Cargando…

Incidence and Implication of Coronary Artery Calcium on Non-gated Chest Computed Tomography Scans: A Large Observational Cohort

Introduction  Coronary artery calcification (CAC) scoring is typically performed utilizing non-contrast, electrocardiogram- (ECG) gated CT and offers an estimation of cardiovascular (CV) prognosis and risk stratification beyond previously established cardiac risk factors. Coronary calcification can...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haller, Charles, Vandehei, Anthony, Fisher, Raymond, Boster, Joshua, Shipley, Brian, Kaatz, Christopher, Harris, Jaclyn, Shin, Satoshi R, Townsend, Lisa, Rouse, Jessica, Davis, Sarah, Aden, James, Thomas, Dustin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6929257/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31890419
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.6218
_version_ 1783482662438043648
author Haller, Charles
Vandehei, Anthony
Fisher, Raymond
Boster, Joshua
Shipley, Brian
Kaatz, Christopher
Harris, Jaclyn
Shin, Satoshi R
Townsend, Lisa
Rouse, Jessica
Davis, Sarah
Aden, James
Thomas, Dustin
author_facet Haller, Charles
Vandehei, Anthony
Fisher, Raymond
Boster, Joshua
Shipley, Brian
Kaatz, Christopher
Harris, Jaclyn
Shin, Satoshi R
Townsend, Lisa
Rouse, Jessica
Davis, Sarah
Aden, James
Thomas, Dustin
author_sort Haller, Charles
collection PubMed
description Introduction  Coronary artery calcification (CAC) scoring is typically performed utilizing non-contrast, electrocardiogram- (ECG) gated CT and offers an estimation of cardiovascular (CV) prognosis and risk stratification beyond previously established cardiac risk factors. Coronary calcification can also be assessed during non-gated chest CT, which is significant given the recent recommendations for lung cancer screening by low-dose CT. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 4,953 non-contrast chest CT scans in a single, closed referral tertiary military treatment facility over an 18-month period. Baseline CV outcomes to include myocardial infarction (MI), cerebral vascular accidents (CVA), revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), death, or a composite of all major adverse cardiac events (MACE), and baseline CV risk factors were abstracted from an electronic medical record (EMR) review. Results CAC was seen in 3,119 (63%) patients while 1,834 (27%) were without CAC. All traditional CV risk factors were more commonly observed in patients with CAC. Unadjusted odds of composite MACE, death, MI, coronary revascularization, and CVA between presence and absence of CAC were as follows: 3.55 [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.60-4.86, p: <0.0001]; 2.98 (95% CI: 2.02-4.40, p: <0.0001); 24.42 (95% CI: 3.36-177.6, p: <0.0001); 5.64 (95% CI: 2.58-12.32, p: <0.0001); and 2.32 (95% CI: 1.19-4.50, p: 0.0104), respectively. However, after adjusting for baseline risk factors, CAC on non-gated CT was associated only with an increased observed rate of MI (aOR: 38.1, 95% CI: 4.57-318.2, p: <0.0001) and revascularization (aOR: 5.58, 95% CI: 2.22-14.0, p; 0.0003). Conclusions Findings of CAC on non-gated chest CT may help to recognize patients who are at increased risk of MI and revascularization. Given the expected increase in chest CT utilization among former smokers for lung cancer screening, observed CAC should be reported to ordering providers in order to identify patients at increased risk of these important outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6929257
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69292572019-12-30 Incidence and Implication of Coronary Artery Calcium on Non-gated Chest Computed Tomography Scans: A Large Observational Cohort Haller, Charles Vandehei, Anthony Fisher, Raymond Boster, Joshua Shipley, Brian Kaatz, Christopher Harris, Jaclyn Shin, Satoshi R Townsend, Lisa Rouse, Jessica Davis, Sarah Aden, James Thomas, Dustin Cureus Radiology Introduction  Coronary artery calcification (CAC) scoring is typically performed utilizing non-contrast, electrocardiogram- (ECG) gated CT and offers an estimation of cardiovascular (CV) prognosis and risk stratification beyond previously established cardiac risk factors. Coronary calcification can also be assessed during non-gated chest CT, which is significant given the recent recommendations for lung cancer screening by low-dose CT. