Cargando…
Comparison of a New Inertial Sensor Based System with an Optoelectronic Motion Capture System for Motion Analysis of Healthy Human Wrist Joints
This study aims to compare a new inertial measurement unit based system with the highly accurate but complex laboratory gold standard, an optoelectronic motion capture system. Inertial measurement units are sensors based on accelerometers, gyroscopes, and/or magnetometers. Ten healthy subjects were...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6929166/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31805699 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19235297 |
_version_ | 1783482641793679360 |
---|---|
author | Wirth, Michael Alexander Fischer, Gabriella Verdú, Jorge Reissner, Lisa Balocco, Simone Calcagni, Maurizio |
author_facet | Wirth, Michael Alexander Fischer, Gabriella Verdú, Jorge Reissner, Lisa Balocco, Simone Calcagni, Maurizio |
author_sort | Wirth, Michael Alexander |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study aims to compare a new inertial measurement unit based system with the highly accurate but complex laboratory gold standard, an optoelectronic motion capture system. Inertial measurement units are sensors based on accelerometers, gyroscopes, and/or magnetometers. Ten healthy subjects were recorded while performing flexion-extension and radial-ulnar deviation movements of their right wrist using inertial sensors and skin markers. Maximum range of motion during these trials and mean absolute difference between the systems were calculated. A difference of 10° ± 5° for flexion-extension and 2° ± 1° for radial-ulnar deviation was found between the two systems with absolute range of motion values of 126° and 50° in the respective axes. A Wilcoxon rank sum test resulted in a no statistical differences between the systems with p-values of 0.24 and 0.62. The observed results are even more precise than reports from previous studies, where differences between 14° and 27° for flexion-extension and differences between 6° and 17° for radial-ulnar deviation were found. Effortless and fast applicability, good precision, and low inter-observer variability make inertial measurement unit based systems applicable to clinical settings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6929166 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69291662019-12-26 Comparison of a New Inertial Sensor Based System with an Optoelectronic Motion Capture System for Motion Analysis of Healthy Human Wrist Joints Wirth, Michael Alexander Fischer, Gabriella Verdú, Jorge Reissner, Lisa Balocco, Simone Calcagni, Maurizio Sensors (Basel) Article This study aims to compare a new inertial measurement unit based system with the highly accurate but complex laboratory gold standard, an optoelectronic motion capture system. Inertial measurement units are sensors based on accelerometers, gyroscopes, and/or magnetometers. Ten healthy subjects were recorded while performing flexion-extension and radial-ulnar deviation movements of their right wrist using inertial sensors and skin markers. Maximum range of motion during these trials and mean absolute difference between the systems were calculated. A difference of 10° ± 5° for flexion-extension and 2° ± 1° for radial-ulnar deviation was found between the two systems with absolute range of motion values of 126° and 50° in the respective axes. A Wilcoxon rank sum test resulted in a no statistical differences between the systems with p-values of 0.24 and 0.62. The observed results are even more precise than reports from previous studies, where differences between 14° and 27° for flexion-extension and differences between 6° and 17° for radial-ulnar deviation were found. Effortless and fast applicability, good precision, and low inter-observer variability make inertial measurement unit based systems applicable to clinical settings. MDPI 2019-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6929166/ /pubmed/31805699 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19235297 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Wirth, Michael Alexander Fischer, Gabriella Verdú, Jorge Reissner, Lisa Balocco, Simone Calcagni, Maurizio Comparison of a New Inertial Sensor Based System with an Optoelectronic Motion Capture System for Motion Analysis of Healthy Human Wrist Joints |
title | Comparison of a New Inertial Sensor Based System with an Optoelectronic Motion Capture System for Motion Analysis of Healthy Human Wrist Joints |
title_full | Comparison of a New Inertial Sensor Based System with an Optoelectronic Motion Capture System for Motion Analysis of Healthy Human Wrist Joints |
title_fullStr | Comparison of a New Inertial Sensor Based System with an Optoelectronic Motion Capture System for Motion Analysis of Healthy Human Wrist Joints |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of a New Inertial Sensor Based System with an Optoelectronic Motion Capture System for Motion Analysis of Healthy Human Wrist Joints |
title_short | Comparison of a New Inertial Sensor Based System with an Optoelectronic Motion Capture System for Motion Analysis of Healthy Human Wrist Joints |
title_sort | comparison of a new inertial sensor based system with an optoelectronic motion capture system for motion analysis of healthy human wrist joints |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6929166/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31805699 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19235297 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wirthmichaelalexander comparisonofanewinertialsensorbasedsystemwithanoptoelectronicmotioncapturesystemformotionanalysisofhealthyhumanwristjoints AT fischergabriella comparisonofanewinertialsensorbasedsystemwithanoptoelectronicmotioncapturesystemformotionanalysisofhealthyhumanwristjoints AT verdujorge comparisonofanewinertialsensorbasedsystemwithanoptoelectronicmotioncapturesystemformotionanalysisofhealthyhumanwristjoints AT reissnerlisa comparisonofanewinertialsensorbasedsystemwithanoptoelectronicmotioncapturesystemformotionanalysisofhealthyhumanwristjoints AT baloccosimone comparisonofanewinertialsensorbasedsystemwithanoptoelectronicmotioncapturesystemformotionanalysisofhealthyhumanwristjoints AT calcagnimaurizio comparisonofanewinertialsensorbasedsystemwithanoptoelectronicmotioncapturesystemformotionanalysisofhealthyhumanwristjoints |