaurizio comparisonofanewinertialsensorbasedsystemwithanoptoelectronicmotioncapturesystemformotionanalysisofhealthyhumanwristjoints