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 4,953 non-contrast chest CT scans in a single, closed referral tertiary military treatment facility over an 18-month period. Baseline CV outcomes to include myocardial infarction (MI), cerebral vascular accidents (CVA), revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), death, or a composite of all major adverse cardiac events (MACE), and baseline CV risk factors were abstracted from an electronic medical record (EMR) review. Results CAC was seen in 3,119 (63%) patients while 1,834 (27%) were without CAC. All traditional CV risk factors were more commonly observed in patients with CAC. Unadjusted odds of composite MACE, death, MI, coronary revascularization, and CVA between presence and absence of CAC were as follows: 3.55 [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.60-4.86, p: <0.0001]; 2.98 (95% CI: 2.02-4.40, p: <0.0001); 24.42 (95% CI: 3.36-177.6, p: <0.0001); 5.64 (95% CI: 2.58-12.32, p: <0.0001); and 2.32 (95% CI: 1.19-4.50, p: 0.0104), respectively. However, after adjusting for baseline risk factors, CAC on non-gated CT was associated only with an increased observed rate of MI (aOR: 38.1, 95% CI: 4.57-318.2, p: <0.0001) and revascularization (aOR: 5.58, 95% CI: 2.22-14.0, p; 0.0003). Conclusions Findings of CAC on non-gated chest CT may help to recognize patients who are at increased risk of MI and revascularization. Given the expected increase in chest CT utilization among former smokers for lung cancer screening, observed CAC should be reported to ordering providers in order to identify patients at increased risk of these important outcomes. Cureus 2019-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6929257/ /pubmed/31890419 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.6218 Text en Copyright © 2019, Haller et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Radiology
Haller, Charles
Vandehei, Anthony
Fisher, Raymond
Boster, Joshua
Shipley, Brian
Kaatz, Christopher
Harris, Jaclyn
Shin, Satoshi R
Townsend, Lisa
Rouse, Jessica
Davis, Sarah
Aden, James
Thomas, Dustin
Incidence and Implication of Coronary Artery Calcium on Non-gated Chest Computed Tomography Scans: A Large Observational Cohort
title Incidence and Implication of Coronary Artery Calcium on Non-gated Chest Computed Tomography Scans: A Large Observational Cohort
title_full Incidence and Implication of Coronary Artery Calcium on Non-gated Chest Computed Tomography Scans: A Large Observational Cohort
title_fullStr Incidence and Implication of Coronary Artery Calcium on Non-gated Chest Computed Tomography Scans: A Large Observational Cohort
title_full_unstemmed Incidence and Implication of Coronary Artery Calcium on Non-gated Chest Computed Tomography Scans: A Large Observational Cohort
title_short Incidence and Implication of Coronary Artery Calcium on Non-gated Chest Computed Tomography Scans: A Large Observational Cohort
title_sort incidence and implication of coronary artery calcium on non-gated chest computed tomography scans: a large observational cohort
topic Radiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6929257/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31890419
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.6218
work_keys_str_mv AT hallercharles incidenceandimplicationofcoronaryarterycalciumonnongatedchestcomputedtomographyscansalargeobservationalcohort
AT vandeheianthony incidenceandimplicationofcoronaryarterycalciumonnongatedchestcomputedtomographyscansalargeobservationalcohort
AT fisherraymond incidenceandimplicationofcoronaryarterycalciumonnongatedchestcomputedtomographyscansalargeobservationalcohort
AT bosterjoshua incidenceandimplicationofcoronaryarterycalciumonnongatedchestcomputedtomographyscansalargeobservationalcohort
AT shipleybrian incidenceandimplicationofcoronaryarterycalciumonnongatedchestcomputedtomographyscansalargeobservationalcohort
AT kaatzchristopher incidenceandimplicationofcoronaryarterycalciumonnongatedchestcomputedtomographyscansalargeobservationalcohort
AT harrisjaclyn incidenceandimplicationofcoronaryarterycalciumonnongatedchestcomputedtomographyscansalargeobservationalcohort
AT shinsatoshir incidenceandimplicationofcoronaryarterycalciumonnongatedchestcomputedtomographyscansalargeobservationalcohort
AT townsendlisa incidenceandimplicationofcoronaryarterycalciumonnongatedchestcomputedtomographyscansalargeobservationalcohort
AT rousejessica incidenceandimplicationofcoronaryarterycalciumonnongatedchestcomputedtomographyscansalargeobservationalcohort
AT davissarah incidenceandimplicationofcoronaryarterycalciumonnongatedchestcomputedtomographyscansalargeobservationalcohort
AT adenjames incidenceandimplicationofcoronaryarterycalciumonnongatedchestcomputedtomographyscansalargeobservationalcohort
AT thomasdustin incidenceandimplicationofcoronaryarterycalciumonnongatedchestcomputedtomographyscansalargeobservationalcohort